Early on in this thread, all DevilFan was trying to do was dicsuss the game that puck had picked. Puck said he just plays what he is told, so he will not discuss the game.
The rest of you "passengers", instead of discussing, just add things like "Going keep riding the train with you puck".
DevilFan was merely trying to point out some things about the game and you numbnuts just want to say he is bashing.
Discussing is not bashing people, get a clue.
As you were.
PocketJacks
As I said earlier, stating one's opinion is not bashing and DevilFan is a good capper, so he's statement is worth listening.
But when there was this "Calling Pucku to discuss the play" thing, it was quite unnecessary, because Pucku has many times stated why he makes these "TO THE BANK" plays...
What comes to the "passengers", if someone is blindly tailing and he has decided to do that, no reason will sway him/her.
And still there are those, who are his friends, but can think of their own, make their own decisions and are even making their own plays... To them DF's opinion is welcomed, but they don't want to see needless degrading of the OP.
And again .
0
Quote Originally Posted by PocketJacks:
When are all you "passengers" going to learn?
Early on in this thread, all DevilFan was trying to do was dicsuss the game that puck had picked. Puck said he just plays what he is told, so he will not discuss the game.
The rest of you "passengers", instead of discussing, just add things like "Going keep riding the train with you puck".
DevilFan was merely trying to point out some things about the game and you numbnuts just want to say he is bashing.
Discussing is not bashing people, get a clue.
As you were.
PocketJacks
As I said earlier, stating one's opinion is not bashing and DevilFan is a good capper, so he's statement is worth listening.
But when there was this "Calling Pucku to discuss the play" thing, it was quite unnecessary, because Pucku has many times stated why he makes these "TO THE BANK" plays...
What comes to the "passengers", if someone is blindly tailing and he has decided to do that, no reason will sway him/her.
And still there are those, who are his friends, but can think of their own, make their own decisions and are even making their own plays... To them DF's opinion is welcomed, but they don't want to see needless degrading of the OP.
bunch of babies around here. bling and devilfan for sure and then we have a bunch of little girls creating aliases. get on the train, get off the train, who freaking cares. get a life.
0
bunch of babies around here. bling and devilfan for sure and then we have a bunch of little girls creating aliases. get on the train, get off the train, who freaking cares. get a life.
Early on in this thread, all DevilFan was trying to do was dicsuss the game that puck had picked. Puck said he just plays what he is told, so he will not discuss the game.
The rest of you "passengers", instead of discussing, just add things like "Going keep riding the train with you puck".
DevilFan was merely trying to point out some things about the game and you numbnuts just want to say he is bashing.
Discussing is not bashing people, get a clue.
As you were.
Hey Pocket, quote from DF early on
"A terrible road team laying 8 points on the road on a B2B against a decent home team. If you are still on the train, I advise getting off at the next stop. If the train doesn't stop, jump out the window. Risk the injury."
You call this discussing the game. Read ALL the remarks b4 you jump in. If people have a good argument or stats, fine, state them, but why the sarcastic remarks??? It only invites more sarcasm.
0
Quote Originally Posted by PocketJacks:
When are all you "passengers" going to learn?
Early on in this thread, all DevilFan was trying to do was dicsuss the game that puck had picked. Puck said he just plays what he is told, so he will not discuss the game.
The rest of you "passengers", instead of discussing, just add things like "Going keep riding the train with you puck".
DevilFan was merely trying to point out some things about the game and you numbnuts just want to say he is bashing.
Discussing is not bashing people, get a clue.
As you were.
Hey Pocket, quote from DF early on
"A terrible road team laying 8 points on the road on a B2B against a decent home team. If you are still on the train, I advise getting off at the next stop. If the train doesn't stop, jump out the window. Risk the injury."
You call this discussing the game. Read ALL the remarks b4 you jump in. If people have a good argument or stats, fine, state them, but why the sarcastic remarks??? It only invites more sarcasm.
"A terrible road team laying 8 points on the road on a B2B against a decent home team. If you are still on the train, I advise getting off at the next stop. If the train doesn't stop, jump out the window. Risk the injury."
You call this discussing the game. Read ALL the remarks b4 you jump in. If people have a good argument or stats, fine, state them, but why the sarcastic remarks??? It only invites more sarcasm.
Sarcasm or not, he was at least bringing something pertaining to the game to the table.
I am not lumping everyone in this thread as a passenger, but I don't remember seeing one person coming back with "info" or "numbers" to combat what DevilFan thought of the game.
99% of the people in this thread could not discuss a game for one side or the other. I am not including Pucku in this, cause he said he just plays what he is told.
But, the rest of the people in this thread could come up with something as to why they would take the same side or why others might want to look at the other side.
I really don't think Pucku cares if someone comes in here with stats and info for the other side, cause he does not look at that stuff anyways.
Like I said earlier, DevilFan threw something out there as caution for tailing this play, and as I said, I don't remember anyone coming in here saying why Utah was the right side.
0
Quote Originally Posted by seaotter:
Hey Pocket, quote from DF early on
"A terrible road team laying 8 points on the road on a B2B against a decent home team. If you are still on the train, I advise getting off at the next stop. If the train doesn't stop, jump out the window. Risk the injury."
You call this discussing the game. Read ALL the remarks b4 you jump in. If people have a good argument or stats, fine, state them, but why the sarcastic remarks??? It only invites more sarcasm.
Sarcasm or not, he was at least bringing something pertaining to the game to the table.
I am not lumping everyone in this thread as a passenger, but I don't remember seeing one person coming back with "info" or "numbers" to combat what DevilFan thought of the game.
99% of the people in this thread could not discuss a game for one side or the other. I am not including Pucku in this, cause he said he just plays what he is told.
But, the rest of the people in this thread could come up with something as to why they would take the same side or why others might want to look at the other side.
I really don't think Pucku cares if someone comes in here with stats and info for the other side, cause he does not look at that stuff anyways.
Like I said earlier, DevilFan threw something out there as caution for tailing this play, and as I said, I don't remember anyone coming in here saying why Utah was the right side.
hey puck all i was trying to say earlier is that this site is for sharing info and picks. Posting a game after its posted started time (not necessarily actual start time), kinda defeats the purpose. In fact all it does is bring devilfan in here to talk shit, i think most ppl would agree that indy -8 was available.
0
hey puck all i was trying to say earlier is that this site is for sharing info and picks. Posting a game after its posted started time (not necessarily actual start time), kinda defeats the purpose. In fact all it does is bring devilfan in here to talk shit, i think most ppl would agree that indy -8 was available.
Man you guys fight like babies, who care who's lying or not, it not like your life is being affected b/c someone on a public forum is lying or not. I thought most of people on here are men's but i think it's mostly kids running around here. Men's do not waste their time on things that does not affect them in life.
0
Man you guys fight like babies, who care who's lying or not, it not like your life is being affected b/c someone on a public forum is lying or not. I thought most of people on here are men's but i think it's mostly kids running around here. Men's do not waste their time on things that does not affect them in life.
I already had this on my card and I think anyone is safe to unload on Utah tonight. By unload I dont mean half your bankroll and anything stupid like that. When I "unload" it's anywhere from 5 to 10 per cent of my bankroll.
Let's do it!
0
Thanks Puck...
I already had this on my card and I think anyone is safe to unload on Utah tonight. By unload I dont mean half your bankroll and anything stupid like that. When I "unload" it's anywhere from 5 to 10 per cent of my bankroll.
Pack......... just ignore the haters........ they do not even deserve the diginity of a response.......
Well said. There are some people you literally cannot argue with. Think about: Would you seriously argue with a 5 yr old about anything? No, you wouldn't. Unless the 5 yr old is an extremely gifted child, it wouldn't make sense to argue with him. In fact, it's just stupid.
0
Quote Originally Posted by AtlFader:
Pack......... just ignore the haters........ they do not even deserve the diginity of a response.......
Well said. There are some people you literally cannot argue with. Think about: Would you seriously argue with a 5 yr old about anything? No, you wouldn't. Unless the 5 yr old is an extremely gifted child, it wouldn't make sense to argue with him. In fact, it's just stupid.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.