Quote Originally Posted by redskinsnut:
Overheard on Fox Sports Radio with Steve Czaban this morning:
"Some people were wondering what happened to that guy (our very own puffdawg) that was going to have his special computer program...
Umm,,,He's a FRAUD. Total, complete fraud.
Took my mention of his dumb blog and ran with it and is now trying to charge people for his picks.
Scott (co-host) warned me....Oh that guy is DEAD to us."
Puffdawg----->

Yes, I heard that. Their biggest problem is that I am now "befitting" from having them mention their site. See, if you don't know by now, Czaban is a total cynic and loves to root for people to fail. He wanted my plays to fail.
Even when Scott was on the e-mail list where they plays went 4-1-2 (80%) the last 2 weeks, and even when my computer system plays went 11-6-1 the last 3 weeks, Czaban refuses to acknowledge any of it, and instead mentions that I was something like 3-2 or 1-1 last week, and Solly threw in there that I had Cle, TCU and UMD last night. Anyone who knows me knows I don't play college FB at all, and I didn't even have a play on Cle last night. They are fabricating it because they wanted me to do badly, and when I didn't, they got mad that I started charging.
The best part of the spot, and the thing that was the most complimentary was when Czaban said:
"He sent me plays and write-ups with all sorts of analysis and injury reports and trends, and I don't care about all of that. Real touts only give you their plays and that's all, and this guy didn't do that."

Thank you Czaban. Right on the money. I'm not trying to be a "real tout", I'm just trying to show people how to cap successfully and make winning wagers. You can't do that by telling them to take the Dolphins, you have to explain why. And that's my huge advantage. At the end of the day, a guy wants a winning play. Not only did my plays win, I gave you the research behind them. It's one thing to have a page of research if your plays hit at 35% like Lang. But someone can actually learn from winning research....
Not to mention the fact that it's so ironic, as Czaban is bed buddies with Lang and loves having him on air, yet Lang
CHARGES $120/week for his plays and in October, those plays hit something like 35%. So Czabe loves having him on to pump up his website and get people to spend $120/week for nothing but the names of a few teams which lose wll over 50% of the time, but now hates me because I charge $12/week for a weeks worth or research, analysis and insight into how I cap games.
All along my goal was to provide my winning plays on air to drown out the losing Lang and his plays. I didn't get the chance to do that. I simply cannot understand what respectable radio host allows Lang on their show to promote his overpriced and losing plays. How can you "care about your listeners" and let them go to that guy's site and lose money. And then I realized, it's all about money as long as Czabe gets his from Lang.