Does this gift come with a card too? I don't think I've seen a bet look any easier all season than Dallas does tonight. This is a ridiculous line. The spread is like at least two or three points too high. The Spurs are horrible and people finally realize this now. I got a feeling the officiating is going to be so heavily slanted towards the Spurs that it will result in Mark Cuban completely flipping out afterwards and getting fined $500,000 for criticizing the stripes.
0
Does this gift come with a card too? I don't think I've seen a bet look any easier all season than Dallas does tonight. This is a ridiculous line. The spread is like at least two or three points too high. The Spurs are horrible and people finally realize this now. I got a feeling the officiating is going to be so heavily slanted towards the Spurs that it will result in Mark Cuban completely flipping out afterwards and getting fined $500,000 for criticizing the stripes.
Value for Rent the bet is not an EASY bet. Game one was -5 due to the Spurs playoff success and Dallas lack of success on the road.
I dont think you can look at a play and say it looks to easy. The thing about spreads is that they are NUMBERS. At the end of the day it is a number. Never be afraid of a number. Contrary to public belief the Oddsmakers are not sitting in a room drinking Coronas and saying okay lets trap everyone here and make Dallas +6.5 to get more action on the game-
They install a number, thats all it is a NUMBER. The number does not mean that Spurs will win or wont win or will cover or wont cover- What the spread is a number that the bookmakers feel that will get even action on a game.
There is nothing too easy in this world, TOO easy would be saying Okay Dallas is +36.5- that would be too easy- When juice is -110 both sides are equal and thus there is not one side that is easier than the other-
People pay far too much attention to NUMBERS, that is what it is a NUMBER in reality, instead of the play on the court- If the game is tight in the 4th, qtr, will that number that Vegas created of -6.5 matter to when Parker takes that jumper or Terry takes that 3 pointer?
I dont think the line could have been -3 or -4, when game 1 was -5- They lost game one so game 2 is slightly higher-- I dont think people realize the Spurs are horrible- they were 11 of 14 from 3 point range last game and still lost the game--
Concentrate on the games at hand, remember its a NUMBER, and a NUMBER should not dictate what you are thinking, you should be analyzing the game and the play on the court. What matters in the end, is is the players performance or the NUMBER that Vegas puts out?
There is no such thing as something too easy- The reason vegas wins so much is they have bettors minds clouded with Paranoi to the point where they feel things are too easy and Traps and they second guess themselves- Vegas puts out Numbers out there on games, not traps for people to fall in--
0
Value for Rent the bet is not an EASY bet. Game one was -5 due to the Spurs playoff success and Dallas lack of success on the road.
I dont think you can look at a play and say it looks to easy. The thing about spreads is that they are NUMBERS. At the end of the day it is a number. Never be afraid of a number. Contrary to public belief the Oddsmakers are not sitting in a room drinking Coronas and saying okay lets trap everyone here and make Dallas +6.5 to get more action on the game-
They install a number, thats all it is a NUMBER. The number does not mean that Spurs will win or wont win or will cover or wont cover- What the spread is a number that the bookmakers feel that will get even action on a game.
There is nothing too easy in this world, TOO easy would be saying Okay Dallas is +36.5- that would be too easy- When juice is -110 both sides are equal and thus there is not one side that is easier than the other-
People pay far too much attention to NUMBERS, that is what it is a NUMBER in reality, instead of the play on the court- If the game is tight in the 4th, qtr, will that number that Vegas created of -6.5 matter to when Parker takes that jumper or Terry takes that 3 pointer?
I dont think the line could have been -3 or -4, when game 1 was -5- They lost game one so game 2 is slightly higher-- I dont think people realize the Spurs are horrible- they were 11 of 14 from 3 point range last game and still lost the game--
Concentrate on the games at hand, remember its a NUMBER, and a NUMBER should not dictate what you are thinking, you should be analyzing the game and the play on the court. What matters in the end, is is the players performance or the NUMBER that Vegas puts out?
There is no such thing as something too easy- The reason vegas wins so much is they have bettors minds clouded with Paranoi to the point where they feel things are too easy and Traps and they second guess themselves- Vegas puts out Numbers out there on games, not traps for people to fall in--
Value for Rent the bet is not an EASY bet. Game one was -5 due to the Spurs playoff success and Dallas lack of success on the road.
I dont think you can look at a play and say it looks to easy. The thing about spreads is that they are NUMBERS. At the end of the day it is a number. Never be afraid of a number. Contrary to public belief the Oddsmakers are not sitting in a room drinking Coronas and saying okay lets trap everyone here and make Dallas +6.5 to get more action on the game-
They install a number, thats all it is a NUMBER. The number does not mean that Spurs will win or wont win or will cover or wont cover- What the spread is a number that the bookmakers feel that will get even action on a game.
There is nothing too easy in this world, TOO easy would be saying Okay Dallas is +36.5- that would be too easy- When juice is -110 both sides are equal and thus there is not one side that is easier than the other-
People pay far too much attention to NUMBERS, that is what it is a NUMBER in reality, instead of the play on the court- If the game is tight in the 4th, qtr, will that number that Vegas created of -6.5 matter to when Parker takes that jumper or Terry takes that 3 pointer?
I dont think the line could have been -3 or -4, when game 1 was -5- They lost game one so game 2 is slightly higher-- I dont think people realize the Spurs are horrible- they were 11 of 14 from 3 point range last game and still lost the game--
Concentrate on the games at hand, remember its a NUMBER, and a NUMBER should not dictate what you are thinking, you should be analyzing the game and the play on the court. What matters in the end, is is the players performance or the NUMBER that Vegas puts out?
There is no such thing as something too easy- The reason vegas wins so much is they have bettors minds clouded with Paranoi to the point where they feel things are too easy and Traps and they second guess themselves- Vegas puts out Numbers out there on games, not traps for people to fall in--
After Manu died the cat was out of the hat.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Sammy_Meatballs:
Value for Rent the bet is not an EASY bet. Game one was -5 due to the Spurs playoff success and Dallas lack of success on the road.
I dont think you can look at a play and say it looks to easy. The thing about spreads is that they are NUMBERS. At the end of the day it is a number. Never be afraid of a number. Contrary to public belief the Oddsmakers are not sitting in a room drinking Coronas and saying okay lets trap everyone here and make Dallas +6.5 to get more action on the game-
They install a number, thats all it is a NUMBER. The number does not mean that Spurs will win or wont win or will cover or wont cover- What the spread is a number that the bookmakers feel that will get even action on a game.
There is nothing too easy in this world, TOO easy would be saying Okay Dallas is +36.5- that would be too easy- When juice is -110 both sides are equal and thus there is not one side that is easier than the other-
People pay far too much attention to NUMBERS, that is what it is a NUMBER in reality, instead of the play on the court- If the game is tight in the 4th, qtr, will that number that Vegas created of -6.5 matter to when Parker takes that jumper or Terry takes that 3 pointer?
I dont think the line could have been -3 or -4, when game 1 was -5- They lost game one so game 2 is slightly higher-- I dont think people realize the Spurs are horrible- they were 11 of 14 from 3 point range last game and still lost the game--
Concentrate on the games at hand, remember its a NUMBER, and a NUMBER should not dictate what you are thinking, you should be analyzing the game and the play on the court. What matters in the end, is is the players performance or the NUMBER that Vegas puts out?
There is no such thing as something too easy- The reason vegas wins so much is they have bettors minds clouded with Paranoi to the point where they feel things are too easy and Traps and they second guess themselves- Vegas puts out Numbers out there on games, not traps for people to fall in--
hey sammymeatballs, i guess you 4got to look in the mirror b4 gametime and say " i am a winner"...... , now go find that mirror and look in it, what do you see?? i know, A LOSER !! what a joke u are ... ps keep postin so i can fade u again !!! thanks
0
hey sammymeatballs, i guess you 4got to look in the mirror b4 gametime and say " i am a winner"...... , now go find that mirror and look in it, what do you see?? i know, A LOSER !! what a joke u are ... ps keep postin so i can fade u again !!! thanks
Does this gift come with a card too? I don't think I've seen a bet look any easier all season than Dallas does tonight. This is a ridiculous line. The spread is like at least two or three points too high. The Spurs are horrible and people finally realize this now. I got a feeling the officiating is going to be so heavily slanted towards the Spurs that it will result in Mark Cuban completely flipping out afterwards and getting fined $500,000 for criticizing the stripes.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ValueforRent:
Does this gift come with a card too? I don't think I've seen a bet look any easier all season than Dallas does tonight. This is a ridiculous line. The spread is like at least two or three points too high. The Spurs are horrible and people finally realize this now. I got a feeling the officiating is going to be so heavily slanted towards the Spurs that it will result in Mark Cuban completely flipping out afterwards and getting fined $500,000 for criticizing the stripes.
i just cant stand people that post a 6-page article on here and preach how he can teach people on here new things and "tell yourself ur a winner", and whiteboards, and "think it and it will happen"and blah blah blah..... 0-1 bro on your game that you foresaw as a winner..... people are gonna rip u cause the way u carry yourself , post plays , be humble and dont think your meatballs dont stink, and go about your biz with percentages's higher than 50..... and u might get respected.... gluck in future plays....
0
i just cant stand people that post a 6-page article on here and preach how he can teach people on here new things and "tell yourself ur a winner", and whiteboards, and "think it and it will happen"and blah blah blah..... 0-1 bro on your game that you foresaw as a winner..... people are gonna rip u cause the way u carry yourself , post plays , be humble and dont think your meatballs dont stink, and go about your biz with percentages's higher than 50..... and u might get respected.... gluck in future plays....
I just want to start off with saying that I am not one of the ones bashing you. I know you probably came with good intentions and to help people out but in the end, the only thing other members care about will be your picks. The forum is definitely a tough place to earn respect and probably the only way is to be consistent. You lost your first posted pick which some how drew all this attention and it was a loser. Good luck with your next picks and I read some of your posts about confidence and being positive. I hope you stay that way and post some winners
0
I just want to start off with saying that I am not one of the ones bashing you. I know you probably came with good intentions and to help people out but in the end, the only thing other members care about will be your picks. The forum is definitely a tough place to earn respect and probably the only way is to be consistent. You lost your first posted pick which some how drew all this attention and it was a loser. Good luck with your next picks and I read some of your posts about confidence and being positive. I hope you stay that way and post some winners
Look, I know Sammy from CTG. Good guy and I think there's "some" skill there, I don't know how much. I know he did call the Ravens/Dolphins exact score and was one of the few to like the Ravens the next week as well.
However, I have rarely seen him pick a game before it's happened and he has this tendency to ramble and play both sides of the fence, as if to say "I knew it" or he thought we would forget it.
And look Sammy, you may have been drunk last night, but you said to BAR that you liked his pick of Spurs -5.5 and now you post this?
GL Sammy.
0
Look, I know Sammy from CTG. Good guy and I think there's "some" skill there, I don't know how much. I know he did call the Ravens/Dolphins exact score and was one of the few to like the Ravens the next week as well.
However, I have rarely seen him pick a game before it's happened and he has this tendency to ramble and play both sides of the fence, as if to say "I knew it" or he thought we would forget it.
And look Sammy, you may have been drunk last night, but you said to BAR that you liked his pick of Spurs -5.5 and now you post this?
Didn't you say in your other marathon thread that people think way too much and they overthink and second guess themselves out of money?
1500 words later, Dallas benched their starters in the 4th quarter because they were down 21.
VALUEFORRENT, this game was easy. Game 1 was spurs -4 and they lose, so game 2 is Spurs -6. Why would Vegas set it at 6 if the Mavs are going to win outright again? That just screams Spurs to me. Lot of public on D at +4 and even more at +6. If people had Dallas they might as well walk into the MGM and ask for $10,000, get it, and walk out. I don't think I was the only one who saw a Spurs blowout coming.
0
Didn't you say in your other marathon thread that people think way too much and they overthink and second guess themselves out of money?
1500 words later, Dallas benched their starters in the 4th quarter because they were down 21.
VALUEFORRENT, this game was easy. Game 1 was spurs -4 and they lose, so game 2 is Spurs -6. Why would Vegas set it at 6 if the Mavs are going to win outright again? That just screams Spurs to me. Lot of public on D at +4 and even more at +6. If people had Dallas they might as well walk into the MGM and ask for $10,000, get it, and walk out. I don't think I was the only one who saw a Spurs blowout coming.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Dallas Moneyline Spurs stink without Manu
sammy_myteamslosinby25_meatballs!! 
sammy 
meatballs for you!!
dallas
gluck in future plays....
Hot Forum Topics
