All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

BPICKIN DIVSIONAL WEEKEND

Participants:

Posts: 127

OStateBucks

Prospect

Joined: Oct, 2016

Posts: 57

Posted: Jan. 15, 2017 - 11:49 PM ET #126

Just out of curiosity (and you don't have to reveal any details about your system if you don't feel comfortable), but what are the mechanics or logic behind letting out of Game #1 determine your bet on Game #2?

I think most would be believe that the outcome two games are non-correlated and should be capped on the basis on their own merits.

The only thing I can think of is that the lines are set so that one favorite and one dog will win due to Vegas oddsmakers intentions. If that were true, the correct play would be to always play 2 parlays (1 dog & 1 fav) and get a guaranteed +160. (+260 on winning bet, -100 on losing bet).

cruisin

Veteran

Joined: Sep, 2004

Posts: 1608

Posted: Jan. 16, 2017 - 12:13 AM ET #127

Quote Originally Posted by OStateBucks:

Just out of curiosity (and you don't have to reveal any details about your system if you don't feel comfortable), but what are the mechanics or logic behind letting out of Game #1 determine your bet on Game #2?

I think most would be believe that the outcome two games are non-correlated and should be capped on the basis on their own merits.

But haven't both favs or dogs won so far throughout the playoffs on any given day? With there being more favs than dogs I think

All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

BPICKIN DIVSIONAL WEEKEND

Hot Forum Topics