DIDN'T YOU SAY SOMETHING BEFORE ABOUT IF THERE IS MORE THAN 1 GAME THAT FITS INTO A SYSTEM TO STAY AWAY FROM IT, OR SOMETHING?????? SEVERAL SCENARIOS FOR THAT TONIGHT, WHAT YOU THINK?????????
0
Quote Originally Posted by 1Hit_TakeAll:
Thanks .. and B.O.L to us
DIDN'T YOU SAY SOMETHING BEFORE ABOUT IF THERE IS MORE THAN 1 GAME THAT FITS INTO A SYSTEM TO STAY AWAY FROM IT, OR SOMETHING?????? SEVERAL SCENARIOS FOR THAT TONIGHT, WHAT YOU THINK?????????
Jplayer, Please look at the game again be4 correcting otherwise you might confuse other. California did fall into system 3 because Washington was previously a Home Fav and lost straight up then he was a home fav again last night so you should play AGAINST Wash. Keep in mind 1Hit already rephrased his rules for the system which is the next game in place and does NOT need to be a b2b like the next consecutive day.
He also mentioned that if multiple games fit into ONE of system like today we have Charlotte and Atlanta both fit into system #2; these plays or the system should be VOID and your own research kick in or mind as well pick the opposite. We have to wait for him to filter out the ones those might fall into 15% loss due to this multiples game.
0
Jplayer, Please look at the game again be4 correcting otherwise you might confuse other. California did fall into system 3 because Washington was previously a Home Fav and lost straight up then he was a home fav again last night so you should play AGAINST Wash. Keep in mind 1Hit already rephrased his rules for the system which is the next game in place and does NOT need to be a b2b like the next consecutive day.
He also mentioned that if multiple games fit into ONE of system like today we have Charlotte and Atlanta both fit into system #2; these plays or the system should be VOID and your own research kick in or mind as well pick the opposite. We have to wait for him to filter out the ones those might fall into 15% loss due to this multiples game.
Jplayer, Please look at the game again be4 correcting otherwise you might confuse other. California did fall into system 3 because Washington was previously a Home Fav and lost straight up then he was a home fav again last night so you should play AGAINST Wash. Keep in mind 1Hit already rephrased his rules for the system which is the next game in place and does NOT need to be a b2b like the next consecutive day.
He also mentioned that if multiple games fit into ONE of system like today we have Charlotte and Atlanta both fit into system #2; these plays or the system should be VOID and your own research kick in or mind as well pick the opposite. We have to wait for him to filter out the ones those might fall into 15% loss due to this multiples game.
0
Quote Originally Posted by swtdreammer:
Jplayer, Please look at the game again be4 correcting otherwise you might confuse other. California did fall into system 3 because Washington was previously a Home Fav and lost straight up then he was a home fav again last night so you should play AGAINST Wash. Keep in mind 1Hit already rephrased his rules for the system which is the next game in place and does NOT need to be a b2b like the next consecutive day.
He also mentioned that if multiple games fit into ONE of system like today we have Charlotte and Atlanta both fit into system #2; these plays or the system should be VOID and your own research kick in or mind as well pick the opposite. We have to wait for him to filter out the ones those might fall into 15% loss due to this multiples game.
Jplayer, Please look at the game again be4 correcting otherwise you might confuse other. California did fall into system 3 because Washington was previously a Home Fav and lost straight up then he was a home fav again last night so you should play AGAINST Wash. Keep in mind 1Hit already rephrased his rules for the system which is the next game in place and does NOT need to be a b2b like the next consecutive day.
He also mentioned that if multiple games fit into ONE of system like today we have Charlotte and Atlanta both fit into system #2; these plays or the system should be VOID and your own research kick in or mind as well pick the opposite. We have to wait for him to filter out the ones those might fall into 15% loss due to this multiples game.
swtdreamer, I know you know the systems, but I believe you're first mention of the Cal play is what threw me off. you said it fell in system 3 which is:
System 3:
The team as a Home favorite and Lost the game straight-up in thier previous home game ... Then Going on the road and as a Road favorite ..... Most most of the time They will COVERS THE ATS .. and could say 85% of that
so when looking at the game I looked at system 3 which that play did not fall into.
I think you meant to say that the Cal pick fell into system #1
System 1:
The team as home favorite and lost the game straight-up ... Back to back as home favor again ..... 85% Hasn't cover the ATS
0
Quote Originally Posted by swtdreammer:
Jplayer, Please look at the game again be4 correcting otherwise you might confuse other. California did fall into system 3 because Washington was previously a Home Fav and lost straight up then he was a home fav again last night so you should play AGAINST Wash. Keep in mind 1Hit already rephrased his rules for the system which is the next game in place and does NOT need to be a b2b like the next consecutive day.
He also mentioned that if multiple games fit into ONE of system like today we have Charlotte and Atlanta both fit into system #2; these plays or the system should be VOID and your own research kick in or mind as well pick the opposite. We have to wait for him to filter out the ones those might fall into 15% loss due to this multiples game.
swtdreamer, I know you know the systems, but I believe you're first mention of the Cal play is what threw me off. you said it fell in system 3 which is:
System 3:
The team as a Home favorite and Lost the game straight-up in thier previous home game ... Then Going on the road and as a Road favorite ..... Most most of the time They will COVERS THE ATS .. and could say 85% of that
so when looking at the game I looked at system 3 which that play did not fall into.
I think you meant to say that the Cal pick fell into system #1
System 1:
The team as home favorite and lost the game straight-up ... Back to back as home favor again ..... 85% Hasn't cover the ATS
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
