Bengals will WIN OVER 8

https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=41&sub=100793879

amazing in only thousand posts you easily win loser of the month award in a landslide

Quote Originally Posted by bracks:

I laugh at anyone making an Hourly wage period.

LOL, salary men

I acutally MAKE MY OWN hours. I'm able to do that being at the top of the chain. So the CEO does not want me on salary. There are times I work 8 hours a week and there are times I work 70 hours a week. It really depends on how busy the company is at that time.

You stated "I laugh at anyone making an Hourly wage period." So I'm telling you why I'm on hourly.

Quote Originally Posted by fab14:

man you really need to get a life.....I think you have a man crush on superiorinsight...Every thread he starts i see you starting shit in it....You must be gay.

Look at his profile picture. Enough said.

TO improves every team he goes too. Now only that, he improves them DRASTICALLY!

SF's eight yr record before T.O. = 108-36

SF's eight yrs with T.O. = 78-57

Philys two yr record before T.O. = 26-10

Philys two yrs with T.O.= 21-14

Dallas three yrs before T.O. = 25-24

Dallas three yrs with T.O. = 31-19

Buffalo one year before T.O. = 7-9

Buffalo one year with T.O. = 6-10

How does T.O. improve every team he goes too. Not only that, how does he DRASTICALLY improve them? 

When TO is put onto a effective team with a good QB, the team improves.

When with SF, they made the playoffs 7 out of his 8 years.

The first year TO joined Philly, they went from a 4 loss team, to a 1 loss team. I mention 1 loss because they were (13-1 before Donovon got hurt) with a good QB in. They were also a single possesion away from winning the Superbowl.

The first year he joined Dallas, they went from 10 loss team, to a 6 loss team.

As I've mentioned TO needs a good QB so I'm not even considering the Buffalo ordeal.

This being said, I don't understand why a lot of people are saying TO will bring a team down. I will admit he might not be the best teammate to have. The facts speek for itself and TO improves his team in the first year.

TO improves a team drastically when joining them. Don't you have any concept of the knowledage of football? Every year a team changes. It changes quite a bit. New starters, free agents, injuries, new coachs, players retire, and the age factor. If you are going to compare with or without TO, do the right way.

Before he joined, then after he joined. TO greatly improves each and every team. Your clearly OWN HERE.

If you are going to include that stat, put the facts in while your at it. They were 2-9 without TO in the lineup. I repeat 2-9 without TO in the line up. Lets see here

They were 17-5 with TO in the line as Donvon as QB.

They were 4-11 WITHOUT TO in the lineup.

Go check your facts and don't let me OWN you like this.

Ok, so before you said-

"TO improves every team he goes too. Now only that, he improves them DRASTICALLY!"

and now you say he must be on an effective team, and must have a good QB, to improve the team...  What else does any other wide receiver in the league need to drastically improve his team???

Facts are facts

Your clearly OWNED here.

What is your defense? Your trying to deny the fact TO improves every team he goes too? Defend youreself

Facts are facts

Your clearly OWNED here.

What is your defense? Your trying to deny the fact TO improves every team he goes too? Defend youreself

One simple question to cleary stump you. So every good WR that went to a effective team with a decent QB.............that team improved? I can name at least 20 WR's over the last 20 years in which the team did not improve.  

STRAIGHT OWNED

TO improves a team.

At least 20 good WR's went to a new team in which they did not improve.

See the light