This is a long shot and could very well lose but at 6 to 1 odds I have to roll the dice.
I wonder where LeBron wants to go? If Lakers lose tonight, he gets 2 at home against Hou and maybe Luka comes back in a longer series. If Lakers want to extend a series, this is most likely chance. This may be the best scenario for the League as it gets maybe just maybe a Lakers entertaining series where Luka comes back and maybe Lakers beat Hou. Lakers want to buy time at this point, longer they play, more likley they get Luka and maybe Reaves back.Longer series, mo money.
If Lakers win tonight, then he gets 2 at home against Wolves in what could be an evisceration sweep for Minny. Interestingly Lebron has avoided Wolves all season since that 1st round series 4-1 playoff loss last year. He didn't suit up once in their regular season series this year, hmm...Shorter series, less money, less time to get Luka back.
If Jazz win, they still finish bottom 5 and keep their top 8 protected pick.
So in short, if Lakers want to buy as much time to get Luka and Reaves back, I think their best bet is to face Houston. That seems like a possible 4-3 series whereas playing Wolves Lakers could get swept 4-0 or 4-1 loss with not enough time for Luka to come back. The diff bt/w a quick series and a long series is 5 extra days.
And a Lakers loss pits Nuggs against Wolves in a death match.
undertaker
2
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
ML +625
This is a long shot and could very well lose but at 6 to 1 odds I have to roll the dice.
I wonder where LeBron wants to go? If Lakers lose tonight, he gets 2 at home against Hou and maybe Luka comes back in a longer series. If Lakers want to extend a series, this is most likely chance. This may be the best scenario for the League as it gets maybe just maybe a Lakers entertaining series where Luka comes back and maybe Lakers beat Hou. Lakers want to buy time at this point, longer they play, more likley they get Luka and maybe Reaves back.Longer series, mo money.
If Lakers win tonight, then he gets 2 at home against Wolves in what could be an evisceration sweep for Minny. Interestingly Lebron has avoided Wolves all season since that 1st round series 4-1 playoff loss last year. He didn't suit up once in their regular season series this year, hmm...Shorter series, less money, less time to get Luka back.
If Jazz win, they still finish bottom 5 and keep their top 8 protected pick.
So in short, if Lakers want to buy as much time to get Luka and Reaves back, I think their best bet is to face Houston. That seems like a possible 4-3 series whereas playing Wolves Lakers could get swept 4-0 or 4-1 loss with not enough time for Luka to come back. The diff bt/w a quick series and a long series is 5 extra days.
And a Lakers loss pits Nuggs against Wolves in a death match.
I didn't read your post, but I just wanted to say that I typed out something for every game today and this game and one other game were the only two that I had straight up money line underdog… I think it's at least 50-50, which are great odds
0
@StraightWagers
I didn't read your post, but I just wanted to say that I typed out something for every game today and this game and one other game were the only two that I had straight up money line underdog… I think it's at least 50-50, which are great odds
I tend to overthink things and am wondering with the proliferation of gambling are the smart bettors now the lemmings? Meaning, back in the day 10-15 years ago those gamblers that put in the work got somewhat rewarded. Now it seems that has been factored in to the equation as everyone has access to the same info (expect those truly in the know) and now the smart gamblers are getting skinned alive. The proclivity of favs to the over used to be squares, now not so much. I wonder if I'm being set up by over thinking the obvious.
undertaker
2
I tend to overthink things and am wondering with the proliferation of gambling are the smart bettors now the lemmings? Meaning, back in the day 10-15 years ago those gamblers that put in the work got somewhat rewarded. Now it seems that has been factored in to the equation as everyone has access to the same info (expect those truly in the know) and now the smart gamblers are getting skinned alive. The proclivity of favs to the over used to be squares, now not so much. I wonder if I'm being set up by over thinking the obvious.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.