-5.5 +9 -1.5 NON FAV +12
-5.5 +8 -2.5 NON FAV +6
-5.5 +8 -2 FAV +7
-5.5 +6 -2 NON FAV +2OT
-5.5 +6 -1.5 NON FAV +2
THIS IS WHAT I HAVE TIN...BUT..IT IS DUKE
-5.5 +9 -1.5 NON FAV +12
-5.5 +8 -2.5 NON FAV +6
-5.5 +8 -2 FAV +7
-5.5 +6 -2 NON FAV +2OT
-5.5 +6 -1.5 NON FAV +2
THIS IS WHAT I HAVE TIN...BUT..IT IS DUKE
-5.5 +9 -1.5 NON FAV +12
-5.5 +8 -2.5 NON FAV +6
-5.5 +8 -2 FAV +7
-5.5 +6 -2 NON FAV +2OT
-5.5 +6 -1.5 NON FAV +2
THIS IS WHAT I HAVE TIN...BUT..IT IS DUKE
-5.5 +9 -1.5 NON FAV +12
-5.5 +8 -2.5 NON FAV +6
-5.5 +8 -2 FAV +7
-5.5 +6 -2 NON FAV +2OT
-5.5 +6 -1.5 NON FAV +2
THIS IS WHAT I HAVE TIN...BUT..IT IS DUKE
-5.5 +9 -1.5 NON FAV +12
-5.5 +8 -2.5 NON FAV +6
-5.5 +8 -2 FAV +7
-5.5 +6 -2 NON FAV +2OT
-5.5 +6 -1.5 NON FAV +2
THIS IS WHAT I HAVE TIN...BUT..IT IS DUKE
Rob,
I was down there for a month watching Carlos Hyde of Naples High make boys look like children 2+ years ago. Man was he good.
Another Taurean Charles??
Could of started at the "U"
Is he a bust or what????
Rob,
I was down there for a month watching Carlos Hyde of Naples High make boys look like children 2+ years ago. Man was he good.
Another Taurean Charles??
Could of started at the "U"
Is he a bust or what????
Yes , I do - but not EVERY GAMES on the board - I"m ONLY capping the games I'm gonna to play in the 2nd Half !
for this game - If Lakers win by 2 ( and they do : 51-49 ) .I expect or you call estimate "
Lakers - 6.5 and 102
But, the lines from books are -4.5 and 5 at 103 103.5
So the plays are : CHI +5 and UNDER 103.5
Yes , I do - but not EVERY GAMES on the board - I"m ONLY capping the games I'm gonna to play in the 2nd Half !
for this game - If Lakers win by 2 ( and they do : 51-49 ) .I expect or you call estimate "
Lakers - 6.5 and 102
But, the lines from books are -4.5 and 5 at 103 103.5
So the plays are : CHI +5 and UNDER 103.5
Yes , I do - but not EVERY GAMES on the board - I"m ONLY capping the games I'm gonna to play in the 2nd Half !
for this game - If Lakers win by 2 ( and they do : 51-49 ) .I expect or you call estimate "
Lakers - 6.5 and 102
But, the lines from books are -4.5 and 5 at 103 103.5
So the plays are : CHI +5 and UNDER 103.5
So you are saying there should be a play, just because you think the number is off by 1.5 points ?
Yes , I do - but not EVERY GAMES on the board - I"m ONLY capping the games I'm gonna to play in the 2nd Half !
for this game - If Lakers win by 2 ( and they do : 51-49 ) .I expect or you call estimate "
Lakers - 6.5 and 102
But, the lines from books are -4.5 and 5 at 103 103.5
So the plays are : CHI +5 and UNDER 103.5
So you are saying there should be a play, just because you think the number is off by 1.5 points ?
Yes , I do - but not EVERY GAMES on the board - I"m ONLY capping the games I'm gonna to play in the 2nd Half !
for this game - If Lakers win by 2 ( and they do : 51-49 ) .I expect or you call estimate "
Lakers - 6.5 and 102
But, the lines from books are -4.5 and 5 at 103 103.5
So the plays are : CHI +5 and UNDER 103.5
Yes , I do - but not EVERY GAMES on the board - I"m ONLY capping the games I'm gonna to play in the 2nd Half !
for this game - If Lakers win by 2 ( and they do : 51-49 ) .I expect or you call estimate "
Lakers - 6.5 and 102
But, the lines from books are -4.5 and 5 at 103 103.5
So the plays are : CHI +5 and UNDER 103.5
DET @ DAL - will be between 93 - 94.5 ( will no HIGHER then 94.5 )
CHI @ LAK - will be between 100- 101.5 ( will no HIGHER then 102 )
Damn JCTS nice guess..
DET @ DAL - will be between 93 - 94.5 ( will no HIGHER then 94.5 )
CHI @ LAK - will be between 100- 101.5 ( will no HIGHER then 102 )
Damn JCTS nice guess..
Yes , I do - but not EVERY GAMES on the board - I"m ONLY capping the games I'm gonna to play in the 2nd Half !
for this game - If Lakers win by 2 ( and they do : 51-49 ) .I expect or you call estimate "
Lakers - 6.5 and 102
But, the lines from books are -4.5 and 5 at 103 103.5
So the plays are : CHI +5 and UNDER 103.5
BUT THIS ONLY GETS YOU BACK TO THE ORIGINAL WHOLE GAME SPREAD....THEREFORE..IT IS USELESS...BECASUE THE WHOLE GAME SPREAD COULD BE OFF 20 POINTS OR MORE....
Yes , I do - but not EVERY GAMES on the board - I"m ONLY capping the games I'm gonna to play in the 2nd Half !
for this game - If Lakers win by 2 ( and they do : 51-49 ) .I expect or you call estimate "
Lakers - 6.5 and 102
But, the lines from books are -4.5 and 5 at 103 103.5
So the plays are : CHI +5 and UNDER 103.5
BUT THIS ONLY GETS YOU BACK TO THE ORIGINAL WHOLE GAME SPREAD....THEREFORE..IT IS USELESS...BECASUE THE WHOLE GAME SPREAD COULD BE OFF 20 POINTS OR MORE....
Yes , I do - but not EVERY GAMES on the board - I"m ONLY capping the games I'm gonna to play in the 2nd Half !
for this game - If Lakers win by 2 ( and they do : 51-49 ) .I expect or you call estimate "
Lakers - 6.5 and 102
But, the lines from books are -4.5 and 5 at 103 103.5
So the plays are : CHI +5 and UNDER 103.5
And something else.
You said the estimate was Lakers -6.5 and they were only -5 and it moved to -4.5. Wouldn't you take the Lakers because you were getting two points of "value" You are only laying -4.5 instead of your expectation of -6.5 ?
Just wondering on the thought process here.
Yes , I do - but not EVERY GAMES on the board - I"m ONLY capping the games I'm gonna to play in the 2nd Half !
for this game - If Lakers win by 2 ( and they do : 51-49 ) .I expect or you call estimate "
Lakers - 6.5 and 102
But, the lines from books are -4.5 and 5 at 103 103.5
So the plays are : CHI +5 and UNDER 103.5
And something else.
You said the estimate was Lakers -6.5 and they were only -5 and it moved to -4.5. Wouldn't you take the Lakers because you were getting two points of "value" You are only laying -4.5 instead of your expectation of -6.5 ?
Just wondering on the thought process here.
Rob,
I was down there for a month watching Carlos Hyde of Naples High make boys look like children 2+ years ago. Man was he good.
Another Taurean Charles??
Could of started at the "U"
Is he a bust or what????
WE HAVE MANY MANY GREATS COME OUT OF NAPLES....EDGERRIN JAMES AND JAVARIS JAMES TO NAME A FEW....BUT EVERY YEAR WE HAVE AT LEAST 50 OR SO KIDS FROM THE NAPLES AREA GO TO A D1 PROGRAM....
MY WIFE IS AN ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL AT LELY HIGH....THAT IS WHERE THE OCTAVIAN KID CAME FROM THAT PLAYED FOR DALLAS AND KEITH ELOY....THE KID THAT JUMPED OUT OF THE POOL AND INTO THE BACK OF THE FORD TRUCK WITH FLIPFLOPS ON....PLAYS FOR WASHINGTON - OR DID.....
ANYWAY...YEAH..PROBABLY A BUST...BUT THE BIGGEST BUST WAS THE KID THAT WENT TO CLEMSON...ILL REMEMBER HIS NAME IN A MINUTE...ALL THE TALENT IN THE WORLD AND COULDNT GET IT TOGETHER...(DWANE COLEMAN) - REMEMBER HIM?
BTW - NAPLES PLAYS SOUTH FT MYERS TO GO TO THE STATE CHAMPIONSHIP (AGAIN) FRIDAY NIGHT
Rob,
I was down there for a month watching Carlos Hyde of Naples High make boys look like children 2+ years ago. Man was he good.
Another Taurean Charles??
Could of started at the "U"
Is he a bust or what????
WE HAVE MANY MANY GREATS COME OUT OF NAPLES....EDGERRIN JAMES AND JAVARIS JAMES TO NAME A FEW....BUT EVERY YEAR WE HAVE AT LEAST 50 OR SO KIDS FROM THE NAPLES AREA GO TO A D1 PROGRAM....
MY WIFE IS AN ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL AT LELY HIGH....THAT IS WHERE THE OCTAVIAN KID CAME FROM THAT PLAYED FOR DALLAS AND KEITH ELOY....THE KID THAT JUMPED OUT OF THE POOL AND INTO THE BACK OF THE FORD TRUCK WITH FLIPFLOPS ON....PLAYS FOR WASHINGTON - OR DID.....
ANYWAY...YEAH..PROBABLY A BUST...BUT THE BIGGEST BUST WAS THE KID THAT WENT TO CLEMSON...ILL REMEMBER HIS NAME IN A MINUTE...ALL THE TALENT IN THE WORLD AND COULDNT GET IT TOGETHER...(DWANE COLEMAN) - REMEMBER HIM?
BTW - NAPLES PLAYS SOUTH FT MYERS TO GO TO THE STATE CHAMPIONSHIP (AGAIN) FRIDAY NIGHT
And something else.
You said the estimate was Lakers -6.5 and they were only -5 and it moved to -4.5. Wouldn't you take the Lakers because you were getting two points of "value" You are only laying -4.5 instead of your expectation of -6.5 ?
Just wondering on the thought process here.
AND SOMETHING ELSE TO THINK ABOUT - YOU ARE BASING EVERYTHING OFF OF THE FACT THAT -8 IS GOOD..WHAT IF THE LAKERS WIN BY 30 HERE?.....THAT WOULD MEAN THAT YOUR "GUESSTIMATED" BASED ON A NUMBER THAT WAS FLAWED BY 22 POINTS!
And something else.
You said the estimate was Lakers -6.5 and they were only -5 and it moved to -4.5. Wouldn't you take the Lakers because you were getting two points of "value" You are only laying -4.5 instead of your expectation of -6.5 ?
Just wondering on the thought process here.
AND SOMETHING ELSE TO THINK ABOUT - YOU ARE BASING EVERYTHING OFF OF THE FACT THAT -8 IS GOOD..WHAT IF THE LAKERS WIN BY 30 HERE?.....THAT WOULD MEAN THAT YOUR "GUESSTIMATED" BASED ON A NUMBER THAT WAS FLAWED BY 22 POINTS!
VERY KIND OF YOU....I LOVE SITTING HERE WITH MY FRIENDS AND "FUCKING THE BOOKS" .....HAHA..AS ENJOY WOULD SAY.....
THERE IS ONLY LIKE 2 OTHER THINGS IN THE WORLD ID RATHER DO...HAHA
VERY KIND OF YOU....I LOVE SITTING HERE WITH MY FRIENDS AND "FUCKING THE BOOKS" .....HAHA..AS ENJOY WOULD SAY.....
THERE IS ONLY LIKE 2 OTHER THINGS IN THE WORLD ID RATHER DO...HAHA
So you are saying there should be a play, just because you think the number is off by 1.5 points ?
Yes -
1) If you ALREADY wagered on Lakers -8 or 8.5 ( FG ) -You will a) pass or b) jump on Lakers -5
2) If you Already wagered on CHI +8 or +8.5 ( FG ) - You jump on CHI +5 - Thinking/believing Lakers CAN'T cover the Original Spread .
in this game - I wagered on Lakers -8 FG and UNDER 204 - so I plays : CHI + UNDER for 2nd half .
If Lakers Fav by -6 or -6.5 ...I will play Lakers
So you are saying there should be a play, just because you think the number is off by 1.5 points ?
Yes -
1) If you ALREADY wagered on Lakers -8 or 8.5 ( FG ) -You will a) pass or b) jump on Lakers -5
2) If you Already wagered on CHI +8 or +8.5 ( FG ) - You jump on CHI +5 - Thinking/believing Lakers CAN'T cover the Original Spread .
in this game - I wagered on Lakers -8 FG and UNDER 204 - so I plays : CHI + UNDER for 2nd half .
If Lakers Fav by -6 or -6.5 ...I will play Lakers
Yes -
1) If you ALREADY wagered on Lakers -8 or 8.5 ( FG ) -You will a) pass or b) jump on Lakers -5
2) If you Already wagered on CHI +8 or +8.5 ( FG ) - You jump on CHI +5 - Thinking/believing Lakers CAN'T cover the Original Spread .
in this game - I wagered on Lakers -8 FG and UNDER 204 - so I plays : CHI + UNDER for 2nd half .
If Lakers Fav by -6 or -6.5 ...I will play Lakers
Yes -
1) If you ALREADY wagered on Lakers -8 or 8.5 ( FG ) -You will a) pass or b) jump on Lakers -5
2) If you Already wagered on CHI +8 or +8.5 ( FG ) - You jump on CHI +5 - Thinking/believing Lakers CAN'T cover the Original Spread .
in this game - I wagered on Lakers -8 FG and UNDER 204 - so I plays : CHI + UNDER for 2nd half .
If Lakers Fav by -6 or -6.5 ...I will play Lakers
BUT THIS ONLY GETS YOU BACK TO THE ORIGINAL WHOLE GAME SPREAD....THEREFORE..IT IS USELESS...BECASUE THE WHOLE GAME SPREAD COULD BE OFF 20 POINTS OR MORE....
Then you have a choice : Side or Total
BUT THIS ONLY GETS YOU BACK TO THE ORIGINAL WHOLE GAME SPREAD....THEREFORE..IT IS USELESS...BECASUE THE WHOLE GAME SPREAD COULD BE OFF 20 POINTS OR MORE....
Then you have a choice : Side or Total
So you are saying there should be a play, just because you think the number is off by 1.5 points ?
So you are saying there should be a play, just because you think the number is off by 1.5 points ?
Yes -
1) If you ALREADY wagered on Lakers -8 or 8.5 ( FG ) -You will a) pass or b) jump on Lakers -5
2) If you Already wagered on CHI +8 or +8.5 ( FG ) - You jump on CHI +5 - Thinking/believing Lakers CAN'T cover the Original Spread .
in this game - I wagered on Lakers -8 FG and UNDER 204 - so I plays : CHI + UNDER for 2nd half .
If Lakers Fav by -6 or -6.5 ...I will play Lakers
Yes -
1) If you ALREADY wagered on Lakers -8 or 8.5 ( FG ) -You will a) pass or b) jump on Lakers -5
2) If you Already wagered on CHI +8 or +8.5 ( FG ) - You jump on CHI +5 - Thinking/believing Lakers CAN'T cover the Original Spread .
in this game - I wagered on Lakers -8 FG and UNDER 204 - so I plays : CHI + UNDER for 2nd half .
If Lakers Fav by -6 or -6.5 ...I will play Lakers
Books said : Lakers can't COVERED ( original spread -8 )
I may be wrong here ( Rob pick Lakers -5 ) - Just explain my ways of capping the 2nd Half lines/ totals
Books said : Lakers can't COVERED ( original spread -8 )
I may be wrong here ( Rob pick Lakers -5 ) - Just explain my ways of capping the 2nd Half lines/ totals
Then you have a choice : Side or Total
YEAH..I UNDERSTAND IT...BUT I ONLY PLAY SPREADS...BUT I INVITE YOUR INSIGHT - LIKE NOW....I SURE DON'T LIKE YOU HAVING THE BULLS WITH 5 POINTS...HAHA...
HEY...WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER..TO WIN....AND IF YOU AHVE IDEAS...OR SEE SOMETHING I DONT...BY ALL MEANS!....I JUST WANNA WIN $$$$...I HAVE NO EGO......!!!
Then you have a choice : Side or Total
YEAH..I UNDERSTAND IT...BUT I ONLY PLAY SPREADS...BUT I INVITE YOUR INSIGHT - LIKE NOW....I SURE DON'T LIKE YOU HAVING THE BULLS WITH 5 POINTS...HAHA...
HEY...WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER..TO WIN....AND IF YOU AHVE IDEAS...OR SEE SOMETHING I DONT...BY ALL MEANS!....I JUST WANNA WIN $$$$...I HAVE NO EGO......!!!

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.