& noticed you've been following me in the PO's for some time now. You must have been a rich man the past 3 seasons. Let's hope my instincts are in tact this year
not rich but just enough
good luck
pakalolo sweet
0
Quote Originally Posted by 3BallBomber:
i was just reading through my 2014 playoff threads:
& noticed you've been following me in the PO's for some time now. You must have been a rich man the past 3 seasons. Let's hope my instincts are in tact this year
Have you ever considered the fact that it's not fixed? lol. Seems pretty stupid to be betting on a sport that you think is fixed, unless you have inside info. Something tells me you don't really think it's fixed though. Just makes for a nice story when you lose.
0
Have you ever considered the fact that it's not fixed? lol. Seems pretty stupid to be betting on a sport that you think is fixed, unless you have inside info. Something tells me you don't really think it's fixed though. Just makes for a nice story when you lose.
Have you ever considered the fact that it's not fixed? lol. Seems pretty stupid to be betting on a sport that you think is fixed, unless you have inside info. Something tells me you don't really think it's fixed though. Just makes for a nice story when you lose.
Its not stupid when you consistently win money. Numbers don't lie
0
Quote Originally Posted by simple3:
Have you ever considered the fact that it's not fixed? lol. Seems pretty stupid to be betting on a sport that you think is fixed, unless you have inside info. Something tells me you don't really think it's fixed though. Just makes for a nice story when you lose.
Its not stupid when you consistently win money. Numbers don't lie
Its not stupid when you consistently win money. Numbers don't lie
Think about it. You think a result is predetermined or at least heavily influenced by the powers that be. You don't actually have the inside word as to what it is but you bet anyway. Basically that would be like betting on WWE which I'm sure you don't do. He might consistently win but that's probably more to do with his basketball knowledge rather than the crazy fixing side stories to go with it.
I mean you can't do a big write up about how this is all set up for the heat to win and then come back and say oh actually it might fixed for the Hornets to win lol. It's just a good basketball series...as he said originally if this sh*t was fixed then Miami would be a shoe in(superstar in DWade, much bigger market etc)
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ultimate5:
Its not stupid when you consistently win money. Numbers don't lie
Think about it. You think a result is predetermined or at least heavily influenced by the powers that be. You don't actually have the inside word as to what it is but you bet anyway. Basically that would be like betting on WWE which I'm sure you don't do. He might consistently win but that's probably more to do with his basketball knowledge rather than the crazy fixing side stories to go with it.
I mean you can't do a big write up about how this is all set up for the heat to win and then come back and say oh actually it might fixed for the Hornets to win lol. It's just a good basketball series...as he said originally if this sh*t was fixed then Miami would be a shoe in(superstar in DWade, much bigger market etc)
Think about it. You think a result is predetermined or at least heavily influenced by the powers that be. You don't actually have the inside word as to what it is but you bet anyway. Basically that would be like betting on WWE which I'm sure you don't do. He might consistently win but that's probably more to do with his basketball knowledge rather than the crazy fixing side stories to go with it.
I mean you can't do a big write up about how this is all set up for the heat to win and then come back and say oh actually it might fixed for the Hornets to win lol. It's just a good basketball series...as he said originally if this sh*t was fixed then Miami would be a shoe in(superstar in DWade, much bigger market etc)
I totally understand what your saying.
I will link my last 3 coves playoffs thread when i can. If you have time read through them. And you may even question everything you believe. I'm not merely predicting who i think the league wants to advance i've predicted who they will send to ref, one time for an entire NBA finals. I've predicted how many games a series goes and predicted all ECF/WCF & NBA Winners. All while hitting a ridiculous % clip. no it's not all predicated on corruption angle, you must also have basketball knowledge but that can only get you so far. I put everything together and hit plays that's been successfull.
The numbers speak for themselves and that's for the past 3 playoffs now and counting.
I shouldn't really need to elaborate because my threads/record speaks for themselves.
0
Quote Originally Posted by simple3:
Think about it. You think a result is predetermined or at least heavily influenced by the powers that be. You don't actually have the inside word as to what it is but you bet anyway. Basically that would be like betting on WWE which I'm sure you don't do. He might consistently win but that's probably more to do with his basketball knowledge rather than the crazy fixing side stories to go with it.
I mean you can't do a big write up about how this is all set up for the heat to win and then come back and say oh actually it might fixed for the Hornets to win lol. It's just a good basketball series...as he said originally if this sh*t was fixed then Miami would be a shoe in(superstar in DWade, much bigger market etc)
I totally understand what your saying.
I will link my last 3 coves playoffs thread when i can. If you have time read through them. And you may even question everything you believe. I'm not merely predicting who i think the league wants to advance i've predicted who they will send to ref, one time for an entire NBA finals. I've predicted how many games a series goes and predicted all ECF/WCF & NBA Winners. All while hitting a ridiculous % clip. no it's not all predicated on corruption angle, you must also have basketball knowledge but that can only get you so far. I put everything together and hit plays that's been successfull.
The numbers speak for themselves and that's for the past 3 playoffs now and counting.
I shouldn't really need to elaborate because my threads/record speaks for themselves.
If indeed the Spurs are supposed to advance then they take g1. Covering is another issue but i feel in order to not risk them losing the game they should also have a reasonable enough lead to not risk a loss.
0
Play:
SAS -6.5
If indeed the Spurs are supposed to advance then they take g1. Covering is another issue but i feel in order to not risk them losing the game they should also have a reasonable enough lead to not risk a loss.
Was all this hoopla about the horrendous officiating in this series just a way to fabricate drama by sending it to a game 7 for revenues? We won't know until the end of this game but I'm sticking to my predictions that Miami will face Lebron & the Cavs in the ECF. So i may likely be going w/ Miami all the way - do it die w/ the Heat? I'm going to have to check ref assignment first this time & see what i decide later.
0
Leaning:
MIA -6.5 UNDER 191
Was all this hoopla about the horrendous officiating in this series just a way to fabricate drama by sending it to a game 7 for revenues? We won't know until the end of this game but I'm sticking to my predictions that Miami will face Lebron & the Cavs in the ECF. So i may likely be going w/ Miami all the way - do it die w/ the Heat? I'm going to have to check ref assignment first this time & see what i decide later.
If indeed the Spurs are supposed to advance then they take g1. Covering is another issue but i feel in order to not risk them losing the game they should also have a reasonable enough lead to not risk a loss.
Good call
0
Quote Originally Posted by 3BallBomber:
Play:
SAS -6.5
If indeed the Spurs are supposed to advance then they take g1. Covering is another issue but i feel in order to not risk them losing the game they should also have a reasonable enough lead to not risk a loss.