Gl invest. I would say Celts +7 is a faily safe bet but them money line I have to disagree. Perkins means more than you would know. Celtics don't like to double team the post and he was the number 1 rated defender in the post in terms of FG% and points against. Also the team who won the battle on the boards has won ever game this series:
Game 1: Lakers +9
Game 2: C's +5
Game 3: Lakers +7
Game 4: C's+7
Game 5: C's+1
Game 6: Lakers+15
No inside post defender to count on. KG has shown up but he also been dominated at times. Lakers bench plays muchc better at home. The C's bench loses Sheed from it and Tony Allen is not a scorer. We saw Sheldon Williams just does not belong. I think it will be within the 7 but I have to disagree with the ML play. Either way gl buddy.
Gl invest. I would say Celts +7 is a faily safe bet but them money line I have to disagree. Perkins means more than you would know. Celtics don't like to double team the post and he was the number 1 rated defender in the post in terms of FG% and points against. Also the team who won the battle on the boards has won ever game this series:
Game 1: Lakers +9
Game 2: C's +5
Game 3: Lakers +7
Game 4: C's+7
Game 5: C's+1
Game 6: Lakers+15
No inside post defender to count on. KG has shown up but he also been dominated at times. Lakers bench plays muchc better at home. The C's bench loses Sheed from it and Tony Allen is not a scorer. We saw Sheldon Williams just does not belong. I think it will be within the 7 but I have to disagree with the ML play. Either way gl buddy.
gl i4y
since this is the last game of the season, just wanted to say thanks for all you did this season. i know how much work it takes to post everyday, keep an acurate record etc. thanks for your hard work.
see you next season ![]()
gl i4y
since this is the last game of the season, just wanted to say thanks for all you did this season. i know how much work it takes to post everyday, keep an acurate record etc. thanks for your hard work.
see you next season ![]()
Investments, question for you......
I see you occasionally buy some points to get yourself a better spread. Tonight I see some very bad touts advising people to buy a half point from 7 to 7.5, and I see this often.
From my point of view, I can't understand why I would want to pay another 10% on my bet just for a half point? Mathematically it just doesn't make sense to me. Would a 0.5 point impact an outcome enough times to recoup the extra 10% you pay on all the games where it has no impact at all?
Any technical/statistical explanation behind you occasionally buying points?
Investments, question for you......
I see you occasionally buy some points to get yourself a better spread. Tonight I see some very bad touts advising people to buy a half point from 7 to 7.5, and I see this often.
From my point of view, I can't understand why I would want to pay another 10% on my bet just for a half point? Mathematically it just doesn't make sense to me. Would a 0.5 point impact an outcome enough times to recoup the extra 10% you pay on all the games where it has no impact at all?
Any technical/statistical explanation behind you occasionally buying points?

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.