17-29-2, -1,042.03, - RoR -22.2 % All that is official and will not be denied!
All is official again, my personal funds are on them
FG – Cardinals +110, Leahy/Paddack
Pitching is all Leahy, offense is a wash, except that the Cards have played a much tougher schedule to date. H/A is not a problem, as the Cards have played better on the road than the Reds at home.
FG – Rays +134, Martinez/Cole
We know not how Cole is going to perform, and won't know until he gets in a few starts, but we do know that Martinez has been excellent and can go toe-to-toe with anyone. What Yankee backers also face is that their stats are probably highly inflated, having faced the weakest schedule in MLB this year. They have played only 9 teams above .500 and have lost to 8 of them. The Rays have played 24 teams above .500 and are 13-11. Is that something you can ignore? I think not.
FG – Rangers -146, deGrom/Rodriguez
There is a lot to like/dislike about deGrom and Rodriguez, in that order, ‘nuff said. The Rangers are today’s only 5 star, dominating the Angels in every important category. If they were a better team themselves I would play them on the run line, but caution has its place. For the guy that likes a little more risk I wouldn’t dissuade him.
Play At Your Own Risk – these are not official and will not be added to the record.
HomeDresser
Put your dagger back in it's scabbard, put on your dunce cap, and return to the section reserved for trolls. And, nah, I won't bother,
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
2
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
17-29-2, -1,042.03, - RoR -22.2 % All that is official and will not be denied!
All is official again, my personal funds are on them
FG – Cardinals +110, Leahy/Paddack
Pitching is all Leahy, offense is a wash, except that the Cards have played a much tougher schedule to date. H/A is not a problem, as the Cards have played better on the road than the Reds at home.
FG – Rays +134, Martinez/Cole
We know not how Cole is going to perform, and won't know until he gets in a few starts, but we do know that Martinez has been excellent and can go toe-to-toe with anyone. What Yankee backers also face is that their stats are probably highly inflated, having faced the weakest schedule in MLB this year. They have played only 9 teams above .500 and have lost to 8 of them. The Rays have played 24 teams above .500 and are 13-11. Is that something you can ignore? I think not.
FG – Rangers -146, deGrom/Rodriguez
There is a lot to like/dislike about deGrom and Rodriguez, in that order, ‘nuff said. The Rangers are today’s only 5 star, dominating the Angels in every important category. If they were a better team themselves I would play them on the run line, but caution has its place. For the guy that likes a little more risk I wouldn’t dissuade him.
Play At Your Own Risk – these are not official and will not be added to the record.
HomeDresser
Put your dagger back in it's scabbard, put on your dunce cap, and return to the section reserved for trolls. And, nah, I won't bother,
Started to think you were losing it on that one,I am playing but not really.
I have been wondering on the advantage of playing more games than one, before Covid would spend hours reading stuff making picks but seem to have lost the drive to root for more than one a day.
GL today,
1
@KeyElement
Started to think you were losing it on that one,I am playing but not really.
I have been wondering on the advantage of playing more games than one, before Covid would spend hours reading stuff making picks but seem to have lost the drive to root for more than one a day.
How many games I play will always depend on how many I and the computer agree on. Today the Cards and Rays partially qualify because the are dogs. At the probability I computed they are projected as winners, but laying juice would eliminate them. Every day is it's own adventure.
Now, go kick Reggie's tired old arse and get his opinion, ON ANYTHING. I respect him, wisdom is the providence of age!
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
@JEG53
How many games I play will always depend on how many I and the computer agree on. Today the Cards and Rays partially qualify because the are dogs. At the probability I computed they are projected as winners, but laying juice would eliminate them. Every day is it's own adventure.
Now, go kick Reggie's tired old arse and get his opinion, ON ANYTHING. I respect him, wisdom is the providence of age!
@undermysac: What do you say? ******** Cubs have the offense, H/A, o.e.r.a., and strength of schedule Opened at -145 and have held steady, no whales behind your opinion. What do you say?
I say that the Cubs hitting woes are real, and they keep running into pitchers who won't allow them to get out of their slump. Arrighetti is certainly another one of those kind of pitchers.
Jameson Tailon is a well below average pitcher this year, and the Cubs bullpen is strung out.
Nothing changes today for the Cubs, you're welcome.
BTW, I like your bets, make sense to me.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:
@undermysac: What do you say? ******** Cubs have the offense, H/A, o.e.r.a., and strength of schedule Opened at -145 and have held steady, no whales behind your opinion. What do you say?
I say that the Cubs hitting woes are real, and they keep running into pitchers who won't allow them to get out of their slump. Arrighetti is certainly another one of those kind of pitchers.
Jameson Tailon is a well below average pitcher this year, and the Cubs bullpen is strung out.
Nothing changes today for the Cubs, you're welcome.
Go get 'em Key!!! I'm on the TB and TEX -1, and TB for the series +135 Also logged into Heritage Sports today, account is still active and a $49 balance. Who knew?! I like them better than YouWager. Can't remember when I usef them last, probably before the pandemic
Nothing a 6 team parlay won't fix
0
Quote Originally Posted by barneybeans:
Go get 'em Key!!! I'm on the TB and TEX -1, and TB for the series +135 Also logged into Heritage Sports today, account is still active and a $49 balance. Who knew?! I like them better than YouWager. Can't remember when I usef them last, probably before the pandemic
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.