All Forums | NBA Betting Forum

Yes, you can lay the 3.5 with the Knicks on the road tonight.

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 3620
Posts: 59
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 15772
Posted: #26
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 6580
Posted: #27
Damn that sucks, I picked the Nets +4. I don't feel confident about it anymore.

Bol Scal
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 244
Posted: #28
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 8810
Posted: #29
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 4471
Posted: #30

GL Brian.  You got me sold on NY.  Gonna sprinkle a little on them. 

As for Denver.  Bet against them tonight.  5 is too many to give Detroit tonight.  Pistons roll.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #31
Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:

Damn that sucks, I picked the Nets +4. I don't feel confident about it anymore.

Bol Scal

No shame in taking 4 for a quality home dog, especially one as good as the Nets as one of the top teams in the East.

Situationally though, I have to see a lot more from the Nets in this recent slide to back them even with such an attractive line. They are in a funk without Brook and need to learn how to function with Blatche while trusting him in the low post.

BOL 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by QuentinT:

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by buffalo11:

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by lovethedough:

GL Brian.  You got me sold on NY.  Gonna sprinkle a little on them. 

As for Denver.  Bet against them tonight.  5 is too many to give Detroit tonight.  Pistons roll.


Sounds good.

Thanks for the tip but, I need to stay away from the Nuggets for the time being. They are radioactive betting material at the moment, at least for me. GL.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 55436
Posted: #35
Almost made me second guess myself and take Brooklyn. However, you have to be correct eventually. I have my fingers crossed.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 6580
Posted: #36
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:


No shame in taking 4 for a quality home dog, especially one as good as the Nets as one of the top teams in the East.

Situationally though, I have to see a lot more from the Nets in this recent slide to back them even with such an attractive line. They are in a funk without Brook and need to learn how to function with Blatche while trusting him in the low post.

BOL 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 1197
Posted: #37
knicks 1-7 so far

nets pounding them silly
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 15772
Posted: #38
Good comeback
Double down at the half?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #39
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

Almost made me second guess myself and take Brooklyn. However, you have to be correct eventually. I have my fingers crossed.

Yeah right. I'm sure there's a second guess on the other side when you are willing to spot 20.5 at 8-1 on the Knicks. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by siberian81:

knicks 1-7 so far

nets pounding them silly

Nets blow leads. Ask Golden State. Game is far from over. This number and win itself will be much more of a challenge than I thought. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #41
Quote Originally Posted by Crashdavis565:

Good comeback
Double down at the half?

No thanks. I loathe quarter, first half and second half lines. 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 55436
Posted: #42
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:


Yeah right. I'm sure there's a second guess on the other side when you are willing to spot 20.5 at 8-1 on the Knicks. 

As soon as I see a mush like you that doesnt know anything about sports or gambling make a thread for a specific game I know I should bet the other way. You and a couple others on here are golden for that.

Happens all the time. Please continue posting your plays. 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 6275
Posted: #43
Knickerbockers -4 2nd half, pk, +5.5 and +1.5 in game, total $3,500. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #44
Wow. Ok. 

The game can't end like a regular game (i.e. team with lead gets the defensive rebound, gets fouled, 2 FT's to win by 5 like the tens of thousands of others that end that way). Nope. Nets get off three shots after Kidd misses the FT to cover. Knicks are doing me good aren't they.

I'm gonna start buying hooks by the truckload. 

Anyhow, congrats Nets backers (ktrain). That was the right side for a motivated team tonight who pretty much lead coast to coast outside the last 3 min. I should have hit this line up last night when it opened at 3. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #45
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

As soon as I see a mush like you that doesnt know anything about sports or gambling make a thread for a specific game I know I should bet the other way. You and a couple others on here are golden for that.

Happens all the time. Please continue posting your plays. 


This from a guy who created a thread laying 20.5 with the Knicks. 

Kid you're a fool. You post your plays, give no analysis, have the typical lemmings pop in with the handshakes and beer taps and think you are a capper. Nobody cares. Post your 14 NFL plays night in night out, hit your 50% (chance), pay the juice to Vegas and see if anyone cares outside of a few BOL's that you tap yourself on the back with. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #46
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

As soon as I see a mush like you that doesnt know anything about sports or gambling make a thread for a specific game I know I should bet the other way. You and a couple others on here are golden for that.

Happens all the time. Please continue posting your plays. 

And post your $7,000 Round Robins, so that if one ever hits when you are 92 years old (after you play $10,000 putting you 3K in the hole after all is said and done), you can be the toast of the forum. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 3083
Posted: #47
You are a super-duper big time mush...Your screen name and avatar are funny, but you constantly give out losers at an amzing clip w/ headlines that read something like what Mr.Bator would do....however, you're just a bator"master" of his domaine.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 6580
Posted: #48
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

Wow. Ok. 

The game can't end like a regular game (i.e. team with lead gets the defensive rebound, gets fouled, 2 FT's to win by 5 like the tens of thousands of others that end that way). Nope. Nets get off three shots after Kidd misses the FT to cover. Knicks are doing me good aren't they.

I'm gonna start buying hooks by the truckload. 

Anyhow, congrats Nets backers (ktrain). That was the right side for a motivated team tonight who pretty much lead coast to coast outside the last 3 min. I should have hit this line up last night when it opened at 3. 

Tough break on the finish Scal. I tailed your Denver play the other night and you deserved to win that one as well. The breaks will even out over the long haul.

BOL in the future.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2012
Posts: 7986
Posted: #49
Miss FT.....   Nothign I can say...
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #50
Quote Originally Posted by doliver517:

You are a super-duper big time mush...Your screen name and avatar are funny, but you constantly give out losers at an amzing clip w/ headlines that read something like what Mr.Bator would do....however, you're just a bator"master" of his domaine.

constantly give out losers...I've posted three times this year in this forum. Two of the losses by a combined 1.5 pts ATS.

Do you have any idea of what variance is? You probably couldn't even define it. 

Beat it, you're a joke just like the Hannibal Lecter wannabe above.
All Forums | NBA Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.