• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 2
      NFL Week 2
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Moneyline Picks
      • NFL AI Predictions
      • NFL Underdogs
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

    Belichick Genius?? Someone explain

    «First Previous 1234 Next Last»
    Raiders22
    theMatrix24
    njsupreme1
    OneWayOut
    dubz4dummyz
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 1339
    Posts: 100
    «First Previous 1234 Next Last»
     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 33886
    Posted: Oct. 3, 2022 - 1:07 PM ET #51

    Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24:

    Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @theMatrix24   Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24: belichick went 11-5 with matt cassel. He made the playoffs last year with a rookie qb You do understand that they did NOT make the playoffs that year AND that they also LOST FIVE MORE games than they did the year before with the same personnel EXCEPT for Brady?  A HUGE dropoff. I have never seen this as a good example of his coaching and can even see it as a case against it. bruh you just said it. if brady is the goat 11 wins is a huge drop off? lol

    Correct.  Without Brady they ONLY won 11 games -- basically the same team won 16 the year before.  It is just a subset of the dropoff the Patriots show without Brady.  And the dropoff Belichick has without Brady as his QB.

    In order to prove to a lot of folks he is 'legendary' he has to show he can win without Brady.  That may be partially why Brady left -- to show he could do it, etc. 

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24:

    Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @theMatrix24   Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24: belichick went 11-5 with matt cassel. He made the playoffs last year with a rookie qb You do understand that they did NOT make the playoffs that year AND that they also LOST FIVE MORE games than they did the year before with the same personnel EXCEPT for Brady?  A HUGE dropoff. I have never seen this as a good example of his coaching and can even see it as a case against it. bruh you just said it. if brady is the goat 11 wins is a huge drop off? lol

    Correct.  Without Brady they ONLY won 11 games -- basically the same team won 16 the year before.  It is just a subset of the dropoff the Patriots show without Brady.  And the dropoff Belichick has without Brady as his QB.

    In order to prove to a lot of folks he is 'legendary' he has to show he can win without Brady.  That may be partially why Brady left -- to show he could do it, etc. 

     
    theMatrix24
    theMatrix24
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2022
    Posts: 2335
    Posted: Oct. 3, 2022 - 1:09 PM ET #52

    Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:

    Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @theMatrix24   Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24: belichick went 11-5 with matt cassel. He made the playoffs last year with a rookie qb You do understand that they did NOT make the playoffs that year AND that they also LOST FIVE MORE games than they did the year before with the same personnel EXCEPT for Brady?  A HUGE dropoff. I have never seen this as a good example of his coaching and can even see it as a case against it. bruh you just said it. if brady is the goat 11 wins is a huge drop off? lol Correct.  Without Brady they ONLY won 11 games -- basically the same team won 16 the year before.  It is just a subset of the dropoff the Patriots show without Brady.  And the dropoff Belichick has without Brady as his QB. In order to prove to a lot of folks he is 'legendary' he has to show he can win without Brady.  That may be partially why Brady left -- to show he could do it, etc.
    well aaron rodgers thinks he's the greatest ever. does that help? 

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:

    Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @theMatrix24   Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24: belichick went 11-5 with matt cassel. He made the playoffs last year with a rookie qb You do understand that they did NOT make the playoffs that year AND that they also LOST FIVE MORE games than they did the year before with the same personnel EXCEPT for Brady?  A HUGE dropoff. I have never seen this as a good example of his coaching and can even see it as a case against it. bruh you just said it. if brady is the goat 11 wins is a huge drop off? lol Correct.  Without Brady they ONLY won 11 games -- basically the same team won 16 the year before.  It is just a subset of the dropoff the Patriots show without Brady.  And the dropoff Belichick has without Brady as his QB. In order to prove to a lot of folks he is 'legendary' he has to show he can win without Brady.  That may be partially why Brady left -- to show he could do it, etc.
    well aaron rodgers thinks he's the greatest ever. does that help? 

     
    njsupreme1
    njsupreme1
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2004
    Posts: 2754
    Posted: Oct. 3, 2022 - 1:12 PM ET #53

    @Raiders22

     Belichick doesnt have to prove jack.....greatest NFL football coach of all time..BAR NONE!

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    @Raiders22

     Belichick doesnt have to prove jack.....greatest NFL football coach of all time..BAR NONE!

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 33886
    Posted: Oct. 3, 2022 - 1:13 PM ET #54

    Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24:

    Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @theMatrix24   Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24: belichick went 11-5 with matt cassel. He made the playoffs last year with a rookie qb You do understand that they did NOT make the playoffs that year AND that they also LOST FIVE MORE games than they did the year before with the same personnel EXCEPT for Brady?  A HUGE dropoff. I have never seen this as a good example of his coaching and can even see it as a case against it. bruh you just said it. if brady is the goat 11 wins is a huge drop off? lol Correct.  Without Brady they ONLY won 11 games -- basically the same team won 16 the year before.  It is just a subset of the dropoff the Patriots show without Brady.  And the dropoff Belichick has without Brady as his QB. In order to prove to a lot of folks he is 'legendary' he has to show he can win without Brady.  That may be partially why Brady left -- to show he could do it, etc. well aaron rodgers thinks he's the greatest ever. does that help?

    Sure, of course it does.  A lot of folks feel that way.  But a lot of folks do not.  It always helps to have great QBs and football experts think highly of you.  But you will always have others that say Phil Jackson won because he had MJ and Kobe.  So, you will have some say Belichick won mostly when he had Brady.

    There are some coaches that nearly everyone agrees are 'legendary' -- most just happened to do it with multiple QBs and/or teams.  That will continue to be a knock on Belichick and he knows it --and he IS good, so he will win.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24:

    Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @theMatrix24   Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24: belichick went 11-5 with matt cassel. He made the playoffs last year with a rookie qb You do understand that they did NOT make the playoffs that year AND that they also LOST FIVE MORE games than they did the year before with the same personnel EXCEPT for Brady?  A HUGE dropoff. I have never seen this as a good example of his coaching and can even see it as a case against it. bruh you just said it. if brady is the goat 11 wins is a huge drop off? lol Correct.  Without Brady they ONLY won 11 games -- basically the same team won 16 the year before.  It is just a subset of the dropoff the Patriots show without Brady.  And the dropoff Belichick has without Brady as his QB. In order to prove to a lot of folks he is 'legendary' he has to show he can win without Brady.  That may be partially why Brady left -- to show he could do it, etc. well aaron rodgers thinks he's the greatest ever. does that help?

    Sure, of course it does.  A lot of folks feel that way.  But a lot of folks do not.  It always helps to have great QBs and football experts think highly of you.  But you will always have others that say Phil Jackson won because he had MJ and Kobe.  So, you will have some say Belichick won mostly when he had Brady.

    There are some coaches that nearly everyone agrees are 'legendary' -- most just happened to do it with multiple QBs and/or teams.  That will continue to be a knock on Belichick and he knows it --and he IS good, so he will win.

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 33886
    Posted: Oct. 3, 2022 - 1:14 PM ET #55

    Quote Originally Posted by njsupreme1:

    @Raiders22  Belichick doesnt have to prove jack.....greatest NFL football coach of all time..BAR NONE!

    'Bar none'?  You really think that?  No one else even in the discussion for you?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by njsupreme1:

    @Raiders22  Belichick doesnt have to prove jack.....greatest NFL football coach of all time..BAR NONE!

    'Bar none'?  You really think that?  No one else even in the discussion for you?

     
    theMatrix24
    theMatrix24
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2022
    Posts: 2335
    Posted: Oct. 3, 2022 - 1:25 PM ET #56

    Quote Originally Posted by njsupreme1:

    @Raiders22  Belichick doesnt have to prove jack.....greatest NFL football coach of all time..BAR NONE!
    an_cheers

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by njsupreme1:

    @Raiders22  Belichick doesnt have to prove jack.....greatest NFL football coach of all time..BAR NONE!
    an_cheers

     
    theMatrix24
    theMatrix24
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2022
    Posts: 2335
    Posted: Oct. 3, 2022 - 1:27 PM ET #57

    Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:

    Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @theMatrix24   Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24: belichick went 11-5 with matt cassel. He made the playoffs last year with a rookie qb You do understand that they did NOT make the playoffs that year AND that they also LOST FIVE MORE games than they did the year before with the same personnel EXCEPT for Brady?  A HUGE dropoff. I have never seen this as a good example of his coaching and can even see it as a case against it. bruh you just said it. if brady is the goat 11 wins is a huge drop off? lol Correct.  Without Brady they ONLY won 11 games -- basically the same team won 16 the year before.  It is just a subset of the dropoff the Patriots show without Brady.  And the dropoff Belichick has without Brady as his QB. In order to prove to a lot of folks he is 'legendary' he has to show he can win without Brady.  That may be partially why Brady left -- to show he could do it, etc. well aaron rodgers thinks he's the greatest ever. does that help? Sure, of course it does.  A lot of folks feel that way.  But a lot of folks do not.  It always helps to have great QBs and football experts think highly of you.  But you will always have others that say Phil Jackson won because he had MJ and Kobe.  So, you will have some say Belichick won mostly when he had Brady. There are some coaches that nearly everyone agrees are 'legendary' -- most just happened to do it with multiple QBs and/or teams.  That will continue to be a knock on Belichick and he knows it --and he IS good, so he will win.
    did you see bradys stats in first super bowl run? bledsoe had his moment too in the playoffs 

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:

    Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @theMatrix24   Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24: belichick went 11-5 with matt cassel. He made the playoffs last year with a rookie qb You do understand that they did NOT make the playoffs that year AND that they also LOST FIVE MORE games than they did the year before with the same personnel EXCEPT for Brady?  A HUGE dropoff. I have never seen this as a good example of his coaching and can even see it as a case against it. bruh you just said it. if brady is the goat 11 wins is a huge drop off? lol Correct.  Without Brady they ONLY won 11 games -- basically the same team won 16 the year before.  It is just a subset of the dropoff the Patriots show without Brady.  And the dropoff Belichick has without Brady as his QB. In order to prove to a lot of folks he is 'legendary' he has to show he can win without Brady.  That may be partially why Brady left -- to show he could do it, etc. well aaron rodgers thinks he's the greatest ever. does that help? Sure, of course it does.  A lot of folks feel that way.  But a lot of folks do not.  It always helps to have great QBs and football experts think highly of you.  But you will always have others that say Phil Jackson won because he had MJ and Kobe.  So, you will have some say Belichick won mostly when he had Brady. There are some coaches that nearly everyone agrees are 'legendary' -- most just happened to do it with multiple QBs and/or teams.  That will continue to be a knock on Belichick and he knows it --and he IS good, so he will win.
    did you see bradys stats in first super bowl run? bledsoe had his moment too in the playoffs 

     
    njsupreme1
    njsupreme1
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2004
    Posts: 2754
    Posted: Oct. 3, 2022 - 1:32 PM ET #58

    @Raiders22

     BAR NONE!

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    @Raiders22

     BAR NONE!

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 33886
    Posted: Oct. 3, 2022 - 1:32 PM ET #59

    Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24:

    Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @theMatrix24   Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24: belichick went 11-5 with matt cassel. He made the playoffs last year with a rookie qb You do understand that they did NOT make the playoffs that year AND that they also LOST FIVE MORE games than they did the year before with the same personnel EXCEPT for Brady?  A HUGE dropoff. I have never seen this as a good example of his coaching and can even see it as a case against it. bruh you just said it. if brady is the goat 11 wins is a huge drop off? lol Correct.  Without Brady they ONLY won 11 games -- basically the same team won 16 the year before.  It is just a subset of the dropoff the Patriots show without Brady.  And the dropoff Belichick has without Brady as his QB. In order to prove to a lot of folks he is 'legendary' he has to show he can win without Brady.  That may be partially why Brady left -- to show he could do it, etc. well aaron rodgers thinks he's the greatest ever. does that help? Sure, of course it does.  A lot of folks feel that way.  But a lot of folks do not.  It always helps to have great QBs and football experts think highly of you.  But you will always have others that say Phil Jackson won because he had MJ and Kobe.  So, you will have some say Belichick won mostly when he had Brady. There are some coaches that nearly everyone agrees are 'legendary' -- most just happened to do it with multiple QBs and/or teams.  That will continue to be a knock on Belichick and he knows it --and he IS good, so he will win. did you see bradys stats in first super bowl run? bledsoe had his moment too in the playoffs

    Yessir.  Not as much about numbers and stats for me as it is game managing and sheer will to win.  There are more talented QBs and some that will put up more prolific numbers.  But you have to incorporate that with the other intangibles needed to win -- that some QBs never had.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24:

    Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @theMatrix24   Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24: belichick went 11-5 with matt cassel. He made the playoffs last year with a rookie qb You do understand that they did NOT make the playoffs that year AND that they also LOST FIVE MORE games than they did the year before with the same personnel EXCEPT for Brady?  A HUGE dropoff. I have never seen this as a good example of his coaching and can even see it as a case against it. bruh you just said it. if brady is the goat 11 wins is a huge drop off? lol Correct.  Without Brady they ONLY won 11 games -- basically the same team won 16 the year before.  It is just a subset of the dropoff the Patriots show without Brady.  And the dropoff Belichick has without Brady as his QB. In order to prove to a lot of folks he is 'legendary' he has to show he can win without Brady.  That may be partially why Brady left -- to show he could do it, etc. well aaron rodgers thinks he's the greatest ever. does that help? Sure, of course it does.  A lot of folks feel that way.  But a lot of folks do not.  It always helps to have great QBs and football experts think highly of you.  But you will always have others that say Phil Jackson won because he had MJ and Kobe.  So, you will have some say Belichick won mostly when he had Brady. There are some coaches that nearly everyone agrees are 'legendary' -- most just happened to do it with multiple QBs and/or teams.  That will continue to be a knock on Belichick and he knows it --and he IS good, so he will win. did you see bradys stats in first super bowl run? bledsoe had his moment too in the playoffs

    Yessir.  Not as much about numbers and stats for me as it is game managing and sheer will to win.  There are more talented QBs and some that will put up more prolific numbers.  But you have to incorporate that with the other intangibles needed to win -- that some QBs never had.

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 33886
    Posted: Oct. 3, 2022 - 1:34 PM ET #60

    @theMatrix24

     

    @njsupreme1

     I get it, I really do.  But I cannot put him head and shoulders over several others that did it for multiple teams or with multiple QBs.  He is fully capable of getting there though.  He for sure is in the top few.  He just needs to continue winning now is all.  peace_5

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    @theMatrix24

     

    @njsupreme1

     I get it, I really do.  But I cannot put him head and shoulders over several others that did it for multiple teams or with multiple QBs.  He is fully capable of getting there though.  He for sure is in the top few.  He just needs to continue winning now is all.  peace_5

     
    OneWayOut
    OneWayOut
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2021
    Posts: 2135
    Posted: Oct. 3, 2022 - 1:38 PM ET #61

    Quote Originally Posted by TxRangers:

    @brn2loslive2win  This game had nothing to do with Belichick. It was dirty. Vegas told the NFL for the Packers not to cover - 9.5 spread. And for the record. Winning super bowls with the greatest football player of all time is no accomplishment. You could have been the head coach of the Patriots in one super bowls with Tom Brady and the defense they had. Belichick got fired before brady, and he will get fired after Brady. Greg popovich same thing. Funny how the Spurs have sucked The last 5 years. What happened to popovich? I thought he was the greatest basketball coach of all time. News flash. He had several of the best players of all time on his team. That's how coaches win, with their players, not because of their coaching abilities.
    Kids….an_roll_laughWho exactly makes that call?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    1
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by TxRangers:

    @brn2loslive2win  This game had nothing to do with Belichick. It was dirty. Vegas told the NFL for the Packers not to cover - 9.5 spread. And for the record. Winning super bowls with the greatest football player of all time is no accomplishment. You could have been the head coach of the Patriots in one super bowls with Tom Brady and the defense they had. Belichick got fired before brady, and he will get fired after Brady. Greg popovich same thing. Funny how the Spurs have sucked The last 5 years. What happened to popovich? I thought he was the greatest basketball coach of all time. News flash. He had several of the best players of all time on his team. That's how coaches win, with their players, not because of their coaching abilities.
    Kids….an_roll_laughWho exactly makes that call?

     
    dubz4dummyz
    dubz4dummyz
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2021
    Posts: 14169
    Posted: Oct. 3, 2022 - 1:45 PM ET #62

    Beli is a great defensive mind. Probably the GOAT for defensive minded head coaches...

     

    Obviously he doesn't all those rings without Brady....

     

    Couple other coaches are close or better IMO...even tho they lack the accolades of beli 

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Beli is a great defensive mind. Probably the GOAT for defensive minded head coaches...

     

    Obviously he doesn't all those rings without Brady....

     

    Couple other coaches are close or better IMO...even tho they lack the accolades of beli 

     
    theMatrix24
    theMatrix24
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2022
    Posts: 2335
    Posted: Oct. 3, 2022 - 1:48 PM ET #63

    Quote Originally Posted by dubz4dummyz:

    Beli is a great defensive mind. Probably the GOAT for defensive minded head coaches...   Obviously he doesn't all those rings without Brady....   Couple other coaches are close or better IMO...even tho they lack the accolades of beli
    how show me one coach that made the playoffs with the roster belichick had last year. don't worry i'll wait.  katt williams voice 

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by dubz4dummyz:

    Beli is a great defensive mind. Probably the GOAT for defensive minded head coaches...   Obviously he doesn't all those rings without Brady....   Couple other coaches are close or better IMO...even tho they lack the accolades of beli
    how show me one coach that made the playoffs with the roster belichick had last year. don't worry i'll wait.  katt williams voice 

     
    Robards
    Robards
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2019
    Posts: 9248
    Posted: Oct. 3, 2022 - 1:57 PM ET #64

    @TxRangers

     Ummm Dan Marino end of story...

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    @TxRangers

     Ummm Dan Marino end of story...

     
    dubz4dummyz
    dubz4dummyz
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2021
    Posts: 14169
    Posted: Oct. 3, 2022 - 2:16 PM ET #65

    @theMatrix24

     

     2017 jags. Had a legit d but so does Billy b ...the offense was hilarious....Blaine Gabbert 

     

    Lot of great coaches from the 50s 60s 70s and 80s

     

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    @theMatrix24

     

     2017 jags. Had a legit d but so does Billy b ...the offense was hilarious....Blaine Gabbert 

     

    Lot of great coaches from the 50s 60s 70s and 80s

     

     

     
    Silverstones
    Silverstones
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2018
    Posts: 2365
    Posted: Oct. 3, 2022 - 2:20 PM ET #66

    Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24:

    Quote Originally Posted by dubz4dummyz: Beli is a great defensive mind. Probably the GOAT for defensive minded head coaches...   Obviously he doesn't all those rings without Brady....   Couple other coaches are close or better IMO...even tho they lack the accolades of beli how show me one coach that made the playoffs with the roster belichick had last year. don't worry i'll wait.  katt williams voice

    It's Belichick's roster he makes all the pick so you're saying he sucks as a GM right ?  He can't even evaluate talent on his own team,  Stidham should be the starting QB now .But he had to bring in Cam Newton two years ago made him the starter and a captain he had 5 TD 9 INTS after 8 games and Bill was so Pig headed and couldn't admit he made a mistake and Cam Newton played whole season stinking up the joint .

    Then he drafts Matt Jones he didn't play in many games for Alabama that they weren't favored by 35.5 points he's softy and a stiff.

    Belichick Brady era only had to do with having three bottom feeders in the same division Buffalo Miami and the Jets who sucked collectively for 20 years 

    It's not like the other sports you have to win multiple series it's only a 3 game championship any coach coaching long enough with a decent team will win a Super bowl cause it's onlty a 3 game championship that's why the clown coaches from Pittsburgh and Baltimore have won SB'S . And the Patriots were set up every year by having three bottom feeders who sucked for so long it set up all these Rinky Dinky 3 game championships nothing great happened. 

    Don't listen to the media with the Belichick praise he's an Idiot Savant Retard . 

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    1
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24:

    Quote Originally Posted by dubz4dummyz: Beli is a great defensive mind. Probably the GOAT for defensive minded head coaches...   Obviously he doesn't all those rings without Brady....   Couple other coaches are close or better IMO...even tho they lack the accolades of beli how show me one coach that made the playoffs with the roster belichick had last year. don't worry i'll wait.  katt williams voice

    It's Belichick's roster he makes all the pick so you're saying he sucks as a GM right ?  He can't even evaluate talent on his own team,  Stidham should be the starting QB now .But he had to bring in Cam Newton two years ago made him the starter and a captain he had 5 TD 9 INTS after 8 games and Bill was so Pig headed and couldn't admit he made a mistake and Cam Newton played whole season stinking up the joint .

    Then he drafts Matt Jones he didn't play in many games for Alabama that they weren't favored by 35.5 points he's softy and a stiff.

    Belichick Brady era only had to do with having three bottom feeders in the same division Buffalo Miami and the Jets who sucked collectively for 20 years 

    It's not like the other sports you have to win multiple series it's only a 3 game championship any coach coaching long enough with a decent team will win a Super bowl cause it's onlty a 3 game championship that's why the clown coaches from Pittsburgh and Baltimore have won SB'S . And the Patriots were set up every year by having three bottom feeders who sucked for so long it set up all these Rinky Dinky 3 game championships nothing great happened. 

    Don't listen to the media with the Belichick praise he's an Idiot Savant Retard . 

     

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 33886
    Posted: Oct. 3, 2022 - 2:34 PM ET #67

    @Silverstones

     

     This is slightly outdated now...but:

    The AFC has been weak but Bellichick and Brady have made them look bad as well.

    Consider that the Pats have been in 9 out of the last 17 Super Bowls (almost 53%) and won 6 of 17 for over a 35% win rate and it shows they’ve not only been able to get past the AFC East, they’ve then been able to get past the entire AFC an incredible number of times and then the best NFC team in the age of parity.

    Maybe playing AFC East teams twice per year gives them an easier route to the playoffs and home field advantage, but in reality the toughest things that teams need to deal with by the playoffs are injuries and general fatigue. Even a healthy players is beat down. I couldn’t find a stat on this, but I’d bet that a players just as likely to get injured against the Steelers as they are against the Bills, and regardless teams are putting players on the field for 16 games before the playoffs start.

    I’m an Eagles fan so take this for what it’s worth, but watch their last two wins in the Super Bowl. The second half of LI was a doctorate level lesson in how to execute an offensive comeback on the sport’s biggest stage, and LII was a masterful show in how to beat what was probably a better team by having a better defensive plan and executing it flawlessly.

    Everyone can hate the Patriots and come up with excuses about cheating, but it’s tough not to admire the football they’ve played over nearly the last two decades.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    @Silverstones

     

     This is slightly outdated now...but:

    The AFC has been weak but Bellichick and Brady have made them look bad as well.

    Consider that the Pats have been in 9 out of the last 17 Super Bowls (almost 53%) and won 6 of 17 for over a 35% win rate and it shows they’ve not only been able to get past the AFC East, they’ve then been able to get past the entire AFC an incredible number of times and then the best NFC team in the age of parity.

    Maybe playing AFC East teams twice per year gives them an easier route to the playoffs and home field advantage, but in reality the toughest things that teams need to deal with by the playoffs are injuries and general fatigue. Even a healthy players is beat down. I couldn’t find a stat on this, but I’d bet that a players just as likely to get injured against the Steelers as they are against the Bills, and regardless teams are putting players on the field for 16 games before the playoffs start.

    I’m an Eagles fan so take this for what it’s worth, but watch their last two wins in the Super Bowl. The second half of LI was a doctorate level lesson in how to execute an offensive comeback on the sport’s biggest stage, and LII was a masterful show in how to beat what was probably a better team by having a better defensive plan and executing it flawlessly.

    Everyone can hate the Patriots and come up with excuses about cheating, but it’s tough not to admire the football they’ve played over nearly the last two decades.

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 33886
    Posted: Oct. 3, 2022 - 2:36 PM ET #68

    And: 

    Since 2003 the Patriots are 71 and 19 (.788) against AFC East teams. They are 118 and 32 (.786) against teams outside the AFC East. This could be the end of the discussion as far as I’m concerned.

    The other 3 teams in the AFC East are more consistently mediocre than most divisions, but they have seldom sunk to the level that the Browns, the Cardinals, the 49 Niners, the Bucs, the Jaguars, the Lions, have sunk to. The Dolphins, Bills, and Jets are not usually gimme wins. In fact, since 2003, they are about .500 against the rest of the league. They are at some disadvantage in making the playoffs, because the Patriots are in their way.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    And: 

    Since 2003 the Patriots are 71 and 19 (.788) against AFC East teams. They are 118 and 32 (.786) against teams outside the AFC East. This could be the end of the discussion as far as I’m concerned.

    The other 3 teams in the AFC East are more consistently mediocre than most divisions, but they have seldom sunk to the level that the Browns, the Cardinals, the 49 Niners, the Bucs, the Jaguars, the Lions, have sunk to. The Dolphins, Bills, and Jets are not usually gimme wins. In fact, since 2003, they are about .500 against the rest of the league. They are at some disadvantage in making the playoffs, because the Patriots are in their way.

     
    dubz4dummyz
    dubz4dummyz
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2021
    Posts: 14169
    Posted: Oct. 3, 2022 - 2:40 PM ET #69

    @Raiders22

     

     Dolphins and bills were terrible in the 2000s if I'm not mistaken....they have both turned it around the last 5 seasons

     

    Jets were terrible after the revis era and still struggling to get better. I remember Revis and the Jets giving Brady the most trouble in the 2000s

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    @Raiders22

     

     Dolphins and bills were terrible in the 2000s if I'm not mistaken....they have both turned it around the last 5 seasons

     

    Jets were terrible after the revis era and still struggling to get better. I remember Revis and the Jets giving Brady the most trouble in the 2000s

     
    dubz4dummyz
    dubz4dummyz
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2021
    Posts: 14169
    Posted: Oct. 3, 2022 - 2:41 PM ET #70

    @Raiders22

     What are the Dolphins and bills from 2003-2015

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    @Raiders22

     What are the Dolphins and bills from 2003-2015

     
    njsupreme1
    njsupreme1
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2004
    Posts: 2754
    Posted: Oct. 3, 2022 - 2:42 PM ET #71

    @Raiders22

     

     Terrific posts...great information! I always admire the research!

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    @Raiders22

     

     Terrific posts...great information! I always admire the research!

     
    ArtSchlichterJr
    ArtSchlichterJr
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2009
    Posts: 3459
    Posted: Oct. 3, 2022 - 2:44 PM ET #72

    Well to play devils advocate.. Belli has a losing record when Brady is not under center.... Big sample size to boot... Brady leaves wins SB and makes Arians  a genius after 20 plus years in the NFL.. Belli has won what since Brady left ...  Not much... hmm.... Just saying... genius.... well... Genius when the GOAT is under center for sure.. Without him..  Well.. His record without him gets you canned ..   That's right the Browns  fired him.. peace_5

    Be careful with the axe Eugene.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Well to play devils advocate.. Belli has a losing record when Brady is not under center.... Big sample size to boot... Brady leaves wins SB and makes Arians  a genius after 20 plus years in the NFL.. Belli has won what since Brady left ...  Not much... hmm.... Just saying... genius.... well... Genius when the GOAT is under center for sure.. Without him..  Well.. His record without him gets you canned ..   That's right the Browns  fired him.. peace_5

     
    dubz4dummyz
    dubz4dummyz
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2021
    Posts: 14169
    Posted: Oct. 3, 2022 - 2:49 PM ET #73

    @njsupreme1

     Those stats are skewed as he is using years belichick and Brady weren't together and in the last 5 years the bills and dolphins gotten a hell of a lot better than they were in the 2000s

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    @njsupreme1

     Those stats are skewed as he is using years belichick and Brady weren't together and in the last 5 years the bills and dolphins gotten a hell of a lot better than they were in the 2000s

     
    njsupreme1
    njsupreme1
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2004
    Posts: 2754
    Posted: Oct. 3, 2022 - 2:54 PM ET #74

    @dubz4dummyz

     

    Dumbest argument ever. 

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    @dubz4dummyz

     

    Dumbest argument ever. 

     
     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 33886
    Posted: Oct. 3, 2022 - 3:06 PM ET #75

    Just thought it would be interesting to look at the records of the AFC East since 2001 with and without Patriots games.

    The Bills are 119-169 since 2001. An abysmal 41.31% win rate. However, if you remove the Patriots games of which the Bills are a horrifying 4-32 11.11% win rate. They finish a still bad but much better 115-137 since 2001. That is a 45.64% win rate.

    The Dolphins have been the strongest team in the Brady era in the AFC East with a bad but not terrible 133-155 record. Which works out to a 46.18% win rate. However, for whatever reason they have been pretty strong against the Patriots compared to the rest of the division (a terrible 12-24 or 33.33% win rate). Once you remove Patriots games they are better but it doesn't move the needle a lot. They finish 121-131 or 48.02% win rate.

    The Jets actually do the best by this analysis. They are a merely bad 132-156 or 45.83% win rate. But if you remove their mystifying 8-28 or 22.22% win rate against the Patriots they finish an almost respectable 124-128 or 49.21% win rate.

    Just for fun the Patriots have been 220-68 since 2001 which is a respectable 76.39% win rate. However, if you remove division games of which they are 84-24 winning at a 77.78% clip they suddenly come down to earth. Remove the tomato cans and they are only 136-44 a paltry 75.56% win rate. Or almost a full percent lower.

    To put it in perspective during this amazing run the Patriots would have the following average finishes: Against the AFC East only: 12.44-3.56. Against everyone but the AFC East: 12.09-3.91. How it worked out in the real world: 12.22-3.78.

    So the strength of their division is worth a whopping third of a win a year.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Just thought it would be interesting to look at the records of the AFC East since 2001 with and without Patriots games.

    The Bills are 119-169 since 2001. An abysmal 41.31% win rate. However, if you remove the Patriots games of which the Bills are a horrifying 4-32 11.11% win rate. They finish a still bad but much better 115-137 since 2001. That is a 45.64% win rate.

    The Dolphins have been the strongest team in the Brady era in the AFC East with a bad but not terrible 133-155 record. Which works out to a 46.18% win rate. However, for whatever reason they have been pretty strong against the Patriots compared to the rest of the division (a terrible 12-24 or 33.33% win rate). Once you remove Patriots games they are better but it doesn't move the needle a lot. They finish 121-131 or 48.02% win rate.

    The Jets actually do the best by this analysis. They are a merely bad 132-156 or 45.83% win rate. But if you remove their mystifying 8-28 or 22.22% win rate against the Patriots they finish an almost respectable 124-128 or 49.21% win rate.

    Just for fun the Patriots have been 220-68 since 2001 which is a respectable 76.39% win rate. However, if you remove division games of which they are 84-24 winning at a 77.78% clip they suddenly come down to earth. Remove the tomato cans and they are only 136-44 a paltry 75.56% win rate. Or almost a full percent lower.

    To put it in perspective during this amazing run the Patriots would have the following average finishes: Against the AFC East only: 12.44-3.56. Against everyone but the AFC East: 12.09-3.91. How it worked out in the real world: 12.22-3.78.

    So the strength of their division is worth a whopping third of a win a year.

    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
    «First Previous 1234 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 448,749 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 257,891 Covers arrow
    • Thursday 09/17/2026 737 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 187 Covers arrow
    • Couple Beers 5,143 Covers arrow
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 97,797 Covers arrow
    • DET@BUFF Under 55 Small Write up 3,202 Covers arrow
    • Week 3 Money 2,772 Covers arrow
    • DET/BILLS live in game comments welcome 702 Covers arrow
    • ***Macwesties * Thur. Sept. 17, 2026 * NFL * TNF * Football Plays*** 4,019 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.