Posted:
#26
Betting horrible teams against good teams will bite you in the a$$ eventually.
0
*** Houston Rockets @ Sacramento Kings ***
Posted:
#27
I want to see more covers forum members have a commonsense of appreciating the hard work and information. When I visit LC's thread, I don't just check his picks. Rather, I am more interested in the way he formulate his selections using the existing information, the way he reaches to his conclusion, that thought process. So, in that sense, whether his picks fail or not, there's always something to learn. Look. Aporeciating his angles and following his picks are two different thing, aren't they? He asks no money, he asks no money, no compliment. Whether you tail him or not, it's you who make final decisions. So it is very immature to criticize him for failing picks. On the contrary, we need to be more appreciative of him showing how one handicapper reaches to his conclusions with data analysis. He doesn't force or beg you to tail him.
Thanks LC for your hard work.
Thanks LC for your hard work.
0
Posted:
#28
Quote Originally Posted by ghostfaceripper:
wtf??? He was cut for a reason. The guy had hardly any minutes. I dont know if you watched Sac games but sometimes the crowd would be chanting "Jimmer". You know why? Cause he was sitting on the bench and they were chanting to get him in the game. The team is no different without the guy.
He asked to be cut so he could sign with another team to get more minutes so he attempt impress an NBA team to sign him to a contract next year or possibly multiple year contract Sacramento just helped him since they were not going to resign him or gives him minutes. I would have done the same if I was him.
0
Posted:
#29
Quote Originally Posted by vasilli07:
For people thinking it's a bad play, go check who the Rockets are playing tomorrow. It's Clippers, a potential look forward for them.
For people thinking it's a bad play, go check who the Rockets are playing tomorrow. It's Clippers, a potential look forward for them.
I have to agree with you, Coach Kevin McHale tends to squeeze minutes out of his players and with 3 games in 4 nights, this being the 2nd...the last two being decided by 3 points
LeagueCapper is back tonight and I'm looking forward to the UNIBROW play of the night tomorrow
0
Posted:
#32
Quote Originally Posted by DacCap3:
Loved it ,kings dominate HOU, ready to win SU pound at hoe...but this late ferdette cut is scaring me....could be more of a factor than ppl think, best 3-shooter in NBA right now, damn. still like the points though DK bout SU
Loved it ,kings dominate HOU, ready to win SU pound at hoe...but this late ferdette cut is scaring me....could be more of a factor than ppl think, best 3-shooter in NBA right now, damn. still like the points though DK bout SU
"Kings dominate Houston"? As LAGame stated the Rockets have taken 10 of the last 14 against Sac, not to mention taking 5 of 7 right in Sacramento. Based on those numbers, not sure how you can say the Kings dominate Houston. 
0
Posted:
#33
Quote Originally Posted by SeoulCapper:
I want to see more covers forum members have a commonsense of appreciating the hard work and information. When I visit LC's thread, I don't just check his picks. Rather, I am more interested in the way he formulate his selections using the existing information, the way he reaches to his conclusion, that thought process. So, in that sense, whether his picks fail or not, there's always something to learn. Look. Aporeciating his angles and following his picks are two different thing, aren't they? He asks no money, he asks no money, no compliment. Whether you tail him or not, it's you who make final decisions. So it is very immature to criticize him for failing picks. On the contrary, we need to be more appreciative of him showing how one handicapper reaches to his conclusions with data analysis. He doesn't force or beg you to tail him.
Thanks LC for your hard work.
I want to see more covers forum members have a commonsense of appreciating the hard work and information. When I visit LC's thread, I don't just check his picks. Rather, I am more interested in the way he formulate his selections using the existing information, the way he reaches to his conclusion, that thought process. So, in that sense, whether his picks fail or not, there's always something to learn. Look. Aporeciating his angles and following his picks are two different thing, aren't they? He asks no money, he asks no money, no compliment. Whether you tail him or not, it's you who make final decisions. So it is very immature to criticize him for failing picks. On the contrary, we need to be more appreciative of him showing how one handicapper reaches to his conclusions with data analysis. He doesn't force or beg you to tail him.
Thanks LC for your hard work.
Word. Thanks, LC! 
0
Posted:
#34
The problem with the Kings is that you have to trust happy and Cousins to show up and Cousins can definitely appear unmotivated at times while happy can absolutely shoot you out of a game while still scoring 20 (a horrid 6-21 vs the Warriors in a loss a few games ago).
I would see the Kings as all fat and sassy tonight after a two game winning streak vs. a Denver team that can't put a competent 5 on the floor and a Celtics team that has taken a new interest in tanking losing consecutive games to the league's dregs: the lakers and jazz albeit on the road (I.e. They haven't proven much in those wins but likely think they have).
The rockets come in right off their best quarter of the season in a gritty Come from behind win on Sunday vs the suns on the road with some nice momentum.
I expected this line to be 6 and it raised my eyebrows when it opened at 4. I root for ya for a Kings win tonight to see something I don't see at the moment to support Sacramento.
0
Posted:
#41
Quote Originally Posted by icegun98:
I never understood looking ahead angle. Wouldn't a team want to take care of buisness w a garbage team n not worry about losing 2 in a row? Take care of business n u go 1-1 worst case.
I never understood looking ahead angle. Wouldn't a team want to take care of buisness w a garbage team n not worry about losing 2 in a row? Take care of business n u go 1-1 worst case.
Like you said, garbage team. That's why teams normally don't cover when they play a team when their superstars are out. Efforts will drop as they will think it will be a scroll in the park.
0
Posted:
#42
Quote Originally Posted by SeoulCapper:
I want to see more covers forum members have a commonsense of appreciating the hard work and information. When I visit LC's thread, I don't just check his picks. Rather, I am more interested in the way he formulate his selections using the existing information, the way he reaches to his conclusion, that thought process. So, in that sense, whether his picks fail or not, there's always something to learn. Look. Aporeciating his angles and following his picks are two different thing, aren't they? He asks no money, he asks no money, no compliment. Whether you tail him or not, it's you who make final decisions. So it is very immature to criticize him for failing picks. On the contrary, we need to be more appreciative of him showing how one handicapper reaches to his conclusions with data analysis. He doesn't force or beg you to tail him.
Thanks LC for your hard work.
I want to see more covers forum members have a commonsense of appreciating the hard work and information. When I visit LC's thread, I don't just check his picks. Rather, I am more interested in the way he formulate his selections using the existing information, the way he reaches to his conclusion, that thought process. So, in that sense, whether his picks fail or not, there's always something to learn. Look. Aporeciating his angles and following his picks are two different thing, aren't they? He asks no money, he asks no money, no compliment. Whether you tail him or not, it's you who make final decisions. So it is very immature to criticize him for failing picks. On the contrary, we need to be more appreciative of him showing how one handicapper reaches to his conclusions with data analysis. He doesn't force or beg you to tail him.
Thanks LC for your hard work.
Totally with you on this.
0
Posted:
#46
LC keep doing what you are doing. I think you are on to something with the Kings tonight and I'm along for the ride with both the points and the ML. Win or lose I just wanted to extend a big thank you for the time you take in preparing your write ups. Any of these guys who expect a guarantee on anyone's play should find a new hobby. BOL.
0
Posted:
#47
Quote Originally Posted by SeoulCapper:
I want to see more covers forum members have a commonsense of appreciating the hard work and information. When I visit LC's thread, I don't just check his picks. Rather, I am more interested in the way he formulate his selections using the existing information, the way he reaches to his conclusion, that thought process. So, in that sense, whether his picks fail or not, there's always something to learn. Look. Aporeciating his angles and following his picks are two different thing, aren't they? He asks no money, he asks no money, no compliment. Whether you tail him or not, it's you who make final decisions. So it is very immature to criticize him for failing picks. On the contrary, we need to be more appreciative of him showing how one handicapper reaches to his conclusions with data analysis. He doesn't force or beg you to tail him.
Thanks LC for your hard work.
True indeed..
I want to see more covers forum members have a commonsense of appreciating the hard work and information. When I visit LC's thread, I don't just check his picks. Rather, I am more interested in the way he formulate his selections using the existing information, the way he reaches to his conclusion, that thought process. So, in that sense, whether his picks fail or not, there's always something to learn. Look. Aporeciating his angles and following his picks are two different thing, aren't they? He asks no money, he asks no money, no compliment. Whether you tail him or not, it's you who make final decisions. So it is very immature to criticize him for failing picks. On the contrary, we need to be more appreciative of him showing how one handicapper reaches to his conclusions with data analysis. He doesn't force or beg you to tail him.
Thanks LC for your hard work.
0
Hot Forum Topics
