Hit what about teams that win as a home underdog and then are road favorites the next game? Kind of a flip of System #2.
We have that situation with the Knicks. I like OKC +2...why would the Knicks get up for this game on the road after crushing the Champions 2 days earlier?
0
Hit what about teams that win as a home underdog and then are road favorites the next game? Kind of a flip of System #2.
We have that situation with the Knicks. I like OKC +2...why would the Knicks get up for this game on the road after crushing the Champions 2 days earlier?
It works in the next game. Rest day in between is fine that what I understand. To be more accurate; it is the next game around. That is how Chicago was home favorite and lost straight up and now at home again and favor again that is why Sac is the play.
0
It works in the next game. Rest day in between is fine that what I understand. To be more accurate; it is the next game around. That is how Chicago was home favorite and lost straight up and now at home again and favor again that is why Sac is the play.
It works in the next game. Rest day in between is fine that what I understand. To be more accurate; it is the next game around. That is how Chicago was home favorite and lost straight up and now at home again and favor again that is why Sac is the play.
Thanks
0
Quote Originally Posted by swtdreammer:
It works in the next game. Rest day in between is fine that what I understand. To be more accurate; it is the next game around. That is how Chicago was home favorite and lost straight up and now at home again and favor again that is why Sac is the play.
I like SAC+8 as a road dog coming off a loss.As others pointed it out your wording of the system is misleading. In hoops BtoB means no day rest. What you should of said.I only want to clarify this very important distinction for others. The team as home favorite and lost the game straight-up ..NEXT game as home favor again ..... 85% Hasn't cover the ATS
0
Ok 1hit TakeALL
I like SAC+8 as a road dog coming off a loss.As others pointed it out your wording of the system is misleading. In hoops BtoB means no day rest. What you should of said.I only want to clarify this very important distinction for others. The team as home favorite and lost the game straight-up ..NEXT game as home favor again ..... 85% Hasn't cover the ATS
1Hit, would you have stats or bet patterns for teams that win SU as home dog, then goes on the road next game as an underdog again? A lot of weak teams' schedules fit that bill, and maybe there's some pattern there? For tomorrow, WAS falls under such a situation. Thanks if you have any input
0
1Hit, would you have stats or bet patterns for teams that win SU as home dog, then goes on the road next game as an underdog again? A lot of weak teams' schedules fit that bill, and maybe there's some pattern there? For tomorrow, WAS falls under such a situation. Thanks if you have any input
friendly advise...why dont we ask the nba players and refs instead. tomorows game who's team gonna win Ats or SU...for sure they know that....anyone here has a contact person in vegas mafia? much better
0
friendly advise...why dont we ask the nba players and refs instead. tomorows game who's team gonna win Ats or SU...for sure they know that....anyone here has a contact person in vegas mafia? much better
I like SAC+8 as a road dog coming off a loss.As others pointed it out your wording of the system is misleading. In hoops BtoB means no day rest. What you should of said.I only want to clarify this very important distinction for others. The team as home favorite and lost the game straight-up ..NEXT game as home favor again ..... 85% Hasn't cover the ATS
Thanks for your clarify .. and apologize for my english skill
0
Quote Originally Posted by chess1:
Ok 1hit TakeALL
I like SAC+8 as a road dog coming off a loss.As others pointed it out your wording of the system is misleading. In hoops BtoB means no day rest. What you should of said.I only want to clarify this very important distinction for others. The team as home favorite and lost the game straight-up ..NEXT game as home favor again ..... 85% Hasn't cover the ATS
Thanks for your clarify .. and apologize for my english skill
1Hit, would you have stats or bet patterns for teams that win SU as home dog, then goes on the road next game as an underdog again? A lot of weak teams' schedules fit that bill, and maybe there's some pattern there? For tomorrow, WAS falls under such a situation. Thanks if you have any input
Yes i do .. But in this situation wasn't smooth .. only 50% or below .. That's why i don't post .. Thanks and B.O.L
0
Quote Originally Posted by Borat38:
1Hit, would you have stats or bet patterns for teams that win SU as home dog, then goes on the road next game as an underdog again? A lot of weak teams' schedules fit that bill, and maybe there's some pattern there? For tomorrow, WAS falls under such a situation. Thanks if you have any input
Yes i do .. But in this situation wasn't smooth .. only 50% or below .. That's why i don't post .. Thanks and B.O.L
friendly advise...why dont we ask the nba players and refs instead. tomorows game who's team gonna win Ats or SU...for sure they know that....anyone here has a contact person in vegas mafia? much better
LOL, that's a good one. But you gotta know which games are fixed. I believe there's game fixing, but it's really too much to say most games are fixed. But it shouldn't be too much to believe that Tim Donaghy was the only bad apple in the NBA. I mean, if you're a referee, and you're offered, say US$50,000 or more once in a while to sway some games vs the public favorite...well, just do it ten times in a year, and you have half a million dollars of tax-free money on top of your paycheck. Whoa!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Kc_A:
friendly advise...why dont we ask the nba players and refs instead. tomorows game who's team gonna win Ats or SU...for sure they know that....anyone here has a contact person in vegas mafia? much better
LOL, that's a good one. But you gotta know which games are fixed. I believe there's game fixing, but it's really too much to say most games are fixed. But it shouldn't be too much to believe that Tim Donaghy was the only bad apple in the NBA. I mean, if you're a referee, and you're offered, say US$50,000 or more once in a while to sway some games vs the public favorite...well, just do it ten times in a year, and you have half a million dollars of tax-free money on top of your paycheck. Whoa!
friendly advise...why dont we ask the nba players and refs instead. tomorows game who's team gonna win Ats or SU...for sure they know that....anyone here has a contact person in vegas mafia? much better
.. True ... but they don't know either .. and have a order to do ...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Kc_A:
friendly advise...why dont we ask the nba players and refs instead. tomorows game who's team gonna win Ats or SU...for sure they know that....anyone here has a contact person in vegas mafia? much better
.. True ... but they don't know either .. and have a order to do ...
Yes i do .. But in this situation wasn't smooth .. only 50% or below .. That's why i don't post .. Thanks and B.O.L
1Hit, I have an idea: we can chart only the weak teams = meaning teams with a below-0.500 winning mark, because it's mostly them that get tagged with an underdog rating at home and on the road as well. It wouldn't be too hard, because around only a third of the NBA teams are currently sub-0.500....Whatcha think? I can help out: say there are 12 sub-0.500 teams; I can analyze 6, you can analyze 6, and then let's compare notes later. I feel there's a pattern in there somewhere...
0
Quote Originally Posted by 1Hit_TakeAll:
Yes i do .. But in this situation wasn't smooth .. only 50% or below .. That's why i don't post .. Thanks and B.O.L
1Hit, I have an idea: we can chart only the weak teams = meaning teams with a below-0.500 winning mark, because it's mostly them that get tagged with an underdog rating at home and on the road as well. It wouldn't be too hard, because around only a third of the NBA teams are currently sub-0.500....Whatcha think? I can help out: say there are 12 sub-0.500 teams; I can analyze 6, you can analyze 6, and then let's compare notes later. I feel there's a pattern in there somewhere...
HEY 1HIT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DAMN BRO YOU STILL AWAKE ? YOU NEED TO GET SOME . ITS NOT GOOD FOR YOU TO BE AWAKE LIKE THAT ALL THE TIME . SO ANY WAY IM LOOKING INTO THE 1ST 3 SYSTEMS IN COLLEGEBAKETBALL.. I DID FIND SOME BUT I THINK TO MANY GAMES IN 1 DAY MAKES IT HARDER. BECAUSE ITS A HIT & MISS SITUATION WITH AS MANY GAMES THEY POST A DAY BUT IM STILL WORKING ON IT GUYS. IF ANYONE ELSE WISHES TO GIVE A HAND IT WOULD BE GREAT. BUT I WONT STOP TILL I FIND SOMETHING. TY AND TODAY EVERYONE. LETS MAKE THAT
0
HEY 1HIT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DAMN BRO YOU STILL AWAKE ? YOU NEED TO GET SOME . ITS NOT GOOD FOR YOU TO BE AWAKE LIKE THAT ALL THE TIME . SO ANY WAY IM LOOKING INTO THE 1ST 3 SYSTEMS IN COLLEGEBAKETBALL.. I DID FIND SOME BUT I THINK TO MANY GAMES IN 1 DAY MAKES IT HARDER. BECAUSE ITS A HIT & MISS SITUATION WITH AS MANY GAMES THEY POST A DAY BUT IM STILL WORKING ON IT GUYS. IF ANYONE ELSE WISHES TO GIVE A HAND IT WOULD BE GREAT. BUT I WONT STOP TILL I FIND SOMETHING. TY AND TODAY EVERYONE. LETS MAKE THAT
1Hit, I have an idea: we can chart only the weak teams = meaning teams with a below-0.500 winning mark, because it's mostly them that get tagged with an underdog rating at home and on the road as well. It wouldn't be too hard, because around only a third of the NBA teams are currently sub-0.500....Whatcha think? I can help out: say there are 12 sub-0.500 teams; I can analyze 6, you can analyze 6, and then let's compare notes later. I feel there's a pattern in there somewhere... YOU MIGHT HAVE SOMETHING BORAT
0
Quote Originally Posted by Borat38:
1Hit, I have an idea: we can chart only the weak teams = meaning teams with a below-0.500 winning mark, because it's mostly them that get tagged with an underdog rating at home and on the road as well. It wouldn't be too hard, because around only a third of the NBA teams are currently sub-0.500....Whatcha think? I can help out: say there are 12 sub-0.500 teams; I can analyze 6, you can analyze 6, and then let's compare notes later. I feel there's a pattern in there somewhere... YOU MIGHT HAVE SOMETHING BORAT
But in NOV. 14 only 1 BOS drooping in the system # 3 or more than that
Hi 1hit
I have checked already, Last Nov 14, there were actually 5 roaddog teams won straightup and 5 home favorite teams lost straight up.
After I checked all these teams' succeeding games, there were 2 teams Phi and Den fell into system#2,
Nov. 14 Phi +1 vs Ind won straight up as RoadDog Final score 94-92 Nov. 15 OKC vs Phi -10.5COVERs as home favorite Final score 85-110
Nov. 14 Den + 10 vs Bos won straight up as RoadDog Final score 94-85 Nov. 16 Min vs Den -9.5Didn't COVER as home favorite Final score 84-90
So Phi covers and Den didn't cover.
While there were also 2 teams Bos and Dal that fitted into system#3 after their Nov. 14 games
Nov. 14 Den vs Bos -10 lost straight up as Home Fav Final score
94-85
Nov. 15 Bos -9 vs Mil Didn't COVER as Road Fav Final score 102-97
Nov. 14 Orl vs Dal -1.5 lost straight up as Home Fav Final score 102-100
Nov. 16 Dal -1.5 vs Nyk COVERS as Road Fav Final score 124-114
Ended up Dal covers and Bos didn't cover
So all in all after november 14, there were 2 system#2 plays and 2 system#3 plays.....does it mean they are already multiple plays and we should avoid these games if these situation happened?
0
Quote Originally Posted by 1Hit_TakeAll:
But in NOV. 14 only 1 BOS drooping in the system # 3 or more than that
Hi 1hit
I have checked already, Last Nov 14, there were actually 5 roaddog teams won straightup and 5 home favorite teams lost straight up.
After I checked all these teams' succeeding games, there were 2 teams Phi and Den fell into system#2,
Nov. 14 Phi +1 vs Ind won straight up as RoadDog Final score 94-92 Nov. 15 OKC vs Phi -10.5COVERs as home favorite Final score 85-110
Nov. 14 Den + 10 vs Bos won straight up as RoadDog Final score 94-85 Nov. 16 Min vs Den -9.5Didn't COVER as home favorite Final score 84-90
So Phi covers and Den didn't cover.
While there were also 2 teams Bos and Dal that fitted into system#3 after their Nov. 14 games
Nov. 14 Den vs Bos -10 lost straight up as Home Fav Final score
94-85
Nov. 15 Bos -9 vs Mil Didn't COVER as Road Fav Final score 102-97
Nov. 14 Orl vs Dal -1.5 lost straight up as Home Fav Final score 102-100
Nov. 16 Dal -1.5 vs Nyk COVERS as Road Fav Final score 124-114
Ended up Dal covers and Bos didn't cover
So all in all after november 14, there were 2 system#2 plays and 2 system#3 plays.....does it mean they are already multiple plays and we should avoid these games if these situation happened?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.