Ed Reed missed 11 games in his career. Lets see, their record when Reed is out 3-8. The team allows over 40 ypg over their season average.
Please tell me otherwise or are you going to let me stump you with facts.
It will be easier for the Bengals to pick up a WIN without Reed playing. Am I stuttering?
Yeah I know ... especially when you base the whole theory behind your season wins bet behind the fact that ONE player will be out in ONE of the games they play agianst a WHOLE TEAM this year... as in being a big reason to click the trigger on the bet
0
Quote Originally Posted by SuperiorInsight:
Please tell me otherwise
Ed Reed missed 11 games in his career. Lets see, their record when Reed is out 3-8. The team allows over 40 ypg over their season average.
Please tell me otherwise or are you going to let me stump you with facts.
It will be easier for the Bengals to pick up a WIN without Reed playing. Am I stuttering?
Yeah I know ... especially when you base the whole theory behind your season wins bet behind the fact that ONE player will be out in ONE of the games they play agianst a WHOLE TEAM this year... as in being a big reason to click the trigger on the bet
Their season win total is at 8 at the moment. TO will sign with the Bengals. TO has to be good for at least 1 more win. POUND Bengals over and count your cash later.
Also Bengals plays the Ravens. There is a good chance Reed will be out. A little bit easier for the Bengals to pick up a win there.
Thank me laters guys
Sorry had to post it again. That is funny shit. All the bettors that were on the hill on taking them over doubled their initial wagers and hit submit after seein your writeup
0
Quote Originally Posted by SuperiorInsight:
Their season win total is at 8 at the moment. TO will sign with the Bengals. TO has to be good for at least 1 more win. POUND Bengals over and count your cash later.
Also Bengals plays the Ravens. There is a good chance Reed will be out. A little bit easier for the Bengals to pick up a win there.
Thank me laters guys
Sorry had to post it again. That is funny shit. All the bettors that were on the hill on taking them over doubled their initial wagers and hit submit after seein your writeup
Yeah I know ... especially when you base the whole theory behind your season wins bet behind the fact that ONE player will be out in ONE of the games they play agianst a WHOLE TEAM this year... as in being a big reason to click the trigger on the bet
You have no expliantion
0
Quote Originally Posted by Iw1nBets:
Yeah I know ... especially when you base the whole theory behind your season wins bet behind the fact that ONE player will be out in ONE of the games they play agianst a WHOLE TEAM this year... as in being a big reason to click the trigger on the bet
Id never question your credibility for any reason SuperiorInsight, but I was still confused and not sure if over 8 was the 100% lock call until I heard some of your superiorinsight. I mean holy shit thats some inside shit you just gave us about how Bengals play Ravens this year(good lookin out by the way on finding that FACT) then to just add another cherry on top of the incredible superior undisputed, unwavered, unmatched, educational, brain stimulating stat crunching copasetic influential text in which you give us without any charge.... on top of all taht you then make the connection on page 6 of your 9 page writeup on why to take the bengals over 8 wins you state how Ed Reed will probally be out and that should make the game easier for the bengals. That is mind boggling. I mean the premise behind the ability to be able to hold such a capacity for utter brilliance and then enable us to read your writeups for fucking free of any charges. You deserve roadhead
Please tell me otherwise
Ed Reed missed 11 games in his career. Lets see, their record when Reed is out 3-8. The team allows over 40 ypg over their season average.
Please tell me otherwise or are you going to let me stump you with facts.
It will be easier for the Bengals to pick up a WIN without Reed playing. Am I stuttering?
I'm stating the facts behind my statement. You disagred with with I said. Therefore I countered your statement with facts and you have nothing to say for it. Your clearly OWNED here
0
Quote Originally Posted by Iw1nBets:
Id never question your credibility for any reason SuperiorInsight, but I was still confused and not sure if over 8 was the 100% lock call until I heard some of your superiorinsight. I mean holy shit thats some inside shit you just gave us about how Bengals play Ravens this year(good lookin out by the way on finding that FACT) then to just add another cherry on top of the incredible superior undisputed, unwavered, unmatched, educational, brain stimulating stat crunching copasetic influential text in which you give us without any charge.... on top of all taht you then make the connection on page 6 of your 9 page writeup on why to take the bengals over 8 wins you state how Ed Reed will probally be out and that should make the game easier for the bengals. That is mind boggling. I mean the premise behind the ability to be able to hold such a capacity for utter brilliance and then enable us to read your writeups for fucking free of any charges. You deserve roadhead
Please tell me otherwise
Ed Reed missed 11 games in his career. Lets see, their record when Reed is out 3-8. The team allows over 40 ypg over their season average.
Please tell me otherwise or are you going to let me stump you with facts.
It will be easier for the Bengals to pick up a WIN without Reed playing. Am I stuttering?
I'm stating the facts behind my statement. You disagred with with I said. Therefore I countered your statement with facts and you have nothing to say for it. Your clearly OWNED here
I'm stating the facts behind my statement. You disagreed with what I said. Therefore I countered your statement with facts and you have nothing to say for it. Your clearly OWNED here
I BEG PLEASE PUT UP A FIGHT AND DON'T LET ME OWN YOU LIKE THIS. IT'S QUITE DISGRACEFUL
0
I'm stating the facts behind my statement. You disagreed with what I said. Therefore I countered your statement with facts and you have nothing to say for it. Your clearly OWNED here
I BEG PLEASE PUT UP A FIGHT AND DON'T LET ME OWN YOU LIKE THIS. IT'S QUITE DISGRACEFUL
One player does NOT make a team .Ed Reed is not the whole defense.
Whats your point here?
Game Theory and Implied Odds
Go learn it
Did I ever say one player makes a team? I do know one player can totally change the dynamic of the entire game/defense. Therefore making him extremely important.
Ed Reed is out and the Ravens are 3-8. Is it that hard to understand? It will be easier for the Bengals to pick up a WIN here.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Gunner10:
One player does NOT make a team .Ed Reed is not the whole defense.
Whats your point here?
Game Theory and Implied Odds
Go learn it
Did I ever say one player makes a team? I do know one player can totally change the dynamic of the entire game/defense. Therefore making him extremely important.
Ed Reed is out and the Ravens are 3-8. Is it that hard to understand? It will be easier for the Bengals to pick up a WIN here.
I'm stating the facts behind my statement. You disagreed with what I said. Therefore I countered your statement with facts and you have nothing to say for it. Your clearly OWNED here
I BEG PLEASE PUT UP A FIGHT AND DON'T LET ME OWN YOU LIKE THIS. IT'S QUITE DISGRACEFUL
as any other person who has actually conversed with you before would say... its hard to argue with pure untamed stupidity
0
Quote Originally Posted by SuperiorInsight:
I'm stating the facts behind my statement. You disagreed with what I said. Therefore I countered your statement with facts and you have nothing to say for it. Your clearly OWNED here
I BEG PLEASE PUT UP A FIGHT AND DON'T LET ME OWN YOU LIKE THIS. IT'S QUITE DISGRACEFUL
as any other person who has actually conversed with you before would say... its hard to argue with pure untamed stupidity
I'm stating the facts behind my statement. You disagreed with what I said. Therefore I countered your statement with facts and you have nothing to say for it. Your clearly OWNED here
I BEG PLEASE PUT UP A FIGHT AND DON'T LET ME OWN YOU LIKE THIS. IT'S QUITE DISGRACEFUL
When TO is put onto a effective team with a good QB, the team improves.
When with SF, they made the playoffs 7 out of his 8 years.
The first year TO joined Philly, they went from a 4 loss team, to a 1 loss team. I mention 1 loss because they were (13-1 before Donovon got hurt) with a good QB in. They were also a single possesion away from winning the Superbowl.
The first year he joined Dallas, they went from 10 loss team, to a 6 loss team.
As I've mentioned TO needs a good QB so I'm not even considering the Buffalo ordeal.
This being said, I don't understand why a lot of people are saying TO will bring a team down. I will admit he might not be the best teammate to have. The facts speek for itself and TO improves his team in the first year.
A GOOD REASON WHY BENGALS WILL WIN OVER 8 GAMES.
You clearly stated that your disagreed with my statement about Reed. I threw facts behind my statement and you have no defense for yourself. It's quite funny that your defense is that my untamed stupidity? Or you talk about a detailed write up? I've straight stumped you and your trying to fight back without any arms
You're clearly OWNED here and it's quite OBV
0
Quote Originally Posted by SuperiorInsight:
I'm stating the facts behind my statement. You disagreed with what I said. Therefore I countered your statement with facts and you have nothing to say for it. Your clearly OWNED here
I BEG PLEASE PUT UP A FIGHT AND DON'T LET ME OWN YOU LIKE THIS. IT'S QUITE DISGRACEFUL
When TO is put onto a effective team with a good QB, the team improves.
When with SF, they made the playoffs 7 out of his 8 years.
The first year TO joined Philly, they went from a 4 loss team, to a 1 loss team. I mention 1 loss because they were (13-1 before Donovon got hurt) with a good QB in. They were also a single possesion away from winning the Superbowl.
The first year he joined Dallas, they went from 10 loss team, to a 6 loss team.
As I've mentioned TO needs a good QB so I'm not even considering the Buffalo ordeal.
This being said, I don't understand why a lot of people are saying TO will bring a team down. I will admit he might not be the best teammate to have. The facts speek for itself and TO improves his team in the first year.
A GOOD REASON WHY BENGALS WILL WIN OVER 8 GAMES.
You clearly stated that your disagreed with my statement about Reed. I threw facts behind my statement and you have no defense for yourself. It's quite funny that your defense is that my untamed stupidity? Or you talk about a detailed write up? I've straight stumped you and your trying to fight back without any arms
You clearly stated that your disagreed with my statement about Reed. I threw facts behind my statement and you have no defense for yourself. It's quite funny that your defense is that my untamed stupidity? Or you talk about a detailed write up? I've straight stumped you and your trying to fight back without any arms
You're clearly OWNED here and it's quite OBV
FIGHT BACK AND DON'T LET ME EMBARRASS YOU LIKE THIS
0
You clearly stated that your disagreed with my statement about Reed. I threw facts behind my statement and you have no defense for yourself. It's quite funny that your defense is that my untamed stupidity? Or you talk about a detailed write up? I've straight stumped you and your trying to fight back without any arms
You're clearly OWNED here and it's quite OBV
FIGHT BACK AND DON'T LET ME EMBARRASS YOU LIKE THIS
Yeah you also have added a lot of words since your initial 20 word post on this thread as to why to take the Bengals... I even told your dumbass it wasnt a bad bet overall its just how you carry yourself that is amusing.
0
Yeah you also have added a lot of words since your initial 20 word post on this thread as to why to take the Bengals... I even told your dumbass it wasnt a bad bet overall its just how you carry yourself that is amusing.
You clearly stated that your disagreed with my statement about Reed. I threw facts behind my statement and you have no defense for yourself. It's quite funny that your defense is that my untamed stupidity? Or you talk about a detailed write up? I've straight stumped you and your trying to fight back without any arms
You're clearly OWNED here and it's quite OBV
FIGHT BACK AND DON'T LET ME EMBARRASS YOU LIKE THIS
NO EXPLINATION. ENOUGH SAID
0
Quote Originally Posted by SuperiorInsight:
You clearly stated that your disagreed with my statement about Reed. I threw facts behind my statement and you have no defense for yourself. It's quite funny that your defense is that my untamed stupidity? Or you talk about a detailed write up? I've straight stumped you and your trying to fight back without any arms
You're clearly OWNED here and it's quite OBV
FIGHT BACK AND DON'T LET ME EMBARRASS YOU LIKE THIS
You clearly stated that your disagreed with my statement about Reed. I threw facts behind my statement and you have no defense for yourself. It's quite funny that your defense is that my untamed stupidity? Or you talk about a detailed write up? I've straight stumped you and your trying to fight back without any arms
You're clearly OWNED here and it's quite OBV
FIGHT BACK AND DON'T LET ME EMBARRASS YOU LIKE THIS
Now your defense is "being a copy cat for what I say."
Keep making funnies and avioding the point. Anyone who is reading knows you cleary got OWNED.
Keep trying to defend yourself. It's quite funny
0
Quote Originally Posted by SuperiorInsight:
You clearly stated that your disagreed with my statement about Reed. I threw facts behind my statement and you have no defense for yourself. It's quite funny that your defense is that my untamed stupidity? Or you talk about a detailed write up? I've straight stumped you and your trying to fight back without any arms
You're clearly OWNED here and it's quite OBV
FIGHT BACK AND DON'T LET ME EMBARRASS YOU LIKE THIS
Now your defense is "being a copy cat for what I say."
Keep making funnies and avioding the point. Anyone who is reading knows you cleary got OWNED.
Their season win total is at 8 at the moment. TO will sign with the Bengals. TO has to be good for at least 1 more win. POUND Bengals over and count your cash later.
Also Bengals plays the Ravens. There is a good chance Reed will be out. A little bit easier for the Bengals to pick up a win there.
Thank me laters guys
They beter bring more than the 26th ranked passing game, and dont think TO is the answer. I dont like the over 8 games for Cincy, history shows us that they do not win back to back seasons. Average Cincy wins last 8 yrs is 7 wins per season and with playing the toughest schedule in the league this year, expect 6-7 wins for this circus act. gl
0
Quote Originally Posted by SuperiorInsight:
Their season win total is at 8 at the moment. TO will sign with the Bengals. TO has to be good for at least 1 more win. POUND Bengals over and count your cash later.
Also Bengals plays the Ravens. There is a good chance Reed will be out. A little bit easier for the Bengals to pick up a win there.
Thank me laters guys
They beter bring more than the 26th ranked passing game, and dont think TO is the answer. I dont like the over 8 games for Cincy, history shows us that they do not win back to back seasons. Average Cincy wins last 8 yrs is 7 wins per season and with playing the toughest schedule in the league this year, expect 6-7 wins for this circus act. gl
They beter bring more than the 26th ranked passing game, and dont think TO is the answer. I dont like the over 8 games for Cincy, history shows us that they do not win back to back seasons. Average Cincy wins last 8 yrs is 7 wins per season and with playing the toughest schedule in the league this year, expect 6-7 wins for this circus act. gl
It's funny becuase a lot of people are talking about circus act. Botton line is TO much improves a team. The numbers clearly show that.
The past records don't mean anything, This team was good last year. They got better with TO and Gresham. A 6'8 mismatch across the board. 6-7 wins? So you think this team went that much downhill? Thats pretty funny
0
Quote Originally Posted by Jay4Prez:
They beter bring more than the 26th ranked passing game, and dont think TO is the answer. I dont like the over 8 games for Cincy, history shows us that they do not win back to back seasons. Average Cincy wins last 8 yrs is 7 wins per season and with playing the toughest schedule in the league this year, expect 6-7 wins for this circus act. gl
It's funny becuase a lot of people are talking about circus act. Botton line is TO much improves a team. The numbers clearly show that.
The past records don't mean anything, This team was good last year. They got better with TO and Gresham. A 6'8 mismatch across the board. 6-7 wins? So you think this team went that much downhill? Thats pretty funny
for the last tiem bengals over 8 is not a bad bet.... but its just the way you go about your business and your flaky first post that made me comment. Plus its you dude...superinsight... in 1000 posts and your already a nominee for the loser of the month club in the penalty box. Of course im gonna get you in a headlock and pick on ya
0
for the last tiem bengals over 8 is not a bad bet.... but its just the way you go about your business and your flaky first post that made me comment. Plus its you dude...superinsight... in 1000 posts and your already a nominee for the loser of the month club in the penalty box. Of course im gonna get you in a headlock and pick on ya
It's funny becuase a lot of people are talking about circus act. Botton line is TO much improves a team. The numbers clearly show that.
The past records don't mean anything, This team was good last year. They got better with TO and Gresham. A 6'8 mismatch across the board. 6-7 wins? So you think this team went that much downhill? Thats pretty funny
Yes, they have no Chicago, Detroit, and KC losers on their schedule this season, instead they pick up SD, NO, NYJ. All im saying is yes they made the playoffs last season, and yes they did get TO, but dont stick em in the SB just yet, this schedule looks pretty tough for picking up 8-9 wins. gl bro
0
Quote Originally Posted by SuperiorInsight:
It's funny becuase a lot of people are talking about circus act. Botton line is TO much improves a team. The numbers clearly show that.
The past records don't mean anything, This team was good last year. They got better with TO and Gresham. A 6'8 mismatch across the board. 6-7 wins? So you think this team went that much downhill? Thats pretty funny
Yes, they have no Chicago, Detroit, and KC losers on their schedule this season, instead they pick up SD, NO, NYJ. All im saying is yes they made the playoffs last season, and yes they did get TO, but dont stick em in the SB just yet, this schedule looks pretty tough for picking up 8-9 wins. gl bro
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
These ownings you put on people are SUPERIOR 
Terrell Owens iz a Bengalz Oh Noes!!!!!! And Ed Reed is hurted for dem Ravenz!!!! Ohh Noes!!!!!!
Hot Forum Topics
