Thanks. I didnt mention it but I was interested to see in what order it was considered when handicapping. 
TONS of value. Thanks for your input. I was thinking 70%, too. But like the guy before you said a different percentage consensus can mean different things with different shifts in the line. I guess the main thing im realizing is that you just always, always need to be aware of why the line is what it is and why it is moving the direction it is. Capping ain't easy....
I'm a contrarian bettor and use line movement in my equations, however, let's not forget that Vegas knows that we all look at line movement too. Many times that little half point reverse movement is to throw the big money movers, e.g. the sharps, off the trail. You have to be careful with this. Sometimes Vegas will feint the jab and knock you out with a straight right..
Teddy Sevransky has a nice article on his page that is relevant to this topic entitled "sharps vs squares". it's worth a read.
I'm a contrarian bettor and use line movement in my equations, however, let's not forget that Vegas knows that we all look at line movement too. Many times that little half point reverse movement is to throw the big money movers, e.g. the sharps, off the trail. You have to be careful with this. Sometimes Vegas will feint the jab and knock you out with a straight right..
Teddy Sevransky has a nice article on his page that is relevant to this topic entitled "sharps vs squares". it's worth a read.
I'm a contrarian bettor and use line movement in my equations, however, let's not forget that Vegas knows that we all look at line movement too. Many times that little half point reverse movement is to throw the big money movers, e.g. the sharps, off the trail. You have to be careful with this. Sometimes Vegas will feint the jab and knock you out with a straight right..
Teddy Sevransky has a nice article on his page that is relevant to this topic entitled "sharps vs squares". it's worth a read.
Established in 1995,
WTF. 
Hot Forum Topics
