Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Ravens TE Mark Andrews has a decent shot at being available for the conference championship vs ChiefsMind you they seemed to have played fine without him against TEXANS.
🏈🏈🏈 “To BEt, or not to BEt, that is the question” ...Fubah2's risky bets
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Ravens TE Mark Andrews has a decent shot at being available for the conference championship vs ChiefsMind you they seemed to have played fine without him against TEXANS.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Ravens TE Mark Andrews has a decent shot at being available for the conference championship vs ChiefsMind you they seemed to have played fine without him against TEXANS.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Ravens TE Mark Andrews has a decent shot at being available for the conference championship vs ChiefsMind you they seemed to have played fine without him against TEXANS.Basically Ravens are healthy.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Ravens TE Mark Andrews has a decent shot at being available for the conference championship vs ChiefsMind you they seemed to have played fine without him against TEXANS.Basically Ravens are healthy.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Ravens TE Mark Andrews has a decent shot at being available for the conference championship vs ChiefsMind you they seemed to have played fine without him against TEXANS.Basically Ravens are healthy.Meanwhile big question mark in Frisco as star Deebo Samuel is questionable with a bad shoulder. However xrays revealed no fracture. Status still TBD.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Ravens TE Mark Andrews has a decent shot at being available for the conference championship vs ChiefsMind you they seemed to have played fine without him against TEXANS.Basically Ravens are healthy.Meanwhile big question mark in Frisco as star Deebo Samuel is questionable with a bad shoulder. However xrays revealed no fracture. Status still TBD.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Ravens TE Mark Andrews has a decent shot at being available for the conference championship vs ChiefsMind you they seemed to have played fine without him against TEXANS.Basically Ravens are healthy.Meanwhile big question mark in Frisco as star Deebo Samuel is questionable with a bad shoulder. However xrays revealed no fracture. Status still TBD.However reports are he is still in a lot of pain!
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Ravens TE Mark Andrews has a decent shot at being available for the conference championship vs ChiefsMind you they seemed to have played fine without him against TEXANS.Basically Ravens are healthy.Meanwhile big question mark in Frisco as star Deebo Samuel is questionable with a bad shoulder. However xrays revealed no fracture. Status still TBD.However reports are he is still in a lot of pain!
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Ravens TE Mark Andrews has a decent shot at being available for the conference championship vs ChiefsMind you they seemed to have played fine without him against TEXANS.Basically Ravens are healthy.Meanwhile big question mark in Frisco as star Deebo Samuel is questionable with a bad shoulder. However xrays revealed no fracture. Status still TBD.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Ravens TE Mark Andrews has a decent shot at being available for the conference championship vs ChiefsMind you they seemed to have played fine without him against TEXANS.Basically Ravens are healthy.Meanwhile big question mark in Frisco as star Deebo Samuel is questionable with a bad shoulder. However xrays revealed no fracture. Status still TBD.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Ravens TE Mark Andrews has a decent shot at being available for the conference championship vs ChiefsMind you they seemed to have played fine without him against TEXANS.Basically Ravens are healthy.Meanwhile big question mark in Frisco as star Deebo Samuel is questionable with a bad shoulder. However xrays revealed no fracture. Status still TBD.
i think hes toast for sunday
Well that would be my guess too. I mean why suit up an injured player when he could be more valuable in the SB.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Ravens TE Mark Andrews has a decent shot at being available for the conference championship vs ChiefsMind you they seemed to have played fine without him against TEXANS.Basically Ravens are healthy.Meanwhile big question mark in Frisco as star Deebo Samuel is questionable with a bad shoulder. However xrays revealed no fracture. Status still TBD.
i think hes toast for sunday
Well that would be my guess too. I mean why suit up an injured player when he could be more valuable in the SB.
Looks like the spread on the Niners could be softening a little. Interesting.
Looks like the spread on the Niners could be softening a little. Interesting.
Looks like the spread on the Niners could be softening a little. Interesting.
And no it has flipped slightly the opposite way.
Looks like the spread on the Niners could be softening a little. Interesting.
And no it has flipped slightly the opposite way.
NFL CONFERENCE CHAMPIONSHIPS
Interesting CONFERENCE playoffs stat...
Dating back to 2002, [and obviously excluding the covid year 2020]
the smallish HOME FAVs of up to -5 are only 9 - 8 ATS
and just 11 - 6 su [current ML is around -200]
This year, Ravens fall into this category.
NFL CONFERENCE CHAMPIONSHIPS
Interesting CONFERENCE playoffs stat...
Dating back to 2002, [and obviously excluding the covid year 2020]
the smallish HOME FAVs of up to -5 are only 9 - 8 ATS
and just 11 - 6 su [current ML is around -200]
This year, Ravens fall into this category.
Conference games with odds close to what 49ers are laying:
Since 2002, HOME teams only (as venue matters!)
2021 - KC -7.0 LOSE + FAIL (in OT)
2019 - KC -7.0 win + cover
2017 - NE -7.5 win but FAIL
2016 - Atl -6.0 LOSE + FAIL (NE fluke!)
2014 - NE -7.0 win + cover
2012 - NE -7.5 LOSE + FAIL
2011 - NE -7.0 win but FAIL
2008 - Pitt -6.0 win + cover but vs #6 seed
2007 - GB -7.5 LOSE + FAIL
2004 - Phil -6.0 win + cover
Conference games with odds close to what 49ers are laying:
Since 2002, HOME teams only (as venue matters!)
2021 - KC -7.0 LOSE + FAIL (in OT)
2019 - KC -7.0 win + cover
2017 - NE -7.5 win but FAIL
2016 - Atl -6.0 LOSE + FAIL (NE fluke!)
2014 - NE -7.0 win + cover
2012 - NE -7.5 LOSE + FAIL
2011 - NE -7.0 win but FAIL
2008 - Pitt -6.0 win + cover but vs #6 seed
2007 - GB -7.5 LOSE + FAIL
2004 - Phil -6.0 win + cover
Conference games with odds close to what 49ers are laying: Since 2002, HOME teams only (as venue matters!) 2021 - KC -7.0 LOSE + FAIL (in OT)2019 - KC -7.0 win + cover2017 - NE -7.5 win but FAIL2016 - Atl -6.0 LOSE + FAIL (NE fluke!)2014 - NE -7.0 win + cover2012 - NE -7.5 LOSE + FAIL2011 - NE -7.0 win but FAIL2008 - Pitt -6.0 win + cover but vs #6 seed2007 - GB -7.5 LOSE + FAIL2004 - Phil -6.0 win + cover
thanks for the info but unfortunately not much help to lean either way
Conference games with odds close to what 49ers are laying: Since 2002, HOME teams only (as venue matters!) 2021 - KC -7.0 LOSE + FAIL (in OT)2019 - KC -7.0 win + cover2017 - NE -7.5 win but FAIL2016 - Atl -6.0 LOSE + FAIL (NE fluke!)2014 - NE -7.0 win + cover2012 - NE -7.5 LOSE + FAIL2011 - NE -7.0 win but FAIL2008 - Pitt -6.0 win + cover but vs #6 seed2007 - GB -7.5 LOSE + FAIL2004 - Phil -6.0 win + cover
thanks for the info but unfortunately not much help to lean either way
I am considering taking an alt-line on CHIEFS at +7.5 -200 but not yet decided...
But the alt-line on a CHIEFS play of +7.5 could be had for around -190 so far....maybe better by gametime or +8.0 for around -200...needless to say those numbers cross a significant threshold
I am considering taking an alt-line on CHIEFS at +7.5 -200 but not yet decided...
But the alt-line on a CHIEFS play of +7.5 could be had for around -190 so far....maybe better by gametime or +8.0 for around -200...needless to say those numbers cross a significant threshold
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: I am considering taking an alt-line on CHIEFS at +7.5 -200 but not yet decided...Now we see the RAVENS line has been bet up to -4.5....Everyone likes the home favs But the alt-line on a CHIEFS play of +7.5 could be had for around -190 so far....maybe better by gametime or +8.0 for around -200...needless to say those numbers cross a significant threshold
As expected, with the announcement that Deebo Samuel is no longer Q and will play the line on NINERS has risen to a solid -7.5 in most places.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: I am considering taking an alt-line on CHIEFS at +7.5 -200 but not yet decided...Now we see the RAVENS line has been bet up to -4.5....Everyone likes the home favs But the alt-line on a CHIEFS play of +7.5 could be had for around -190 so far....maybe better by gametime or +8.0 for around -200...needless to say those numbers cross a significant threshold
As expected, with the announcement that Deebo Samuel is no longer Q and will play the line on NINERS has risen to a solid -7.5 in most places.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: I am considering taking an alt-line on CHIEFS at +7.5 -200 but not yet decided...Now we see the RAVENS line has been bet up to -4.5....Everyone likes the home favs But the alt-line on a CHIEFS play of +7.5 could be had for around -190 so far....maybe better by gametime or +8.0 for around -200...needless to say those numbers cross a significant threshold As expected, with the announcement that Deebo Samuel is no longer Q and will play the line on NINERS has risen to a solid -7.5 in most places.
Very significant impact player TE Mark Andrews is good to go for the RAVENS, and reports are he is healthy!
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: I am considering taking an alt-line on CHIEFS at +7.5 -200 but not yet decided...Now we see the RAVENS line has been bet up to -4.5....Everyone likes the home favs But the alt-line on a CHIEFS play of +7.5 could be had for around -190 so far....maybe better by gametime or +8.0 for around -200...needless to say those numbers cross a significant threshold As expected, with the announcement that Deebo Samuel is no longer Q and will play the line on NINERS has risen to a solid -7.5 in most places.
Very significant impact player TE Mark Andrews is good to go for the RAVENS, and reports are he is healthy!
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: I am considering taking an alt-line on CHIEFS at +7.5 -200 but not yet decided...Now we see the RAVENS line has been bet up to -4.5....Everyone likes the home favs But the alt-line on a CHIEFS play of +7.5 could be had for around -190 so far....maybe better by gametime or +8.0 for around -200...needless to say those numbers cross a significant threshold As expected, with the announcement that Deebo Samuel is no longer Q and will play the line on NINERS has risen to a solid -7.5 in most places. Very significant impact player TE Mark Andrews is good to go for the RAVENS, and reports are he is healthy!
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: I am considering taking an alt-line on CHIEFS at +7.5 -200 but not yet decided...Now we see the RAVENS line has been bet up to -4.5....Everyone likes the home favs But the alt-line on a CHIEFS play of +7.5 could be had for around -190 so far....maybe better by gametime or +8.0 for around -200...needless to say those numbers cross a significant threshold As expected, with the announcement that Deebo Samuel is no longer Q and will play the line on NINERS has risen to a solid -7.5 in most places. Very significant impact player TE Mark Andrews is good to go for the RAVENS, and reports are he is healthy!
Previous CONFERENCE games with lines on a HOME FAV at a TD similar to what the NINERS line is today:
2021 - KC -7.0 LOSE + FAIL (in OT)
2019 - KC -7.0 win + cover
2017 - NE -7.5 win but FAIL
2014 - NE -7.0 win + cover
2012 - NE -7.5 LOSE + FAIL
2011 - NE -7.0 win but FAIL
2007 - GB -7.5 LOSE + FAIL
All above since 2002...
Previous CONFERENCE games with lines on a HOME FAV at a TD similar to what the NINERS line is today:
2021 - KC -7.0 LOSE + FAIL (in OT)
2019 - KC -7.0 win + cover
2017 - NE -7.5 win but FAIL
2014 - NE -7.0 win + cover
2012 - NE -7.5 LOSE + FAIL
2011 - NE -7.0 win but FAIL
2007 - GB -7.5 LOSE + FAIL
All above since 2002...
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Playoffs: 43 - 15 so far
Ravens -1.0 -210
Adding Ravens -1.5 -200
Ravens -2.0 -190
Will be hoping to find a good middle opp using alt-lines as the game progresses, hopefully after a Ravens score so I can grab CHIEFS maybe on a +10.5 or +14.5 for decent value
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Playoffs: 43 - 15 so far
Ravens -1.0 -210
Adding Ravens -1.5 -200
Ravens -2.0 -190
Will be hoping to find a good middle opp using alt-lines as the game progresses, hopefully after a Ravens score so I can grab CHIEFS maybe on a +10.5 or +14.5 for decent value
Hot Forum Topics
- Claiming Prizes 57,609
- Sunday 09/27/2026 498
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 265,089
- Sunday 3,115
- NFL LOCKED IN! 101,897
- NFL THREAD * 151 * 13,512
- ***Macwesties * Thur. * Sun. Sept. 24, 27, 2026 * Week #3 * NFL Football Plays* 8,730
- NFL Sunday 7,067
- Rams vs Broncos in game live SNF 1,656
- Mike Trout Strikeouts 7,110
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
