The umpire reads Eddings who is 10-9 on the over averaging 9.32 runs per game. But I don't look at that. I add that in my writeups now and again because people are interested in that. I don't buy it. If you have an umpire that is 7-0 on overs averaging 11 runs per game and has a small strike zone, yet goes to Petco to be the home plate ump for a Lincecum/Peavy matchup, does that automatically mean the game will go over? Not at all. It could very well be a 1-0 win for somebody. So I don't look into it but those were his stats. Also, your 100% right with the Twins bullpen. Keppel, Mijares, and Duensing were used on both days, Guerrier was used for 2 innings in Texas, Mulvey made his MLB debut yesterday and got the out he was called upon to do. and Dickey was only used in Texas and blew that game by giving up the home run to Kinsler and he has not been good recently. And Nathan wasn't used the last 2 games but the way I see this game turning out, I think we can make that a 3rd straight game without an appearance by Nathan.
The umpire reads Eddings who is 10-9 on the over averaging 9.32 runs per game. But I don't look at that. I add that in my writeups now and again because people are interested in that. I don't buy it. If you have an umpire that is 7-0 on overs averaging 11 runs per game and has a small strike zone, yet goes to Petco to be the home plate ump for a Lincecum/Peavy matchup, does that automatically mean the game will go over? Not at all. It could very well be a 1-0 win for somebody. So I don't look into it but those were his stats. Also, your 100% right with the Twins bullpen. Keppel, Mijares, and Duensing were used on both days, Guerrier was used for 2 innings in Texas, Mulvey made his MLB debut yesterday and got the out he was called upon to do. and Dickey was only used in Texas and blew that game by giving up the home run to Kinsler and he has not been good recently. And Nathan wasn't used the last 2 games but the way I see this game turning out, I think we can make that a 3rd straight game without an appearance by Nathan.
True, but 7 of those walks were in his return. In his next game he got 4 in an inning more. He can't get worse...can he? And the Nats can make any pitcher look like an ace. And 7-1 Nats sounds better. ![]()
![]()
True, but 7 of those walks were in his return. In his next game he got 4 in an inning more. He can't get worse...can he? And the Nats can make any pitcher look like an ace. And 7-1 Nats sounds better. ![]()
![]()
Agree with the 4-4 ties. Not a fan of that shit either. Unders are usually a safe bet with Lee who has hit the under in his last 3 and 4 of his last 5. Cecil, on the other hand, is questionable. He's never average. He's either really good or really bad. Both teams aren't hitting well but the bullpens are horrendous, and all 5 games between the 2 have gone over this season while the under was 6-1 last season and 1-5 the season before that. So it seems, for what it's worth, the total goes the other way every season. Gun to my head...under. But no money of mine would go on that. ![]()
Agree with the 4-4 ties. Not a fan of that shit either. Unders are usually a safe bet with Lee who has hit the under in his last 3 and 4 of his last 5. Cecil, on the other hand, is questionable. He's never average. He's either really good or really bad. Both teams aren't hitting well but the bullpens are horrendous, and all 5 games between the 2 have gone over this season while the under was 6-1 last season and 1-5 the season before that. So it seems, for what it's worth, the total goes the other way every season. Gun to my head...under. But no money of mine would go on that. ![]()
Agree with the 4-4 ties. Not a fan of that shit either. Unders are usually a safe bet with Lee who has hit the under in his last 3 and 4 of his last 5. Cecil, on the other hand, is questionable. He's never average. He's either really good or really bad. Both teams aren't hitting well but the bullpens are horrendous, and all 5 games between the 2 have gone over this season while the under was 6-1 last season and 1-5 the season before that. So it seems, for what it's worth, the total goes the other way every season. Gun to my head...under. But no money of mine would go on that. ![]()
Agree with the 4-4 ties. Not a fan of that shit either. Unders are usually a safe bet with Lee who has hit the under in his last 3 and 4 of his last 5. Cecil, on the other hand, is questionable. He's never average. He's either really good or really bad. Both teams aren't hitting well but the bullpens are horrendous, and all 5 games between the 2 have gone over this season while the under was 6-1 last season and 1-5 the season before that. So it seems, for what it's worth, the total goes the other way every season. Gun to my head...under. But no money of mine would go on that. ![]()
Well thats not all that fair. The Rays are a great managed team, and had that 10-0 lead against the Indians. Ended up giving up 2 in the 8th and 7 in the 9th. Most with 2 outs. It happens.
Well thats not all that fair. The Rays are a great managed team, and had that 10-0 lead against the Indians. Ended up giving up 2 in the 8th and 7 in the 9th. Most with 2 outs. It happens.
I was up higher than that not to mention the money I lost on the actual game. We'll have better luck tonight. Are we going with Minnie again tonite? ![]()
I was up higher than that not to mention the money I lost on the actual game. We'll have better luck tonight. Are we going with Minnie again tonite? ![]()
That's what I did. Two line parlay on the Rox/Phillies and another on Rox/LAD. GL tonite!
That's what I did. Two line parlay on the Rox/Phillies and another on Rox/LAD. GL tonite!
Great write up! I was already on the Phillies but feel even better about it now. BOL on all your plays tonight. ![]()
Great write up! I was already on the Phillies but feel even better about it now. BOL on all your plays tonight. ![]()
Actually...I don't think I am good at all. I'm actually below average. I just like to share my knowledge of the game and give my point of view on games that I like. ![]()
Actually...I don't think I am good at all. I'm actually below average. I just like to share my knowledge of the game and give my point of view on games that I like. ![]()
For what it's worth...I don't think the Twins are pathetic. I did when I posted this thread in July...but not now. Nor did I last season...it was just a funny sequence they were going through.
And yes...they beat the Yankees by 2 yesterday...but without Cano, Tex and Nick Johnson. And like you said...it's Spring Training. It's as meaningless as me beating the Twins in The Show. Once the season starts...players take an entirely new approach to the game.
![]()
For what it's worth...I don't think the Twins are pathetic. I did when I posted this thread in July...but not now. Nor did I last season...it was just a funny sequence they were going through.
And yes...they beat the Yankees by 2 yesterday...but without Cano, Tex and Nick Johnson. And like you said...it's Spring Training. It's as meaningless as me beating the Twins in The Show. Once the season starts...players take an entirely new approach to the game.
![]()

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.