4 huge trends/stats that cannot be ignored this weekend!!!

1.In the last 40 years there has at least been a 1 or 2 seed in the superbowl.#2 Pitt and #2 Bears left

2.A team going for their 3rd win in a row on the road in the playoffs is 2-10.Jets and GB 

3.A team in the playoffs  that has scored 40+ pts is 2-17 ATS.GB

4.An out right underdog winner favored on the road next week is about 22% ATS.GB

damn looking bad for green bay but i still like them this weekend... i think both 6 seeds make it this year since it has never happend before

Yep, both 6 seeds make it.....

"Making history" as some would say. Good stats tho

I cant buck these either Pitt or the Bears are winning if not both.It has come up so many times where could have happend where a 1 or 2 seed could have not made it to the superbowl but they won everytime.I should go get the record when it could have happend but the lower seed lost

How exactly does that influence the game at hand? That's cool it happened in the past but I wouldn't let that affect who I'm choosing

 

 

Outright dog winner as a road fav the following week was 7-1 ATS this season, correct me if im wrong.

If there is a solid reason why the trend keeps going in the same direction and canstantly it has merit.I can explain why every trend above is so lopsided.

.For 40 yrs there has been no lower seed than 2 in the superbowl no matter whats anyone thinks the higher seeds are there for a reason and the lower seed is on the road.

For 2 teams to win their gm on the road at the sametime when its 2-10 is tough to do

A team that scores 40 well they have had a great gm and he line will always be higher than it would have if lets say they won 21-17 which = some of why its 2-17 ATS

I have played sports all my life and see why some of these trends are valid

Question is, do both #2 seeds make it in & if not, which one makes it & which one doesnt.

could be have to look it up but the person that did it did it for the last 10 yrs

I am going through each yr right now and seeing how many times it could have happend and how many times the situation came up when both could have happend

2009 the franchise of Arizona make it to the SB for it's first time. 2010 the franchise of New Orleans gets to the SB for the first time.  Never say never 

Karma is a Bitc#, just ask Lebron after his tweet. (0-4 since tweet).  Favre calls it quits after 20 years and Packers and Jets play in SB.  Favre came back for one reason, to get to the big game but instead he got his ass kicked and now he's watching two of his old teams play in the SB.

I think the jest getting points is the best play

didnt say never but this is a lil different than a particular team making it to the SB that sucked as a franchise we are talking about 1 and 2 seeds who are very good football teams

I tell you what i will bet on something every year like this that happend for 40 yrs than betting the other side hoping it happends for the first time

Meant that hasnt happend for 40 yrs

I don't think the seeds mean anything. How often does the best regular season team win? The team to streak at the end is the one standing last. Chicago will not win on Sunday, I just don't see it happening maybe they cover the 3.5.

I beg to differ it shows me that the seeding for a 16 gm season for the most part dont lie when you cant get under a #2 seed to the SB in 40 yrs and dude i just give the info do what you want with it

Well 40 yrs is a long span I'll give you that but how long has it been since the NFL has become a league of "parody". This is a day and age were we dont see the dominance of the 49er's in the 80's or Cowgirls in the early 90's. Those days are dead and so are the prohibited favorites getting to the SB. Of those 40 years you also have to ask yourself "Was a 6 seed ever favored over a 2 seed?"  I doubt there was such a case, just sayin.

Ok just went through them 9 times in the last 40 years where it could have happend where 2 teams lower than the 2 seed could have both won on the road 5 times they went 1-1 and 4 times they went 0-2.Then there was 1 other time one team could have gotten when 2 lower seeds were playing each and they lost.

Igetmoney,
Your question regarding parody well the situation has come up 4 times in the last 6 yrs


So 5 times its 1-1
4 times 0-2

And what does favored have to do with anything NE was favored by 9 last and looked liked the far superior team of course until the game was played.Heard the same Sanchez stuuf as i have heard with Cutler remmeber guys do improve and come up with great gm when you least expect it

 

Huh?.........im not understanding. The question I want to know is, has there been 2 teams lower than seed #2 meet up to play each other in the super bowl?

No there has Never been 2 seeds under #2 in the superbowl but the scenero has come up 9 times just like this year where it could have happend and the lower seeds have went  1-1 5 times and 0-2 5 times

That should be 0-2 4 times and its in the last 40 yrs

those are some trends I like