• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
    • NFL Week 2
      NFL Week 2
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

    At least look at this

    «First Previous 123
    UpTheAnte
    spost333
    kenyonlv
    putz56
    Lynn_15
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 2507
    Posts: 69
    «First Previous 123
     
    UpTheAnte
    UpTheAnte
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2008
    Posts: 417
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2008 - 4:59 AM ET #51

    I don't think the game was ever fixed, however, circumstances at the end provided someone an opportunity to control the outcome for the bettors.  Although the outcome of who won/lost was never in jeopardy, this call had tremendous effect on where the money fell.  That is my only concern.  (1) get the call right, regardless (2) don't be persuaded by the spread.  The first point was clearly a blown call.  The only questions reamaining - was there some influence to reverse the call on the field?  Why was it reversed and who was involved in the decision?
     
    There needed to be 100% conclusive evidence to reverse the call on the field.  I didn't see anything to overturn the play.  An investigation should be conducted and rule changes implemented to prevent this type of situation and potential point tampering from happening again.  I'm not saying the game was fixed - but something needs fixed.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I don't think the game was ever fixed, however, circumstances at the end provided someone an opportunity to control the outcome for the bettors.  Although the outcome of who won/lost was never in jeopardy, this call had tremendous effect on where the money fell.  That is my only concern.  (1) get the call right, regardless (2) don't be persuaded by the spread.  The first point was clearly a blown call.  The only questions reamaining - was there some influence to reverse the call on the field?  Why was it reversed and who was involved in the decision?
     
    There needed to be 100% conclusive evidence to reverse the call on the field.  I didn't see anything to overturn the play.  An investigation should be conducted and rule changes implemented to prevent this type of situation and potential point tampering from happening again.  I'm not saying the game was fixed - but something needs fixed.
     
    spost333
    spost333
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2000
    Posts: 858
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2008 - 5:25 AM ET #52

    Jeez, the refs blew the call. It's easy to understand. The replay booth ruled that the first "lateral" was a forward pass, which is a penalty, but didn't kill the play since the ball was caught in the air. So the penalty was declined, touchdown. But the refs on the field thought the booth ruled that the SECOND pass was called forward (obvious from the replay it wasn't, but from on the field, not as easy to tell). So, going by their thought that the pass was forward, and it hit the ground, it was ruled incomplete, and the play ended there. No touchdown.

    Yes, it was a blown call. Yes, it should have been a touchdown. Yes, it affected the gambling outcome. But fixed? Just doesn't smell right. Out of all the fixes that have come public, has any involved the NFL? Not that I remember.

    Ironically, almost 10 years to the day, a similar play happened in a Steelers-Titans game. The Steelers scored late to go ahead, but not cover. On the kickoff, the Titans tried to lateral a few times, and one of the Steelers picked it up and ran it in for a touchdown to cover (and yes, they kicked the extra point).

    I'm not denying there is some shady stuff that happens from time to time, but I don't think this was one of them.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Jeez, the refs blew the call. It's easy to understand. The replay booth ruled that the first "lateral" was a forward pass, which is a penalty, but didn't kill the play since the ball was caught in the air. So the penalty was declined, touchdown. But the refs on the field thought the booth ruled that the SECOND pass was called forward (obvious from the replay it wasn't, but from on the field, not as easy to tell). So, going by their thought that the pass was forward, and it hit the ground, it was ruled incomplete, and the play ended there. No touchdown.

    Yes, it was a blown call. Yes, it should have been a touchdown. Yes, it affected the gambling outcome. But fixed? Just doesn't smell right. Out of all the fixes that have come public, has any involved the NFL? Not that I remember.

    Ironically, almost 10 years to the day, a similar play happened in a Steelers-Titans game. The Steelers scored late to go ahead, but not cover. On the kickoff, the Titans tried to lateral a few times, and one of the Steelers picked it up and ran it in for a touchdown to cover (and yes, they kicked the extra point).

    I'm not denying there is some shady stuff that happens from time to time, but I don't think this was one of them.
     
    kenyonlv
    kenyonlv
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 345
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2008 - 6:30 AM ET #53

    Jeff Smith I think you are a nut ... how can you say it took 20 to 30 minutes for the refs to make that call (~3 to 4 min) and that the previous week an EP was not kicked.  Both are blatant falsehoods.  I hope no one from the Univ of Tenn sees this, it would be very embarrassing, although you never said you graduated.
     
    BTW I think the ref made the right call .. my DVR viewing proved to me the first lateral was an illegal forward pass.
     
    As far as if games are fixed ... makes no difference, I still have a 50-50 chance of being on the right side.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Jeff Smith I think you are a nut ... how can you say it took 20 to 30 minutes for the refs to make that call (~3 to 4 min) and that the previous week an EP was not kicked.  Both are blatant falsehoods.  I hope no one from the Univ of Tenn sees this, it would be very embarrassing, although you never said you graduated.
     
    BTW I think the ref made the right call .. my DVR viewing proved to me the first lateral was an illegal forward pass.
     
    As far as if games are fixed ... makes no difference, I still have a 50-50 chance of being on the right side.
     
    putz56
    putz56
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2007
    Posts: 298
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2008 - 8:14 AM ET #54

    No Big Deal Here! Thats why there going to fix this Shit before the Play-Offs.hope they do i cant stand to lose another  
    F-UP call. Also dont forget we get to put that first time ever SCORE in the history books.What a Joke!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    No Big Deal Here! Thats why there going to fix this Shit before the Play-Offs.hope they do i cant stand to lose another  
    F-UP call. Also dont forget we get to put that first time ever SCORE in the history books.What a Joke!
     
    Lynn_15
    Lynn_15
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2008
    Posts: 265
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2008 - 8:34 AM ET #55

    I liked whatever you've showed to us and surely your way to attract the users is great
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I liked whatever you've showed to us and surely your way to attract the users is great
     
    MelKiper
    MelKiper
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2008
    Posts: 498
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2008 - 9:21 AM ET #56


    As far as if games are fixed ... makes no difference, I still have a 50-50 chance of being on the right side.
    [/Quote] right on
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    As far as if games are fixed ... makes no difference, I still have a 50-50 chance of being on the right side.
    [/Quote] right on
     
    HoldEm00
    HoldEm00
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2003
    Posts: 8956
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2008 - 9:30 AM ET #57

    Quote Originally Posted by kenyonlv:

    Jeff Smith I think you are a nut ... how can you say it took 20 to 30 minutes for the refs to make that call (~3 to 4 min) and that the previous week an EP was not kicked.  Both are blatant falsehoods.  I hope no one from the Univ of Tenn sees this, it would be very embarrassing, although you never said you graduated.
     
    BTW I think the ref made the right call .. my DVR viewing proved to me the first lateral was an illegal forward pass.
     
    As far as if games are fixed ... makes no difference, I still have a 50-50 chance of being on the right side.

    my tivo told me the same thing too.

    that first lateral was a forward pass....................stop whining you pitt backers

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by kenyonlv:

    Jeff Smith I think you are a nut ... how can you say it took 20 to 30 minutes for the refs to make that call (~3 to 4 min) and that the previous week an EP was not kicked.  Both are blatant falsehoods.  I hope no one from the Univ of Tenn sees this, it would be very embarrassing, although you never said you graduated.
     
    BTW I think the ref made the right call .. my DVR viewing proved to me the first lateral was an illegal forward pass.
     
    As far as if games are fixed ... makes no difference, I still have a 50-50 chance of being on the right side.

    my tivo told me the same thing too.

    that first lateral was a forward pass....................stop whining you pitt backers

     

     
    JeffSmith70
    JeffSmith70
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2008
    Posts: 49
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2008 - 10:36 AM ET #58

    I know I will be called a nut, lol. Just for your info, if you noticed I made a mistake in saying the ep was not kicked the previous week. If you read all my posts i stated that the game I was referring to was an Overtime game about 3 to 4 weeks ago. I do make mistakes also, Seems like you are pissed that I make a small mistake and after FURTHER REVIEW I MAKE THE RIGHT CALL, The refs however do not!!!!! Oh and by the way, I am not a bettor, so whinning about losing money is not my style. Last thing, I hope the bettors from Tennessee see this or my book. One thing I have always noticed with bettors, they try to rationalize the refs decision based on one game or one call. What I am trying to show you guys is that there is a bigger picture. Oh and the people that are saying that the first latteral was illegal or second was illegal, well they were both legal, the first was close and even if it were illegal play was not stopped and THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NOT EXCUSE FOR THE CALL OTHER THAN THE POINT SPREAD. As for the 20- 30 minute time frame I am being scrutenized about, the total time from pulling the players back on the field, reviewing the play, letting it stand, then the ref huddle, then the overturn, and lastly to the interview that Green admitted they blew the call was a time table of 20 to 30 minutes. All this time to make a decision  that does not effect the winner/loser of the game just the winner/loser of the betting world.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I know I will be called a nut, lol. Just for your info, if you noticed I made a mistake in saying the ep was not kicked the previous week. If you read all my posts i stated that the game I was referring to was an Overtime game about 3 to 4 weeks ago. I do make mistakes also, Seems like you are pissed that I make a small mistake and after FURTHER REVIEW I MAKE THE RIGHT CALL, The refs however do not!!!!! Oh and by the way, I am not a bettor, so whinning about losing money is not my style. Last thing, I hope the bettors from Tennessee see this or my book. One thing I have always noticed with bettors, they try to rationalize the refs decision based on one game or one call. What I am trying to show you guys is that there is a bigger picture. Oh and the people that are saying that the first latteral was illegal or second was illegal, well they were both legal, the first was close and even if it were illegal play was not stopped and THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NOT EXCUSE FOR THE CALL OTHER THAN THE POINT SPREAD. As for the 20- 30 minute time frame I am being scrutenized about, the total time from pulling the players back on the field, reviewing the play, letting it stand, then the ref huddle, then the overturn, and lastly to the interview that Green admitted they blew the call was a time table of 20 to 30 minutes. All this time to make a decision  that does not effect the winner/loser of the game just the winner/loser of the betting world.
     
    italian53
    italian53
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 506
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2008 - 11:42 AM ET #59

    regardless forward pass or not pitt could decline that penalty and take a td there,,,nfl rules!! why have em if ya dont follow em!! if the ball had hit the ground than it would be a dead ball!  that was a td as a td gets!!! as for guys on the take..players make enough and refs dont !!! not sayn they deserve more cuz they suck but i say if you approach any nfl ref with a million dollar pay day on the take id have to say 50% chance of puttin that ref in your pocket!! lets take up a collection on covers and buy some refs!!!!!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    regardless forward pass or not pitt could decline that penalty and take a td there,,,nfl rules!! why have em if ya dont follow em!! if the ball had hit the ground than it would be a dead ball!  that was a td as a td gets!!! as for guys on the take..players make enough and refs dont !!! not sayn they deserve more cuz they suck but i say if you approach any nfl ref with a million dollar pay day on the take id have to say 50% chance of puttin that ref in your pocket!! lets take up a collection on covers and buy some refs!!!!!
     
    jtizzle12
    jtizzle12
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2008
    Posts: 55
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2008 - 11:49 AM ET #60

    Quote Originally Posted by kenyonlv:

    Jeff Smith I think you are a nut ... how can you say it took 20 to 30 minutes for the refs to make that call (~3 to 4 min) and that the previous week an EP was not kicked.  Both are blatant falsehoods.  I hope no one from the Univ of Tenn sees this, it would be very embarrassing, although you never said you graduated.
     
    BTW I think the ref made the right call .. my DVR viewing proved to me the first lateral was an illegal forward pass.
     
    As far as if games are fixed ... makes no difference, I still have a 50-50 chance of being on the right side.

    Dude learn the rule book.  Just because it was a forward lateral doesnt mean its blown dead at that point.  The only way the ball is blown dead is if the forward lateral itself hits the ground. Tomlinsons forward lateral did not hit the ground so the ball stayed live. I had no interest in this game whatsoever money wise or fan based.  But the TD definitely should have counted. There is no question about that.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by kenyonlv:

    Jeff Smith I think you are a nut ... how can you say it took 20 to 30 minutes for the refs to make that call (~3 to 4 min) and that the previous week an EP was not kicked.  Both are blatant falsehoods.  I hope no one from the Univ of Tenn sees this, it would be very embarrassing, although you never said you graduated.
     
    BTW I think the ref made the right call .. my DVR viewing proved to me the first lateral was an illegal forward pass.
     
    As far as if games are fixed ... makes no difference, I still have a 50-50 chance of being on the right side.

    Dude learn the rule book.  Just because it was a forward lateral doesnt mean its blown dead at that point.  The only way the ball is blown dead is if the forward lateral itself hits the ground. Tomlinsons forward lateral did not hit the ground so the ball stayed live. I had no interest in this game whatsoever money wise or fan based.  But the TD definitely should have counted. There is no question about that.

     
    jtizzle12
    jtizzle12
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2008
    Posts: 55
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2008 - 11:54 AM ET #61

    Jeff- I am with you for the most part.  The refs do not make nearly the kind of money they want to and they control the game.  They can bet whoever they want and make them cover a spread regardless of whether its a favorite or an underdog.  I dont think its the NFL fixing anything or Vegas fixing anything.  Its totally on the refs. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Jeff- I am with you for the most part.  The refs do not make nearly the kind of money they want to and they control the game.  They can bet whoever they want and make them cover a spread regardless of whether its a favorite or an underdog.  I dont think its the NFL fixing anything or Vegas fixing anything.  Its totally on the refs. 
     
    JeffSmith70
    JeffSmith70
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2008
    Posts: 49
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2008 - 12:08 PM ET #62

    Well I can't resist. Like I said before, in the 90's the refs at least tried to hide the fact they were in on the fix. In the 90's, look at the box score and see evenamount of penalties, or at least close unless a team was just having an incredibly bad day of misques. False starts, etc. The way they rigged the outcome in those days was to penalize the team they wanted to win ats at a point in the game when the penalty did not matter. On the other hand, when penalizing the team they wanted to lose ats they would call a penalty on a 80 yard TD run, etc. If you do not watch the game or if you do watch the game but not objectively you never caught on to what the refs were doing. If you just look at the boxscore you see basically the same amount of penalties per team with reason and have no reason to think anything was suspect.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Well I can't resist. Like I said before, in the 90's the refs at least tried to hide the fact they were in on the fix. In the 90's, look at the box score and see evenamount of penalties, or at least close unless a team was just having an incredibly bad day of misques. False starts, etc. The way they rigged the outcome in those days was to penalize the team they wanted to win ats at a point in the game when the penalty did not matter. On the other hand, when penalizing the team they wanted to lose ats they would call a penalty on a 80 yard TD run, etc. If you do not watch the game or if you do watch the game but not objectively you never caught on to what the refs were doing. If you just look at the boxscore you see basically the same amount of penalties per team with reason and have no reason to think anything was suspect.
     
    tuttleberry
    tuttleberry
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2007
    Posts: 1162
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2008 - 12:38 PM ET #63

    Quote Originally Posted by HoldEm00:

    my tivo told me the same thing too.

    that first lateral was a forward pass....................stop whining you pitt backers

     

    The point is that an illegal fwd pass calls for a flag, which is of course an offensive penalty. An illegal fwd pass is *not* a situation where you spot the ball where the illlegal fwd pass took place. Now, since there is an offensive penalty on the play, you have to think about whether the play is nullified due to the fact that the penalty occurred as the game clock hit :00. The NFL rulebook states that an offensive penalty does *not* nullify the play if a change of possession occurred. Therefore, the play is live and Pittsburgh gets the oppurtunity to decline the penalty and take the TD.

    That is the point. The fact that the refs said they misunderstood which lateral was being tabbed as illegal only fuels the fire that there actually was some kind of conspiracy going on. If that was actually the reason, the refs would have thought on the field:

    "Okay, so which lateral are they saying is illegal? Well, it doesn't matter because they completed the first lateral. The second one hit the ground and was recovered by the other team. Either we're throwing a flag on the Tomlinson lateral or we're not throwing a flag on the Chambers lateral."

    It's that simple. These are NFL refs. I don't buy that they are so stupid that they couldn't come up with the above conclusion.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by HoldEm00:

    my tivo told me the same thing too.

    that first lateral was a forward pass....................stop whining you pitt backers

     

    The point is that an illegal fwd pass calls for a flag, which is of course an offensive penalty. An illegal fwd pass is *not* a situation where you spot the ball where the illlegal fwd pass took place. Now, since there is an offensive penalty on the play, you have to think about whether the play is nullified due to the fact that the penalty occurred as the game clock hit :00. The NFL rulebook states that an offensive penalty does *not* nullify the play if a change of possession occurred. Therefore, the play is live and Pittsburgh gets the oppurtunity to decline the penalty and take the TD.

    That is the point. The fact that the refs said they misunderstood which lateral was being tabbed as illegal only fuels the fire that there actually was some kind of conspiracy going on. If that was actually the reason, the refs would have thought on the field:

    "Okay, so which lateral are they saying is illegal? Well, it doesn't matter because they completed the first lateral. The second one hit the ground and was recovered by the other team. Either we're throwing a flag on the Tomlinson lateral or we're not throwing a flag on the Chambers lateral."

    It's that simple. These are NFL refs. I don't buy that they are so stupid that they couldn't come up with the above conclusion.

     
    JeffSmith70
    JeffSmith70
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2008
    Posts: 49
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2008 - 12:49 PM ET #64

    same amount of penalties winthin reason. Sorry for the blunders in spelling but I am basically writing a book, short hand on this site. Hope you can forgive my blunders as you do the refs blunders. I am apologizing as they do after the blunder but the difference is that I am not getting paid to blunder... I am in the wrong business. I didn't realize I had this much in common with the refs, and for millions I too can be bought for one or two games. As big as sports are in society today, and the money that exchanges hands on EVERY game, fixed or not fixed still money exchanging hands. You rarely, if ever hear even a wisper of what if the game is fix? could the game be fixed? It is the elephant in the room that everyone seems to ignore. I don't ignore it, I describe the elephant.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    same amount of penalties winthin reason. Sorry for the blunders in spelling but I am basically writing a book, short hand on this site. Hope you can forgive my blunders as you do the refs blunders. I am apologizing as they do after the blunder but the difference is that I am not getting paid to blunder... I am in the wrong business. I didn't realize I had this much in common with the refs, and for millions I too can be bought for one or two games. As big as sports are in society today, and the money that exchanges hands on EVERY game, fixed or not fixed still money exchanging hands. You rarely, if ever hear even a wisper of what if the game is fix? could the game be fixed? It is the elephant in the room that everyone seems to ignore. I don't ignore it, I describe the elephant.
     
    HockeyGuy
    HockeyGuy
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2003
    Posts: 3234
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2008 - 12:56 PM ET #65

    tuttle - Thats what they're hiding behind here.The on field Ref says he was somehow "confused" about which lateral the replay booth ruled as a forward pass when clearly the Chambers lateral went backwards about 3-4 yards.I'd have to watch the replay agian to see if there was a official on the sideline with a clear view of the Chambers throw.I actually sent a email to 60 minutes asking them to do a story on this game
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    tuttle - Thats what they're hiding behind here.The on field Ref says he was somehow "confused" about which lateral the replay booth ruled as a forward pass when clearly the Chambers lateral went backwards about 3-4 yards.I'd have to watch the replay agian to see if there was a official on the sideline with a clear view of the Chambers throw.I actually sent a email to 60 minutes asking them to do a story on this game
     
    skinfan2121
    skinfan2121
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 689
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2008 - 1:51 PM ET #66

    the steelers are one of the most penalized team in the NFL.... does that mean that every game they play is fixed as well???
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    the steelers are one of the most penalized team in the NFL.... does that mean that every game they play is fixed as well???
     
    GOTSTAKS
    GOTSTAKS
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2008
    Posts: 206
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2008 - 2:26 PM ET #67

    Quote Originally Posted by Guy_2U:

    Possible conspiracy theory by the referee crew.

    Confusion of what lateral, foward lateral, dead ball on 2nd lateral, the whistle was blown on dead ball, and we made a mistake seems very suspicious. 

    Investigation needs to review the whole game between SD & PIT. Review the film for Penalties that was missed and called for possible Collusion would be a good start.

    Allegedly the NFL DOES review every game, the whole game.  They say that it is how they measure the accuracy of the referees working the games, and it gives them an opportunity to line their pockets with some of the rediculous fines that they have handed out this year.

    Based upon these results they grade the refs and according to who has the higher grades, playoff and superbowl games are awarded.

    IMHO, none of these guys deserve to even be wearing a referee uniform.  Even IF the "guy behind the curtain" said to negate the TD, it is untilmately the head ref that makes the call.  It is his responsibility to keep the integrity of the game, in this case.. It is an obvious epic failure.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Guy_2U:

    Possible conspiracy theory by the referee crew.

    Confusion of what lateral, foward lateral, dead ball on 2nd lateral, the whistle was blown on dead ball, and we made a mistake seems very suspicious. 

    Investigation needs to review the whole game between SD & PIT. Review the film for Penalties that was missed and called for possible Collusion would be a good start.

    Allegedly the NFL DOES review every game, the whole game.  They say that it is how they measure the accuracy of the referees working the games, and it gives them an opportunity to line their pockets with some of the rediculous fines that they have handed out this year.

    Based upon these results they grade the refs and according to who has the higher grades, playoff and superbowl games are awarded.

    IMHO, none of these guys deserve to even be wearing a referee uniform.  Even IF the "guy behind the curtain" said to negate the TD, it is untilmately the head ref that makes the call.  It is his responsibility to keep the integrity of the game, in this case.. It is an obvious epic failure.

     
    GOTSTAKS
    GOTSTAKS
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2008
    Posts: 206
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2008 - 2:30 PM ET #68

    ...and since when do they review plays that happened (2) plays ago and change the outcome.  THEY ALREADY KICKED THE XTRA POINT.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    ...and since when do they review plays that happened (2) plays ago and change the outcome.  THEY ALREADY KICKED THE XTRA POINT.
     
     
    TampaTony
    TampaTony
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 2041
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2008 - 6:47 PM ET #69

    Quote Originally Posted by GOTSTAKS:

    ...and since when do they review plays that happened (2) plays ago and change the outcome.  THEY ALREADY KICKED THE XTRA POINT.

    Man I love that avatar.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by GOTSTAKS:

    ...and since when do they review plays that happened (2) plays ago and change the outcome.  THEY ALREADY KICKED THE XTRA POINT.

    Man I love that avatar.

    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
    «First Previous 123

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 448,733 Covers arrow
    • Thursday 09/17/2026 737 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 257,882 Covers arrow
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 58,316 Covers arrow
    • Couple Beers 5,104 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 185 Covers arrow
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 97,793 Covers arrow
    • DET@BUFF Under 55 Small Write up 3,199 Covers arrow
    • Week 3 Money 2,704 Covers arrow
    • DET/BILLS live in game comments welcome 699 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.