I never said my +300 proposal is correct. You asked what i thought was the correct odds and i thought +300. Okay so if its +600, then I'm wrong. I can admit that.
Can you admit you BET A BAD LINE?
No wonder no one likes you on this forum. You the biggest know it all poster i ever seen here at covers.
0
I never said my +300 proposal is correct. You asked what i thought was the correct odds and i thought +300. Okay so if its +600, then I'm wrong. I can admit that.
Can you admit you BET A BAD LINE?
No wonder no one likes you on this forum. You the biggest know it all poster i ever seen here at covers.
I never said my +300 proposal is correct. You asked what i thought was the correct odds and i thought +300. Okay so if its +600, then I'm wrong. I can admit that.
Can you admit you BET A BAD LINE?
No wonder no one likes you on this forum. You the biggest know it all poster i ever seen here at covers.
You come into my thread, call me out for lying, and now you know the bet I made was 100% real. Yet, you try any possible way to deflect off the fact you are wrong. Flat. Out. Wrong. This is the last post I am going to make on the subject and there is only ONE question that needs to be answered if you continue to think I lied about the +6000...
Either put up or shut up. Agree to the deal I proposed earlier and we will both send $1000 to a mod to get to the bottom of this.
Otherwise, accept the fact you were wrong on calling me out and move on. Due to the fact there isn't a chance in hell you're going to agree to my proposal, I'm done discussing this with you. Next time you call a guy out for lying, you better have facts to back it up. I called a guy out for posting a fake ticket, and clearly there was proof to back up my argument. You on the other hand, not so much.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ranger123:
I never said my +300 proposal is correct. You asked what i thought was the correct odds and i thought +300. Okay so if its +600, then I'm wrong. I can admit that.
Can you admit you BET A BAD LINE?
No wonder no one likes you on this forum. You the biggest know it all poster i ever seen here at covers.
You come into my thread, call me out for lying, and now you know the bet I made was 100% real. Yet, you try any possible way to deflect off the fact you are wrong. Flat. Out. Wrong. This is the last post I am going to make on the subject and there is only ONE question that needs to be answered if you continue to think I lied about the +6000...
Either put up or shut up. Agree to the deal I proposed earlier and we will both send $1000 to a mod to get to the bottom of this.
Otherwise, accept the fact you were wrong on calling me out and move on. Due to the fact there isn't a chance in hell you're going to agree to my proposal, I'm done discussing this with you. Next time you call a guy out for lying, you better have facts to back it up. I called a guy out for posting a fake ticket, and clearly there was proof to back up my argument. You on the other hand, not so much.
As usual, rangerz2478 is someone who thinks he can NEVER BE WRONG and can't admit it. Many posters said this as well which is why lot of people here dislike you rangerz.
And why do you take things so personally? I seen you argue with a few
other posters and the moment you and them argue, i think it was a
baseball bet on the odds for CY young for felix hernandez, you said to
the other guy lets bet $1000 on it and put your money where your mouth
is.
Why you take things so personally? I never seen a person so insecure
that they always have to prove something like you have rangerz2478.
If you want to bet $1000, go bet it at your sportsbook. Oh wait, you don't have balls to bet more than $50 a game thats why.
0
As usual, rangerz2478 is someone who thinks he can NEVER BE WRONG and can't admit it. Many posters said this as well which is why lot of people here dislike you rangerz.
And why do you take things so personally? I seen you argue with a few
other posters and the moment you and them argue, i think it was a
baseball bet on the odds for CY young for felix hernandez, you said to
the other guy lets bet $1000 on it and put your money where your mouth
is.
Why you take things so personally? I never seen a person so insecure
that they always have to prove something like you have rangerz2478.
If you want to bet $1000, go bet it at your sportsbook. Oh wait, you don't have balls to bet more than $50 a game thats why.
As usual, rangerz2478 is someone who thinks he can NEVER BE WRONG and can't admit it. Many posters said this as well which is why lot of people here dislike you rangerz.
And why do you take things so personally? I seen you argue with a few
other posters and the moment you and them argue, i think it was a
baseball bet on the odds for CY young for felix hernandez, you said to
the other guy lets bet $1000 on it and put your money where your mouth
is.
Why you take things so personally? I never seen a person so insecure
that they always have to prove something like you have rangerz2478.
If you want to bet $1000, go bet it at your sportsbook. Oh wait, you don't have balls to bet more than $50 a game thats why.
I don't think I have ever seen him post anything with regards to gambling and be wrong. IMO, he is one of the more knowledgeable cappers on this site. You are making yourself look like a fool.
Carry on
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ranger123:
As usual, rangerz2478 is someone who thinks he can NEVER BE WRONG and can't admit it. Many posters said this as well which is why lot of people here dislike you rangerz.
And why do you take things so personally? I seen you argue with a few
other posters and the moment you and them argue, i think it was a
baseball bet on the odds for CY young for felix hernandez, you said to
the other guy lets bet $1000 on it and put your money where your mouth
is.
Why you take things so personally? I never seen a person so insecure
that they always have to prove something like you have rangerz2478.
If you want to bet $1000, go bet it at your sportsbook. Oh wait, you don't have balls to bet more than $50 a game thats why.
I don't think I have ever seen him post anything with regards to gambling and be wrong. IMO, he is one of the more knowledgeable cappers on this site. You are making yourself look like a fool.
Why do u care what retard says? rangerz, we know u are right and denver had a 6point lead and the ball with 1min left, the odds was higher on betfair then what u got...
There are alot of retards on here, just laugh at them
0
Why do u care what retard says? rangerz, we know u are right and denver had a 6point lead and the ball with 1min left, the odds was higher on betfair then what u got...
There are alot of retards on here, just laugh at them
Lol but seriously it's funny this guy created the handle "Rangers123" and his first post was about me. These days I seriously take it as an honor when a guy like this creates a username just to talk shit.
Ranger123 is right on one thing though. I DO like to try and prove things when I know I'm right. Who wouldn't?
Woopdurritis "guaranteed" Felix had no chance. The only times I try and "prove" anything are when guys make completely outlandish statements that simply aren't true. It happened with Felix Hernandez, and it happened in this thread. Woopdurritis guaranteed King Felix would not win the Cy Young during the last week of the regular season last year. Not only did I say Felix would win, I said he would win in a landslide. Anyone wanna guess who won the AL Cy Young last year?
I really get a kick out of Ranger123, I really do. I have no problem admitting when I'm wrong. Hell, I make bad bets all the time and have no problem owning up to them. The thing about that is, when it comes to betting on a game by game basis, I NEVER guarantee a game, and never talk shit to someone for simply being on the other side.
I will say, that IN GENERAL Ranger123 does sound like a guy who understands probability and odds. But when it comes to late game, live betting situations, he clearly just doesn't have a clue. The mere fact he suggested +300 (even when on the spot) in the situation I presented shows he's got a lot of work to do in that field. (see posts 19 and 21 for that gem)
+300.
Anyways, enough of my rant. Thanks guys.
0
Wtf guys, everyone hates me on here remember?!?
Lol but seriously it's funny this guy created the handle "Rangers123" and his first post was about me. These days I seriously take it as an honor when a guy like this creates a username just to talk shit.
Ranger123 is right on one thing though. I DO like to try and prove things when I know I'm right. Who wouldn't?
Woopdurritis "guaranteed" Felix had no chance. The only times I try and "prove" anything are when guys make completely outlandish statements that simply aren't true. It happened with Felix Hernandez, and it happened in this thread. Woopdurritis guaranteed King Felix would not win the Cy Young during the last week of the regular season last year. Not only did I say Felix would win, I said he would win in a landslide. Anyone wanna guess who won the AL Cy Young last year?
I really get a kick out of Ranger123, I really do. I have no problem admitting when I'm wrong. Hell, I make bad bets all the time and have no problem owning up to them. The thing about that is, when it comes to betting on a game by game basis, I NEVER guarantee a game, and never talk shit to someone for simply being on the other side.
I will say, that IN GENERAL Ranger123 does sound like a guy who understands probability and odds. But when it comes to late game, live betting situations, he clearly just doesn't have a clue. The mere fact he suggested +300 (even when on the spot) in the situation I presented shows he's got a lot of work to do in that field. (see posts 19 and 21 for that gem)
Let me explain this in a way you can hopefully understand...
You thinking the +6000 should have been +1000 is just like you thinking the +1000 should have been +300. If you can't understand this then I can't help you.
You have a guy quoting a betting exchange at +9900 the time of my +6000, yet you keep pushing. Clearly I'm the one who can't admit being wrong and everyone hates me for it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ranger123:
So do you admit the line was a BAD LINE?
Let me explain this in a way you can hopefully understand...
You thinking the +6000 should have been +1000 is just like you thinking the +1000 should have been +300. If you can't understand this then I can't help you.
You have a guy quoting a betting exchange at +9900 the time of my +6000, yet you keep pushing. Clearly I'm the one who can't admit being wrong and everyone hates me for it.
Of course the +9900 odds is a bad line/incorrect line if the +6000 odds you posted at are wrong.
No way, in that situation when Portland was down 8 points with 1:45 left are true odds of +6000 on the ML. At the very most, its +2500 and that is being lenient.
Again, all i asked is, do you think the +6000 was a bad line? Yet you still refuse to answer the question. Good job dodging the question.
0
Of course the +9900 odds is a bad line/incorrect line if the +6000 odds you posted at are wrong.
No way, in that situation when Portland was down 8 points with 1:45 left are true odds of +6000 on the ML. At the very most, its +2500 and that is being lenient.
Again, all i asked is, do you think the +6000 was a bad line? Yet you still refuse to answer the question. Good job dodging the question.
Of course the +9900 odds is a bad line/incorrect line if the +6000 odds you posted at are wrong.
No way, in that situation when Portland was down 8 points with 1:45 left are true odds of +6000 on the ML. At the very most, its +2500 and that is being lenient.
Again, all i asked is, do you think the +6000 was a bad line? Yet you still refuse to answer the question. Good job dodging the question.
Dude, you made a complete fool of yourself with your +300 20 seconds left comment, and you are dead wrong on this one too. Just give it up because this is getting pathetic on your part.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ranger123:
Of course the +9900 odds is a bad line/incorrect line if the +6000 odds you posted at are wrong.
No way, in that situation when Portland was down 8 points with 1:45 left are true odds of +6000 on the ML. At the very most, its +2500 and that is being lenient.
Again, all i asked is, do you think the +6000 was a bad line? Yet you still refuse to answer the question. Good job dodging the question.
Dude, you made a complete fool of yourself with your +300 20 seconds left comment, and you are dead wrong on this one too. Just give it up because this is getting pathetic on your part.
So what do you say is the true odds of them being down 8 points with 1:45 left? You think the true odds are closer to +6000 than +2000?
Absolutely.
The funny thing about all this is that you were exposed as being COMPLETELY OFF in the 20 second situation I presented. Yet, you are sticking to your guns on this one and are completely outmatched in this debate. I gave you credit earlier too. (still not really sure why) but I did. You seem to have a basic understand of probability in relation to odds, but in LIVE BETTING LATE GAME SITUATIONS you are lost. Just. Lost.
This will be my last post in this thread and anyone viewing this thread for the first time has read what needs to be read.
Seriously Ranger123, you clearly made this username to hate on me and you have been schooled every step of the way. Jealousy is a bitch.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ranger123:
So what do you say is the true odds of them being down 8 points with 1:45 left? You think the true odds are closer to +6000 than +2000?
Absolutely.
The funny thing about all this is that you were exposed as being COMPLETELY OFF in the 20 second situation I presented. Yet, you are sticking to your guns on this one and are completely outmatched in this debate. I gave you credit earlier too. (still not really sure why) but I did. You seem to have a basic understand of probability in relation to odds, but in LIVE BETTING LATE GAME SITUATIONS you are lost. Just. Lost.
This will be my last post in this thread and anyone viewing this thread for the first time has read what needs to be read.
Seriously Ranger123, you clearly made this username to hate on me and you have been schooled every step of the way. Jealousy is a bitch.
okay so if you so smart, why don't you ever wager more than $100 on a straight wager.
You seem to love challenging people and say lets bet $1000 to prove something like you did with that baseball situation with the other guy. You got balls to make a $1000 wager at your book? Obviously not you insecure and just trying to be big against someone
0
okay so if you so smart, why don't you ever wager more than $100 on a straight wager.
You seem to love challenging people and say lets bet $1000 to prove something like you did with that baseball situation with the other guy. You got balls to make a $1000 wager at your book? Obviously not you insecure and just trying to be big against someone
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
.
Rangerz2478 is a fraud
Hot Forum Topics
