Well, so far your system is doing well with totals. That does not surprise me. Let's assume for the sake of argument that your system is statistics-based. That would lend itself to totals over sides.
It's awfully hard to put a better line than the books on a game. They hire very good people and pay them well, and then they release their line to the sharps to get feedback from the best bettors before you and I can bet into the line. Ouch. No wonder they're good.
I also chuckle when some guy says he has "made a line" for the game and it shows that the books' line is off. Chances are that his line is off, and the books saw something he did not.
I don't use statistics to handicap. I look for intangibles (let-down situations; revenge matchups; key injuries; etc) because they are hard to quantify. The oddsmaker doesn't really know how much to adjust the line for a motivational mismatch. He's guessing, and I can guess as well as he can.
Totals, on the other hand, seem to be handicappable with statistical methods. I am not sure why, but a bettor with a good system really can do well on totals. I used to track pro handicappers, and though most of them can't do any better than about 52%, the ones who made money often did it on totals.
Just an observation. Hope this works for you.
0
Well, so far your system is doing well with totals. That does not surprise me. Let's assume for the sake of argument that your system is statistics-based. That would lend itself to totals over sides.
It's awfully hard to put a better line than the books on a game. They hire very good people and pay them well, and then they release their line to the sharps to get feedback from the best bettors before you and I can bet into the line. Ouch. No wonder they're good.
I also chuckle when some guy says he has "made a line" for the game and it shows that the books' line is off. Chances are that his line is off, and the books saw something he did not.
I don't use statistics to handicap. I look for intangibles (let-down situations; revenge matchups; key injuries; etc) because they are hard to quantify. The oddsmaker doesn't really know how much to adjust the line for a motivational mismatch. He's guessing, and I can guess as well as he can.
Totals, on the other hand, seem to be handicappable with statistical methods. I am not sure why, but a bettor with a good system really can do well on totals. I used to track pro handicappers, and though most of them can't do any better than about 52%, the ones who made money often did it on totals.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.