All Forums | Music

you need this...

Participants:
Search
Views: 463
Posts: 17
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 3713
Posted: #1
1st up, "Mr excitement", this

and to bring you back down to earth , the Beatles with the swing they wish they were capable of... ENJOY
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 38241
Posted: #2
Good stuff.............something doesn't seem right with the remix though.......that beat makes the lyrics lose its feeling imo.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 10502
Posted: #3
The Beatles are great.  Why fuck it up with that?  Why not just put chocolate syrup on your pizza while your at it... 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 1784
Posted: #4
I didn't realize Jackie Wilson was so great, even live. Wow. Sweet red, pirate jumpsuit, What were people thinking back then? Great, great vocals, though.
The Beatles mixed with Motown seems to be a good idea but that song sort of sucked. 
This one is a bit better. Mashups are pretty fucking cool if they're done well. 

next one is NIN and Beatles


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 3713
Posted: #5
Quote Originally Posted by Sugarhouse:

I didn't realize Jackie Wilson was so great, even live. Wow. Sweet red, pirate jumpsuit, What were people thinking back then? Great, great vocals, though.
The Beatles mixed with Motown seems to be a good idea but that song sort of sucked. 
This one is a bit better. Mashups are pretty fucking cool if they're done well. 

next one is NIN and Beatles





i hated both mixes..eww, most mashups simply do not work.

jackie wilson went by numerous monikers, he was one of the first entertainers of that type of caliber we associate with pop music now (michael jackson  dancing-singing type).
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 3713
Posted: #6
Quote Originally Posted by Henry-Lilly:

The Beatles are great.  Why fuck it up with that?  Why not just put chocolate syrup on your pizza while your at it... 



its one thing to say u dont like it...but im sorry to think that you feel that putting the funk brothers music to a piss poor-mediocre beatles song "fucked it up"..you do know that funk brothers played on and recorded more hits that Elvis and Beatles combined?
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 10502
Posted: #7
Quote Originally Posted by misfit_aka:



1st up, "Mr excitement", this

and to bring you back down to earth , the Beatles with the swing they wish they were capable of... ENJOY

its one thing to say u dont like it...but im sorry to think that you feel that putting the funk brothers music to a piss poor-mediocre beatles song "fucked it up"..you do know that funk brothers played on and recorded more hits that Elvis and Beatles combined?

It's one thing to say you appreciate the funk brothers, it's completely another to have to claim that the Beatles, one of the greatest bands of all time, is incapable of creating generic Funk Brothers backing music.  Get the fuck outta here.  You also forgot to mention this: the name Funk Brothers is often casually used as a catch-all designation to cover any musician who played on a Motown record.... pretty easy to rack up numbers when your "band" plays with everyone in the genre.


Misfit-  trying to cram shit into places that just don't fit.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 3713
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by Henry-Lilly:


It's one thing to say you appreciate the funk brothers, it's completely another to have to claim that the Beatles, one of the greatest bands of all time, is incapable of creating generic Funk Brothers backing music.  Get the fuck outta here.  You also forgot to mention this: the name Funk Brothers is often casually used as a catch-all designation to cover any musician who played on a Motown record.... pretty easy to rack up numbers when your "band" plays with everyone in the genre.


Misfit-  trying to cram shit into places that just don't fit.


the core of the funk bros was basically unchanged in Motown-Detroit days. there were about 8 fellas who remained a constant in many of the hits and the b-sides in that period. 

MUSCIALLY SPEAKING, the Motown sound perfected by funk bros is far more reaching (and innovating) than the beatles....and yes, the beatles were incapable of creating "generic" R&B/funk backing music, they certainly attempted it tho look back both at their records and even the get back jam session tapes. I think ur zealousness for the fab-4 has clouded ur ability to be rational (as w/most of their fans)
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 19119
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by Henry-Lilly:

The Beatles are great.  Why fuck it up with that?  Why not just put chocolate syrup on your pizza while your at it... 


Henry.......
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 10502
Posted: #10
Quote Originally Posted by misfit_aka:



the core of the funk bros was basically unchanged in Motown-Detroit days. there were about 8 fellas who remained a constant in many of the hits and the b-sides in that period. 

MUSCIALLY SPEAKING, the Motown sound perfected by funk bros is far more reaching (and innovating) than the beatles....and yes, the beatles were incapable of creating "generic" R&B/funk backing music, they certainly attempted it tho look back both at their records and even the get back jam session tapes. I think ur zealousness for the fab-4 has clouded ur ability to be rational (as w/most of their fans)

Either get your facts straight or go back to your crayons and coloring books, son.  
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 19119
Posted: #11
A strong slap down............
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 3713
Posted: #12
Quote Originally Posted by Henry-Lilly:


Either get your facts straight or go back to your crayons and coloring books, son.  


wow..u put me in my place...i bet you think paul "showtunes" McCartney is a better bass player than James Jamerson too (go ahead and go to Wikipedia cause  I know ur clueless to who he is). your completely hopeless. here is one Beatle question you can answer: which Beatle do u wanna suck off the most?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 1784
Posted: #13
Oprama and the well-endowed grouse goin' at it. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 3713
Posted: #14
that henry-lilly was beginner to embarrass himself...another foe (fool) vanquished.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 10502
Posted: #15
Quote Originally Posted by misfit_aka:



wow..u put me in my place...i bet you think paul "showtunes" McCartney is a better bass player than James Jamerson too (go ahead and go to Wikipedia cause  I know ur clueless to who he is). your completely hopeless. here is one Beatle question you can answer: which Beatle do u wanna suck off the most?

Rookie:

              After you got owned your argument was reduced to "who is a better bass player"? And then you confess your hero worship homoerotic fantasies by  suggesting anyone who appreciates good music wants to suck the musician off... just because you want to, doesn't mean everyone else wants to suck a musician off.  You are projecting your tendencies, tiny dancer.   Finally, you suggest that I am a beginner and embarrassed myself.  Do you try to be this confessional and transparent or does it come naturally?  You are a rookie subconsciously exposing his homoerotic fantasies on a gambling website... who is getting embarrassed here?   
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 3713
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by Henry-Lilly:


Rookie:

              After you got owned your argument was reduced to "who is a better bass player"? And then you confess your hero worship homoerotic fantasies by  suggesting anyone who appreciates good music wants to suck the musician off... just because you want to, doesn't mean everyone else wants to suck a musician off.  You are projecting your tendencies, tiny dancer.   Finally, you suggest that I am a beginner and embarrassed myself.  Do you try to be this confessional and transparent or does it come naturally?  You are a rookie subconsciously exposing his homoerotic fantasies on a gambling website... who is getting embarrassed here?   


where's the counter argument? or are u content with pop psychology...get a clue...
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 3713
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG:

Good stuff.............something doesn't seem right with the remix though.......that beat makes the lyrics lose its feeling imo.


I think the remix makes the lyrics more soulful (funk bros do that dont they?) compared to the original which comes off a bit melodramatic.
All Forums | Music
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
Covers Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.