i will continue to fade the public. public is all over an away team. we saw what happen with spurs on sunday, okc monday, and knicks and golden state yestd. all public road darlings and they all lost.
75% on memphis and okc at home.okc with no b-super star, down 1-3 and giving 4? hmmmmm..fishy fishyyyy
keep in mind, okc has not covered one game in this series. memphis is 9-1 last 10 covering 9 in a row.
okc is due for a cover.
okc biggggg
0
okc -4...
i will continue to fade the public. public is all over an away team. we saw what happen with spurs on sunday, okc monday, and knicks and golden state yestd. all public road darlings and they all lost.
75% on memphis and okc at home.okc with no b-super star, down 1-3 and giving 4? hmmmmm..fishy fishyyyy
keep in mind, okc has not covered one game in this series. memphis is 9-1 last 10 covering 9 in a row.
Just some advice, I would not bet the team is "Due" angle. Please see the DEN/GS series. GS covered all 6 games. This MEM/OKC match up is eerily similar. OKC is the better team, but without Westbrook, they are not. DEN was the better team vs. GS, but they were missing a key player in Gallinari. He is not a superstar, but he was valuable.
Here is a casino reference for you: If red has hit 10 times in a row on roulette, do you bet black because it is "due" or do you bet red because it is "hot?" I bet red. In gambling you follow the hot streak, not the cold one. MEM is hot and OKC is not. They know that they cannot win 3 straight. OKC may very well win tonight, but I would rather have my money on the team with no pressure and is streaking right now.
Good luck whatever you decide.
0
Just some advice, I would not bet the team is "Due" angle. Please see the DEN/GS series. GS covered all 6 games. This MEM/OKC match up is eerily similar. OKC is the better team, but without Westbrook, they are not. DEN was the better team vs. GS, but they were missing a key player in Gallinari. He is not a superstar, but he was valuable.
Here is a casino reference for you: If red has hit 10 times in a row on roulette, do you bet black because it is "due" or do you bet red because it is "hot?" I bet red. In gambling you follow the hot streak, not the cold one. MEM is hot and OKC is not. They know that they cannot win 3 straight. OKC may very well win tonight, but I would rather have my money on the team with no pressure and is streaking right now.
Just some advice, I would not bet the team is "Due" angle. Please see the DEN/GS series. GS covered all 6 games. This MEM/OKC match up is eerily similar. OKC is the better team, but without Westbrook, they are not. DEN was the better team vs. GS, but they were missing a key player in Gallinari. He is not a superstar, but he was valuable.
Here is a casino reference for you: If red has hit 10 times in a row on roulette, do you bet black because it is "due" or do you bet red because it is "hot?" I bet red. In gambling you follow the hot streak, not the cold one. MEM is hot and OKC is not. They know that they cannot win 3 straight. OKC may very well win tonight, but I would rather have my money on the team with no pressure and is streaking right now.
Good luck whatever you decide.
Fantastic.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bookiekilla:
Just some advice, I would not bet the team is "Due" angle. Please see the DEN/GS series. GS covered all 6 games. This MEM/OKC match up is eerily similar. OKC is the better team, but without Westbrook, they are not. DEN was the better team vs. GS, but they were missing a key player in Gallinari. He is not a superstar, but he was valuable.
Here is a casino reference for you: If red has hit 10 times in a row on roulette, do you bet black because it is "due" or do you bet red because it is "hot?" I bet red. In gambling you follow the hot streak, not the cold one. MEM is hot and OKC is not. They know that they cannot win 3 straight. OKC may very well win tonight, but I would rather have my money on the team with no pressure and is streaking right now.
It's a decent strategy, but just don't underestimate a squares luck. One can go in a streak regardless of capping skill. Im sure u would have got smacked in round 1 fading the public.
0
It's a decent strategy, but just don't underestimate a squares luck. One can go in a streak regardless of capping skill. Im sure u would have got smacked in round 1 fading the public.
Just some advice, I would not bet the team is "Due" angle. Please see the DEN/GS series. GS covered all 6 games. This MEM/OKC match up is eerily similar. OKC is the better team, but without Westbrook, they are not. DEN was the better team vs. GS, but they were missing a key player in Gallinari. He is not a superstar, but he was valuable.
Here is a casino reference for you: If red has hit 10 times in a row on roulette, do you bet black because it is "due" or do you bet red because it is "hot?" I bet red. In gambling you follow the hot streak, not the cold one. MEM is hot and OKC is not. They know that they cannot win 3 straight. OKC may very well win tonight, but I would rather have my money on the team with no pressure and is streaking right now.
Good luck whatever you decide.
There is a difference between being "due" and having pride
0
Quote Originally Posted by bookiekilla:
Just some advice, I would not bet the team is "Due" angle. Please see the DEN/GS series. GS covered all 6 games. This MEM/OKC match up is eerily similar. OKC is the better team, but without Westbrook, they are not. DEN was the better team vs. GS, but they were missing a key player in Gallinari. He is not a superstar, but he was valuable.
Here is a casino reference for you: If red has hit 10 times in a row on roulette, do you bet black because it is "due" or do you bet red because it is "hot?" I bet red. In gambling you follow the hot streak, not the cold one. MEM is hot and OKC is not. They know that they cannot win 3 straight. OKC may very well win tonight, but I would rather have my money on the team with no pressure and is streaking right now.
Good luck whatever you decide.
There is a difference between being "due" and having pride
i will continue to fade the public. public is all over an away team. we saw what happen with spurs on sunday, okc monday, and knicks and golden state yestd. all public road darlings and they all lost.
75% on memphis and okc at home.okc with no b-super star, down 1-3 and giving 4? hmmmmm..fishy fishyyyy
keep in mind, okc has not covered one game in this series. memphis is 9-1 last 10 covering 9 in a row.
okc is due for a cover.
okc biggggg
LOSS
0
Quote Originally Posted by infamous-mobb:
okc -4...
i will continue to fade the public. public is all over an away team. we saw what happen with spurs on sunday, okc monday, and knicks and golden state yestd. all public road darlings and they all lost.
75% on memphis and okc at home.okc with no b-super star, down 1-3 and giving 4? hmmmmm..fishy fishyyyy
keep in mind, okc has not covered one game in this series. memphis is 9-1 last 10 covering 9 in a row.
I agree with the idea but I would never make a pick simply to fade someone. They are really pretty junk and I dunno why he titles that topic "...I've won money this past year! See how!..."
0
I agree with the idea but I would never make a pick simply to fade someone. They are really pretty junk and I dunno why he titles that topic "...I've won money this past year! See how!..."
I agree with the idea but I would never make a pick simply to fade someone. They are really pretty junk and I dunno why he titles that topic "...I've won money this past year! See how!..."
0
I agree with the idea but I would never make a pick simply to fade someone. They are really pretty junk and I dunno why he titles that topic "...I've won money this past year! See how!..."
It's pretty hilarious that you pointed this out because I always thought the same thing. I always thought the title of the topic was such a laugh (as are most gamblers who claim to win all the time )
0
It's pretty hilarious that you pointed this out because I always thought the same thing. I always thought the title of the topic was such a laugh (as are most gamblers who claim to win all the time )
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.