All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

DENVER

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2047
Posts: 40
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 5037
Posted: #26
Go ahead, lay -4 with a shitty QB on the road in the NFL. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 1864
Posted: #27
posted this in another thread Ill just copy & paste my thoughts

 im a huge broncos fan, i actually live in dc now, i am going to the game & rooting hard for broncos, i will not be betting on it

 that said , putting being a bronco fan aside, & maybe knowing my team a little, this is an extremely tough spot for them . short week, fly to east coast for an early game on a short week, vs lowly skins, sandwhiched between steelers & chargers, oh man, recipe for disaster, toss in the short line to entice bronco backers , also they have lost 2 in a row, so mcdaniels has to deal w losing & re inventing his team for first time in his short career,   skins is the right side to be in + the pts,  i also think Betts is better than Portis

 Broncos only saving grace is since they lost 2 in a row they should be focused & pumped up for a W as normally a team in this spot would  be flat as a pancake,  i will never wager on the skins again this year, they are so bad, but if ever there was a spot for them  , this is it

 hope Broncos roll them, I will be there but very nervous


 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 5414
Posted: #28
Quote Originally Posted by stickman80733:

posted this in another thread Ill just copy & paste my thoughts

 im a huge broncos fan, i actually live in dc now, i am going to the game & rooting hard for broncos, i will not be betting on it

 that said , putting being a bronco fan aside, & maybe knowing my team a little, this is an extremely tough spot for them . short week, fly to east coast for an early game on a short week, vs lowly skins, sandwhiched between steelers & chargers, oh man, recipe for disaster, toss in the short line to entice bronco backers , also they have lost 2 in a row, so mcdaniels has to deal w losing & re inventing his team for first time in his short career,   skins is the right side to be in + the pts,  i also think Betts is better than Portis

 Broncos only saving grace is since they lost 2 in a row they should be focused & pumped up for a W as normally a team in this spot would  be flat as a pancake,  i will never wager on the skins again this year, they are so bad, but if ever there was a spot for them  , this is it

 hope Broncos roll them, I will be there but very nervous



Not like my opinion matters, but I agree that Denver might be looking ahead to the San Diego game next week.  Also, Champ Bailey was kinda exposed last week vs Pittsburgh, so maybe Redskins take advantage??
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 8003
Posted: #29
Quote Originally Posted by bense197969:

Go ahead, lay -4 with a shitty QB on the road in the NFL. 
Well said , bro .. A fan of the pathetic Bears , I guess , and Orton is showing his true colors of late . He is a bit streaky at QB and now he's on a downward trend . The new Off Coordinator for the skins has had a few weeks now with this offense and they should get better on that side of the ball . Wash wins this straight up .. Vegas knows what they are doing with these lines and the pub is jumping on the Bronco because it looks too easy !!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 2506
Posted: #30

You can't look ahead when your winning ways have suddendly stop.  They lost the last 2.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 1
Posted: #31
Denver will win trust me.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 161
Posted: #32

Redskins ML

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2002
Posts: 1285
Posted: #33
The choice in yours, be careful on Denver
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 34
Posted: #34

If anyone is a little confused about who to take in this Denver vs Wahington debate,  Just consider the UNDER on this game.  Check out the Match-Up on Cover's and you're see that the Under has cashed in on both teams something like 8-0.  If you have two bad Offenses and and two good Defense's,  Then it's kind of ovious what bet to make here.

Good Luck to all,

Khesanh

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 2925
Posted: #35
guys were talking about the deadskins here.. they will score 14 max.. low total has me thinking a 24-14 game .... Denver gets my nod
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 459
Posted: #36
Not taking any chances.  Denver ML large for me.  I know--on any given Sunday...  I just hope it's not this one.


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 154
Posted: #37
denver just came off a death march in having to play bal on the road and then having pity at home... thats the top two teams from the afc last year. Denver wins by dd today to the hapless skins.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 335
Posted: #38
but who's offense is worsen then the other. if the skin is horrible then the denver D will become offense and score more. Denver - 24-13
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 161
Posted: #39
Quote Originally Posted by D-Rock-Lock:

Redskins ML

 

I Love it!!

 

 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 2535
Posted: #40
All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.