All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

Brett Favre,you're a joke and too worried about the record!

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 28760
Posts: 388
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 41476
Posted: #201
We do agree on one thing MD, whoever has home field advantage between GB and Dallas will go to the SB. 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2003
Posts: 24854
Posted: #202
Good Bump...
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 3871
Posted: #203
Ernie sims is a monster
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 41476
Posted: #204
300 yards and three TDs with no INTs for Favre and it's not even the 4th qtr yet, again
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 41476
Posted: #205
Brett Favre over 2.5 TDs thrown cashes!!!

Green Bay Over 12.5 2nd half cashes!!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 407
Posted: #206
must have bet on the lions.

Thanks bret
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 41476
Posted: #207
shellz, though this thread was created 9 weeks ago, the idiot probably did
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 355
Posted: #208

2 units on Favre not throwing an INT

1 unit on Roy Williams under 76 yards I believe

So far so good!!

 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 47
Posted: #209

Will see how good the packers are when they play da boys next thursday..... they passed like 20 straight times i like to see how they gonna beat dallas without no running game.

 

Go Cowboys

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 41476
Posted: #210
They also rushed for over 100 yards you nitwit
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 41476
Posted: #211
Passing CP/AT YDS TD INT
B. Favre 31/41 381 3 0
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 4221
Posted: #212

Cowboys will roll up the Pack. 

 

Packers 13

Cowboys 31

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 9700
Posted: #213

Favre

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 321
Posted: #214
Cowboys and packers should be a hell of a game if Woodson and Collins are healthy for Green Bay. Yes homefield advantage would be huge for both these teams in the playoffs but sometimes that us against the world mentality is the defining edge. Both these teams are capable of winning on the road in the playoffs, but I'd give the advantage to Green Bay going to Dallas in the playoffs over the cowboys coming up to play in  cold weather at lambeau.  I look at this match up as sizing up the other team. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 3250
Posted: #215
Quote Originally Posted by MDAAKD:

Cowboys will roll up the Pack. 

 

Packers 13

Cowboys 31



Boys 38
pack  24


 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 8290
Posted: #216
It'll be just like back in the early to mid-90's when both teams were good.
 
Dallas 27 Green Bay 20
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2004
Posts: 3036
Posted: #217
Yeah,I'll have to admit,the Packers look damn good against all of these NON playoff,scrub teams!
 
Bling,you are such a fucking idiot that you can't even admit that the Packers haven't beat anyone this year who is a legitimate threat....It is between the Packers and cowboys because the NFC sucks! So,keep enjoying these wins against scrub teams you box
 
 
 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 14316
Posted: #218
God, please let this thread die already.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 82
Posted: #219
strongsafety you should try to do everyone a favor and go far far away try to find a book that will let you bet on being a fucking moron, or ladies hockey you fucking troll moron
 
 
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 82
Posted: #220
strongsafety you should try to do everyone a favor and go far far away try to find a book that will let you bet on being a fucking moron, or ladies hockey you fucking troll moron
 
 
 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 41476
Posted: #221
So tell us then steongsafety, why is the AFC much better?  You take away New England, the AFC is no better then the NFC.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 41476
Posted: #222
btw weaksafety, I am still waiting for you to provide somebody from the NFC who has had a tougher schedule then the Pack and has a winning record
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 321
Posted: #223
Quote Originally Posted by StrongSafety:

Yeah,I'll have to admit,the Packers look damn good against all of these NON playoff,scrub teams!
 
Bling,you are such a fucking idiot that you can't even admit that the Packers haven't beat anyone this year who is a legitimate threat....It is between the Packers and cowboys because the NFC sucks! So,keep enjoying these wins against scrub teams you box
 
 
 

when your 3-0 against the Nfc East and 3-0 against the AFC west your a damn good football team

  By the way New England plays in the worst Division in the NFL so get off their D###s

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 41476
Posted: #224
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 1579
Posted: #225
And where are the Bears going?
To Sunday School ??    
All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.