Full Game Totals: 11-13-1 -8.4 units Money Line Dogs: 2-1 +4.6 units
Team Totals: 2-1 +6.6 units
Total: 83-55-3 (60%) +92.40 Units
Went 2-1 last night and basically broke even giving a half of a unit back. The Pistons were never in that game. On to today.
Spurs/Lakers...1st Half...Over 98...4 Units...Throughout the playoffs in the 1st half at home the Lakers have averaged 111 total points; take out the two Denver games and this average drops by 4 points. On the road San Antonios defense has been better than any Western Conference team, including the Lakers and in their road games they have averaged 97 points in the first half. The interesting stat here is; that in the Spurs road games in the playoffs they are averaging 91 points in the second half, 6 points less than their first half average. If you look into the Lakers home stats for the same parameters you find a 116 second half point total, remember this when you place your second half wagers this evening. Essentially, this breaks down into a slow defensive start by the Spurs with a larger output of points in the first half, which over the last six road playoff games has backed up. Extended rest has not seemed to slow down the Lakers offensively and I expect them to score just below their 1st half average of 59 points and the Spurs to chip in a few points less than their 47 point road average in the first half and this half winds up in the low 100's.
Spurs/Lakers...Under 197...4 Units...I covered the statistics above for this play but two other factors need to be considered, a blowout and Spurs leading at the half. If the Lakers pull away by DD in the third look for this game to stay under the posted total. This will also stay well under if the Spurs manage to lead by any amount at halftime and play the second half as they have throughout the playoffs. Either way I see the second half being lower scoring than the first half if both teams come out of the gate as expected and as the numbers indicate.
Good luck everyone!
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
NBA Playoffs:
Quarter Sides: 11-7 +6.3 units
Quarter Totals: 1-3 -11.1 units
Half Sides: 6-6 -6.6 units
Half Totals: 42-18-3 +96.5 units
Full Game Sides: 7-7 +5.0 units
Full Game Totals: 11-13-1 -8.4 units Money Line Dogs: 2-1 +4.6 units
Team Totals: 2-1 +6.6 units
Total: 83-55-3 (60%) +92.40 Units
Went 2-1 last night and basically broke even giving a half of a unit back. The Pistons were never in that game. On to today.
Spurs/Lakers...1st Half...Over 98...4 Units...Throughout the playoffs in the 1st half at home the Lakers have averaged 111 total points; take out the two Denver games and this average drops by 4 points. On the road San Antonios defense has been better than any Western Conference team, including the Lakers and in their road games they have averaged 97 points in the first half. The interesting stat here is; that in the Spurs road games in the playoffs they are averaging 91 points in the second half, 6 points less than their first half average. If you look into the Lakers home stats for the same parameters you find a 116 second half point total, remember this when you place your second half wagers this evening. Essentially, this breaks down into a slow defensive start by the Spurs with a larger output of points in the first half, which over the last six road playoff games has backed up. Extended rest has not seemed to slow down the Lakers offensively and I expect them to score just below their 1st half average of 59 points and the Spurs to chip in a few points less than their 47 point road average in the first half and this half winds up in the low 100's.
Spurs/Lakers...Under 197...4 Units...I covered the statistics above for this play but two other factors need to be considered, a blowout and Spurs leading at the half. If the Lakers pull away by DD in the third look for this game to stay under the posted total. This will also stay well under if the Spurs manage to lead by any amount at halftime and play the second half as they have throughout the playoffs. Either way I see the second half being lower scoring than the first half if both teams come out of the gate as expected and as the numbers indicate.
Good luck, man. On first half under 99.5 and under 48 for Spurs.
You don't think the Pistons were ever in that game? I think it something that all the starters minus McDyess had either a terrible or below average game and for all but about two minutes it was within single digits. I will be on the Pistons in Game 2 for sure.
0
Good luck, man. On first half under 99.5 and under 48 for Spurs.
You don't think the Pistons were ever in that game? I think it something that all the starters minus McDyess had either a terrible or below average game and for all but about two minutes it was within single digits. I will be on the Pistons in Game 2 for sure.
Watching that game it seemed that when they were close they could not stop the next offensive push by the Celtics or they did make a stop and then took terrible shots at the other end. Either way, for a team that was well rested they were outplayed and had no chance at a SU win.
0
Watching that game it seemed that when they were close they could not stop the next offensive push by the Celtics or they did make a stop and then took terrible shots at the other end. Either way, for a team that was well rested they were outplayed and had no chance at a SU win.
Another GREAT write up Football...you hit the nail right on the head buddy
I'd much rather play an over - than sitting around sweating out an under, but I agree w/ wredskins about the 1Q total of 50 being too high (LAL/SAS avg 43.75 1Q pts this season). Factor in this is the 1st game of the series (lower initial shot%) and SAS's strong D, coupled w/ your point about the possibility of SAS taking an early lead...I can see this 1Q total falling under the posted 50.
I'm outta town in a couple hours...so good luck tonight & the rest of the week. I won't have int access until Sunday.
0
Another GREAT write up Football...you hit the nail right on the head buddy
I'd much rather play an over - than sitting around sweating out an under, but I agree w/ wredskins about the 1Q total of 50 being too high (LAL/SAS avg 43.75 1Q pts this season). Factor in this is the 1st game of the series (lower initial shot%) and SAS's strong D, coupled w/ your point about the possibility of SAS taking an early lead...I can see this 1Q total falling under the posted 50.
I'm outta town in a couple hours...so good luck tonight & the rest of the week. I won't have int access until Sunday.
Nice record on Half Totals. I agree with the 1H assessment going over. But I also have the full game going over. There is the danger of an LAL blowout which could certainly hurt over backers for the full game.
0
Nice record on Half Totals. I agree with the 1H assessment going over. But I also have the full game going over. There is the danger of an LAL blowout which could certainly hurt over backers for the full game.
Tight....Thanks and if this game stays close you may be correct unless it becomes a tight defensive game. My numbers indicated this over/under play with a 5-7 point margin for each play, so we will see. The larger wager will be on the second half if there is good value.
0
Tight....Thanks and if this game stays close you may be correct unless it becomes a tight defensive game. My numbers indicated this over/under play with a 5-7 point margin for each play, so we will see. The larger wager will be on the second half if there is good value.
Football, broken down by half, how are your 1H totals doing vs. your 2H totals. And overall, how are your half totals working out in the playoffs alone?
Are you seeing things in the playoffs half totals that you were/weren't expecting, and have you had to make adjustments?
0
Football, broken down by half, how are your 1H totals doing vs. your 2H totals. And overall, how are your half totals working out in the playoffs alone?
Are you seeing things in the playoffs half totals that you were/weren't expecting, and have you had to make adjustments?
hey 365 great detailed writeup. Interesting how you are betting over on the first half and then under for the game. I like under for the game a lot but would you still take it at 195.5?
thanks
cheeers
0
hey 365 great detailed writeup. Interesting how you are betting over on the first half and then under for the game. I like under for the game a lot but would you still take it at 195.5?
Tight...the numbers above are for the playoffs only and do not include my regular season record, as it has no relevance in my opinion. Regarding the breakdown in the 1st and 2nd half numbers they pan out about the same: 1st half 20-8-2 and the 2nd half 22-10-1. The pushes came in the second round and my second half selections have been marginal lately finishing around 60%, first half totals half faired a little better at 72%. Recently, I had two straight games that were handicapped correctly in the first half that had uncontested shots hit with less than 4 seconds. It happens and is part of the system.
The tough adjustments are ones that you make for Game 1 in a series as I put very little weight on regular season stats as a whole. Once a game is played and the further the series goes the statistical data I use becomes "real", so to speak, and allows me to find better margins and create better value. I am working on a spreadsheet that will track my wagers for each round for each bet to see the increase or decrease in winning percentage as it relates to "real" and relative data. This is something I have developed and fine tuned over the years as it relates to football but I am adapting this system to basketball in an effort to stay around 70% over a 150 wager period. So far, I have been as high as 68% and as low as 58% with no particular "favorite" bet other than looking at all possible angles, hence the variety in my slections and record. I think I got off track a bit. I do make adjustments to my handicapping from game to game. The common trend for the totals thus far in the playoffs, whether quarter, half or game, has been how sharp they are and how often they hit within 1-2 points, which is prime territory for a good ole fashion backdoor beating.
I hope in that mess I answered your questions.
0
Tight...the numbers above are for the playoffs only and do not include my regular season record, as it has no relevance in my opinion. Regarding the breakdown in the 1st and 2nd half numbers they pan out about the same: 1st half 20-8-2 and the 2nd half 22-10-1. The pushes came in the second round and my second half selections have been marginal lately finishing around 60%, first half totals half faired a little better at 72%. Recently, I had two straight games that were handicapped correctly in the first half that had uncontested shots hit with less than 4 seconds. It happens and is part of the system.
The tough adjustments are ones that you make for Game 1 in a series as I put very little weight on regular season stats as a whole. Once a game is played and the further the series goes the statistical data I use becomes "real", so to speak, and allows me to find better margins and create better value. I am working on a spreadsheet that will track my wagers for each round for each bet to see the increase or decrease in winning percentage as it relates to "real" and relative data. This is something I have developed and fine tuned over the years as it relates to football but I am adapting this system to basketball in an effort to stay around 70% over a 150 wager period. So far, I have been as high as 68% and as low as 58% with no particular "favorite" bet other than looking at all possible angles, hence the variety in my slections and record. I think I got off track a bit. I do make adjustments to my handicapping from game to game. The common trend for the totals thus far in the playoffs, whether quarter, half or game, has been how sharp they are and how often they hit within 1-2 points, which is prime territory for a good ole fashion backdoor beating.
Thanks for the information....I think you got a rare gift and you certainly have my support even when I do not tail you.....was pushing for you last night and glad to see it come through for you.... Good luck ....
0
Thanks for the information....I think you got a rare gift and you certainly have my support even when I do not tail you.....was pushing for you last night and glad to see it come through for you.... Good luck ....
TheGreat...In my analysis the +7' is not enough of a margin to make a wager in this situation, meaning Game 1. If it gets pushed to +9 then the margins increase and I would place a wager but unless I want to buy it up (I never buy points) I do not think it will get pushed that high. I do like the Spurs in this situation but in handicapping this matchup I feel my margins are higher with the totals.
BOL tonight.
0
TheGreat...In my analysis the +7' is not enough of a margin to make a wager in this situation, meaning Game 1. If it gets pushed to +9 then the margins increase and I would place a wager but unless I want to buy it up (I never buy points) I do not think it will get pushed that high. I do like the Spurs in this situation but in handicapping this matchup I feel my margins are higher with the totals.
Football, answered all my questions. Thanks. 1H can be more consistent from a numbers standpoint, with 2H being more situational based on the performance in 1H, so I see where you're coming from.
I have taken my fair share of beatings as well with last second shots. I think I will join you on the 1H over. Thanks for the insight.
0
Football, answered all my questions. Thanks. 1H can be more consistent from a numbers standpoint, with 2H being more situational based on the performance in 1H, so I see where you're coming from.
I have taken my fair share of beatings as well with last second shots. I think I will join you on the 1H over. Thanks for the insight.
cheeers...at 196 your bet was good but you should have reduced your wager amount at 195' not increase it. Like I said above it is becoming marginal at 195' warranting a lower unit bet.
0
cheeers...at 196 your bet was good but you should have reduced your wager amount at 195' not increase it. Like I said above it is becoming marginal at 195' warranting a lower unit bet.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.