Miami is 2nd to last. The bottom 5 include : Orlando, Miami, Portland, Indiana, and New York.
If Dirk is on fire, Dallas will have a field day. Dirk 1 on 1? Dirk wins. Dirk double teamed? Hes 7 feet tall hell just spot the open man like hes done all series.
Who on Dallas are catch and shooters? Everyone under 7 feet tall except Marion, but he's more of a slasher and D beast.
When theres a series between D-Rose and no one else against LBJ, Wade, and Bosh with no one else, then the 3 stars better win that series. They won't win ANY games playing like they did last night.
fact
The top 2 indicators in the NBA final are FG% and rebounding, not assists.
When 1 team is better in both indicators it's a perfiect 10-0 at winning the series.
FG% diff.
Miami 4.7%
Mavs 2.5%
rebounds
Heat 50.35%
Mavs 49.46%
Add to this, when the no.1 key indicator FG% diff is 2% or better it's 10-2 at winning the series
Add to this, of the 31 teams to win the NBA title since 1980, just 4 (12.9%) were under 50% rebounds.
To be honest, I wouldn't waste my money betting on Dallas, barring any injuries to the key Heat players, Dallas has little chance to win the series and it may not be all that close.
0
Quote Originally Posted by OUfanAP12:
Thats all you need to know.
Dallas leads the playoffs in assist/game
Miami is 2nd to last. The bottom 5 include : Orlando, Miami, Portland, Indiana, and New York.
If Dirk is on fire, Dallas will have a field day. Dirk 1 on 1? Dirk wins. Dirk double teamed? Hes 7 feet tall hell just spot the open man like hes done all series.
Who on Dallas are catch and shooters? Everyone under 7 feet tall except Marion, but he's more of a slasher and D beast.
When theres a series between D-Rose and no one else against LBJ, Wade, and Bosh with no one else, then the 3 stars better win that series. They won't win ANY games playing like they did last night.
fact
The top 2 indicators in the NBA final are FG% and rebounding, not assists.
When 1 team is better in both indicators it's a perfiect 10-0 at winning the series.
FG% diff.
Miami 4.7%
Mavs 2.5%
rebounds
Heat 50.35%
Mavs 49.46%
Add to this, when the no.1 key indicator FG% diff is 2% or better it's 10-2 at winning the series
Add to this, of the 31 teams to win the NBA title since 1980, just 4 (12.9%) were under 50% rebounds.
To be honest, I wouldn't waste my money betting on Dallas, barring any injuries to the key Heat players, Dallas has little chance to win the series and it may not be all that close.
The top 2 indicators in the NBA final are FG% and rebounding, not assists.
When 1 team is better in both indicators it's a perfiect 10-0 at winning the series.
FG% diff.
Miami 4.7%
Mavs 2.5%
rebounds
Heat 50.35%
Mavs 49.46%
Add to this, when the no.1 key indicator FG% diff is 2% or better it's 10-2 at winning the series
Add to this, of the 31 teams to win the NBA title since 1980, just 4 (12.9%) were under 50% rebounds.
To be honest, I wouldn't waste my money betting on Dallas, barring any injuries to the key Heat players, Dallas has little chance to win the series and it may not be all that close.
0
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:
The top 2 indicators in the NBA final are FG% and rebounding, not assists.
When 1 team is better in both indicators it's a perfiect 10-0 at winning the series.
FG% diff.
Miami 4.7%
Mavs 2.5%
rebounds
Heat 50.35%
Mavs 49.46%
Add to this, when the no.1 key indicator FG% diff is 2% or better it's 10-2 at winning the series
Add to this, of the 31 teams to win the NBA title since 1980, just 4 (12.9%) were under 50% rebounds.
To be honest, I wouldn't waste my money betting on Dallas, barring any injuries to the key Heat players, Dallas has little chance to win the series and it may not be all that close.
"One last statistic that stands out is( dallas has beaten miami 20 of the last 22 games including 14 straight)"
ok. i'm no rocket scientist, correct me if i'm wrong. how is this statement even true? lets see its been 5 years since the 2006 finals. nba teams from opposing conferences play each other twice a year. so since then, the mavs are 10-0 vs mia. BUT MIAMI won FOUR straight games before that. ?!?!. unless you are counting some preseason games and still that statement is still wrong.... and by the way HEAT 2011 CHAMPS.
0
"One last statistic that stands out is( dallas has beaten miami 20 of the last 22 games including 14 straight)"
ok. i'm no rocket scientist, correct me if i'm wrong. how is this statement even true? lets see its been 5 years since the 2006 finals. nba teams from opposing conferences play each other twice a year. so since then, the mavs are 10-0 vs mia. BUT MIAMI won FOUR straight games before that. ?!?!. unless you are counting some preseason games and still that statement is still wrong.... and by the way HEAT 2011 CHAMPS.
"One last statistic that stands out is( dallas has beaten miami 20 of the last 22 games including 14 straight)"
ok. i'm no rocket scientist, correct me if i'm wrong. how is this statement even true? lets see its been 5 years since the 2006 finals. nba teams from opposing conferences play each other twice a year. so since then, the mavs are 10-0 vs mia. BUT MIAMI won FOUR straight games before that. ?!?!. unless you are counting some preseason games and still that statement is still wrong.... and by the way HEAT 2011 CHAMPS.
forget 2006 playoffs the mavs are 20-22 in regular season games... 16-4 if you include the fix in 2006... miami has yet to beat dallas since 06 https://oddsshark.com/Stats/DBHeadToHead/Basketball/NBA/6/20/Any/14/Any/0/0
0
Quote Originally Posted by nonstop82:
"One last statistic that stands out is( dallas has beaten miami 20 of the last 22 games including 14 straight)"
ok. i'm no rocket scientist, correct me if i'm wrong. how is this statement even true? lets see its been 5 years since the 2006 finals. nba teams from opposing conferences play each other twice a year. so since then, the mavs are 10-0 vs mia. BUT MIAMI won FOUR straight games before that. ?!?!. unless you are counting some preseason games and still that statement is still wrong.... and by the way HEAT 2011 CHAMPS.
forget 2006 playoffs the mavs are 20-22 in regular season games... 16-4 if you include the fix in 2006... miami has yet to beat dallas since 06 https://oddsshark.com/Stats/DBHeadToHead/Basketball/NBA/6/20/Any/14/Any/0/0
miami has not seen an offense like dallas yet in all the playoffs. miami plays too much 1 on 1 basketball. remember TEAM wins games not 1 person. keep throwing your money on miami but my money going to be on dallas for the series ONLY
0
miami has not seen an offense like dallas yet in all the playoffs. miami plays too much 1 on 1 basketball. remember TEAM wins games not 1 person. keep throwing your money on miami but my money going to be on dallas for the series ONLY
The top 2 indicators in the NBA final are FG% and rebounding, not assists.
When 1 team is better in both indicators it's a perfiect 10-0 at winning the series.
FG% diff.
Miami 4.7%
Mavs 2.5%
rebounds
Heat 50.35%
Mavs 49.46%
Add to this, when the no.1 key indicator FG% diff is 2% or better it's 10-2 at winning the series
Add to this, of the 31 teams to win the NBA title since 1980, just 4 (12.9%) were under 50% rebounds.
To be honest, I wouldn't waste my money betting on Dallas, barring any injuries to the key Heat players, Dallas has little chance to win the series and it may not be all that close.
0
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:
The top 2 indicators in the NBA final are FG% and rebounding, not assists.
When 1 team is better in both indicators it's a perfiect 10-0 at winning the series.
FG% diff.
Miami 4.7%
Mavs 2.5%
rebounds
Heat 50.35%
Mavs 49.46%
Add to this, when the no.1 key indicator FG% diff is 2% or better it's 10-2 at winning the series
Add to this, of the 31 teams to win the NBA title since 1980, just 4 (12.9%) were under 50% rebounds.
To be honest, I wouldn't waste my money betting on Dallas, barring any injuries to the key Heat players, Dallas has little chance to win the series and it may not be all that close.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.