WELL I DONT KNOW IF IT IS THE RIGHT PLAY...BUT MOST OF MY SIGNS ARE TELLING ME TO FIRE AWAY....![]()
UNDER 216
A. AFTER CRUNCHING #'S I ACTUALLY TOOK THE UNDER IN THE 1ST GAME...OOOPS
B. LAST GAME TOTAL WAS 210.5, BECAUSE OF THE BLOWOUT AND PUBLIC PERCEPTION THE TOTAL IS ALL THE WAY UP TO 216
C. CONSIDERING THE 1ST GAME TOTAL WAS A FULL 25 PTS OFF, IT IS SAFE TO ASSUME THAT IT WAS JUST A CRAZY GAME AND SHOULD BE DISGARDED, THE BOOKS ARENT THAT STUPID.
D. 75% OF THE PUBLIC IS ON THE OVER
E. LAST GAME LAKERS SHOT 58% FG, 47.1% 3PT, & 81.8% FT: THOSE NUMBERS SHOULD COME DOWN THIS GAME
F. UNLESS THE SUNS ARE COMPLETELY CLUELESS, THEY HAVE TO REALIZE THAT THEY NEED TO PLAY SOME DEFENSE IF THEY ARE GOING TO WIN...THEY CANT JUST OUT SHOOT THIS TEAM LIKE EVERY OTHER
G. AMARE HAS PISSED LA OFF, CONGRATS TO HIM, LAKERS SHOULD BRING SOME HARD DEFENSE
OTHER OPINIONS WELCOME
WELL I DONT KNOW IF IT IS THE RIGHT PLAY...BUT MOST OF MY SIGNS ARE TELLING ME TO FIRE AWAY....![]()
UNDER 216
A. AFTER CRUNCHING #'S I ACTUALLY TOOK THE UNDER IN THE 1ST GAME...OOOPS
B. LAST GAME TOTAL WAS 210.5, BECAUSE OF THE BLOWOUT AND PUBLIC PERCEPTION THE TOTAL IS ALL THE WAY UP TO 216
C. CONSIDERING THE 1ST GAME TOTAL WAS A FULL 25 PTS OFF, IT IS SAFE TO ASSUME THAT IT WAS JUST A CRAZY GAME AND SHOULD BE DISGARDED, THE BOOKS ARENT THAT STUPID.
D. 75% OF THE PUBLIC IS ON THE OVER
E. LAST GAME LAKERS SHOT 58% FG, 47.1% 3PT, & 81.8% FT: THOSE NUMBERS SHOULD COME DOWN THIS GAME
F. UNLESS THE SUNS ARE COMPLETELY CLUELESS, THEY HAVE TO REALIZE THAT THEY NEED TO PLAY SOME DEFENSE IF THEY ARE GOING TO WIN...THEY CANT JUST OUT SHOOT THIS TEAM LIKE EVERY OTHER
G. AMARE HAS PISSED LA OFF, CONGRATS TO HIM, LAKERS SHOULD BRING SOME HARD DEFENSE
OTHER OPINIONS WELCOME
WELL I DONT KNOW IF IT IS THE RIGHT PLAY...BUT MOST OF MY SIGNS ARE TELLING ME TO FIRE AWAY....![]()
UNDER 216
A. AFTER CRUNCHING #'S I ACTUALLY TOOK THE UNDER IN THE 1ST GAME...OOOPS
B. LAST GAME TOTAL WAS 210.5, BECAUSE OF THE BLOWOUT AND PUBLIC PERCEPTION THE TOTAL IS ALL THE WAY UP TO 216
C. CONSIDERING THE 1ST GAME TOTAL WAS A FULL 25 PTS OFF, IT IS SAFE TO ASSUME THAT IT WAS JUST A CRAZY GAME AND SHOULD BE DISGARDED, THE BOOKS ARENT THAT STUPID.
D. 75% OF THE PUBLIC IS ON THE OVER
E. LAST GAME LAKERS SHOT 58% FG, 47.1% 3PT, & 81.8% FT: THOSE NUMBERS SHOULD COME DOWN THIS GAME
F. UNLESS THE SUNS ARE COMPLETELY CLUELESS, THEY HAVE TO REALIZE THAT THEY NEED TO PLAY SOME DEFENSE IF THEY ARE GOING TO WIN...THEY CANT JUST OUT SHOOT THIS TEAM LIKE EVERY OTHER
G. AMARE HAS PISSED LA OFF, CONGRATS TO HIM, LAKERS SHOULD BRING SOME HARD DEFENSE
OTHER OPINIONS WELCOME
WELL I DONT KNOW IF IT IS THE RIGHT PLAY...BUT MOST OF MY SIGNS ARE TELLING ME TO FIRE AWAY....![]()
UNDER 216
A. AFTER CRUNCHING #'S I ACTUALLY TOOK THE UNDER IN THE 1ST GAME...OOOPS
B. LAST GAME TOTAL WAS 210.5, BECAUSE OF THE BLOWOUT AND PUBLIC PERCEPTION THE TOTAL IS ALL THE WAY UP TO 216
C. CONSIDERING THE 1ST GAME TOTAL WAS A FULL 25 PTS OFF, IT IS SAFE TO ASSUME THAT IT WAS JUST A CRAZY GAME AND SHOULD BE DISGARDED, THE BOOKS ARENT THAT STUPID.
D. 75% OF THE PUBLIC IS ON THE OVER
E. LAST GAME LAKERS SHOT 58% FG, 47.1% 3PT, & 81.8% FT: THOSE NUMBERS SHOULD COME DOWN THIS GAME
F. UNLESS THE SUNS ARE COMPLETELY CLUELESS, THEY HAVE TO REALIZE THAT THEY NEED TO PLAY SOME DEFENSE IF THEY ARE GOING TO WIN...THEY CANT JUST OUT SHOOT THIS TEAM LIKE EVERY OTHER
G. AMARE HAS PISSED LA OFF, CONGRATS TO HIM, LAKERS SHOULD BRING SOME HARD DEFENSE
OTHER OPINIONS WELCOME
HA YA ME TOO....LIKE SHIT MY PANTS SCARED....BUT HEY, A WISE MAN ONCE TOLD ME....SCARED MONEY DONT MAKE MONEY. IT ALSO FREAKS ME OUT THAT TWO GAMES BETWEEN THESE TWO HAD O/U OF 220 & 220.5. DEF NOT FUN PICKING UNDER W/ PHO AND LA
HA YA ME TOO....LIKE SHIT MY PANTS SCARED....BUT HEY, A WISE MAN ONCE TOLD ME....SCARED MONEY DONT MAKE MONEY. IT ALSO FREAKS ME OUT THAT TWO GAMES BETWEEN THESE TWO HAD O/U OF 220 & 220.5. DEF NOT FUN PICKING UNDER W/ PHO AND LA
Just wondering how many units are you playing on this? 4.5 units or 11units so I can gage the strength of this bet of yours.
Thanks and GL.
Just wondering how many units are you playing on this? 4.5 units or 11units so I can gage the strength of this bet of yours.
Thanks and GL.
Just wondering how many units are you playing on this? 4.5 units or 11units so I can gage the strength of this bet of yours.
Thanks and GL.
Nevermind...I see it on the 1st page.
Just wondering how many units are you playing on this? 4.5 units or 11units so I can gage the strength of this bet of yours.
Thanks and GL.
Nevermind...I see it on the 1st page.
I SEE WHAT YOUR SAYING.....BUT CONSIDERING THE LAST GAME NETTED 235 PTS....WOULDNT 220 OR MORE BE A MORE APPROPRIATE NUMBER TO "LURE" PEOPLE TO THE UNDER?....IS IT POSSIBLE THE BOOKS KNEW THEIR ORIGINAL NUMBER WAS GOOD SO THEY DIDNT WANT TO MOVE IT TOO MUCH FOR THE SHARPS...BUT ADJUSTED IT SO THEY DIDNT HAVE 100% OF PUBLIC ON THE OVER???
I SEE WHAT YOUR SAYING.....BUT CONSIDERING THE LAST GAME NETTED 235 PTS....WOULDNT 220 OR MORE BE A MORE APPROPRIATE NUMBER TO "LURE" PEOPLE TO THE UNDER?....IS IT POSSIBLE THE BOOKS KNEW THEIR ORIGINAL NUMBER WAS GOOD SO THEY DIDNT WANT TO MOVE IT TOO MUCH FOR THE SHARPS...BUT ADJUSTED IT SO THEY DIDNT HAVE 100% OF PUBLIC ON THE OVER???

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.