Foul, review, touch, review, foul, review, shoot, review, review, review
on the 3rd review --- It's clearly Rondo foul ! ...LOL...
![]()
on the 3rd review --- It's clearly Rondo foul ! ...LOL...
![]()
on the 3rd review --- It's clearly Rondo foul ! ...LOL...
![]()
Good call - On the Under - ![]()
Good call - On the Under - ![]()
on the 3rd review --- It's clearly Rondo foul ! ...LOL...
![]()
on the 3rd review --- It's clearly Rondo foul ! ...LOL...
![]()
One thing in mind : Zig - Zag theory in effect ?
Gm1 : Lak
Gm2 : Bos
Gm3 : Lak
Gm4 : ?? Can;t see the lines change much !! more then the Total
Maybe : BOS -2.5 190.5
One thing in mind : Zig - Zag theory in effect ?
Gm1 : Lak
Gm2 : Bos
Gm3 : Lak
Gm4 : ?? Can;t see the lines change much !! more then the Total
Maybe : BOS -2.5 190.5
Lakers have won both games that went under. To me that means we are controlling the pace.
Boston won the game that went over.
JC, your comment about the books wanting the Lakers to win tonight was right on point.
We missed that Lakers +5 2nd half play by a meaningless layup by Paul Pierce! ![]()
Thanks fellas.
![]()
Lakers have won both games that went under. To me that means we are controlling the pace.
Boston won the game that went over.
JC, your comment about the books wanting the Lakers to win tonight was right on point.
We missed that Lakers +5 2nd half play by a meaningless layup by Paul Pierce! ![]()
Thanks fellas.
![]()
In NFL , they will over turn the call(s) ... But this's NBA -it's a totally "expose" the Refs bias calls
![]()
In NFL , they will over turn the call(s) ... But this's NBA -it's a totally "expose" the Refs bias calls
![]()
Lakers have won both games that went under. To me that means we are controlling the pace.
Boston won the game that went over.
JC, your comment about the books wanting the Lakers to win tonight was right on point.
We missed that Lakers +5 2nd half play by a meaningless layup by Paul Pierce! ![]()
Thanks fellas.
![]()
His family wagered on BOS +4.5 ??? that's why
![]()
He did not want take a loss like a " woman "...![]()
Lakers have won both games that went under. To me that means we are controlling the pace.
Boston won the game that went over.
JC, your comment about the books wanting the Lakers to win tonight was right on point.
We missed that Lakers +5 2nd half play by a meaningless layup by Paul Pierce! ![]()
Thanks fellas.
![]()
His family wagered on BOS +4.5 ??? that's why
![]()
He did not want take a loss like a " woman "...![]()

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.