All Forums | MLB Betting Forum

Weeble's Thursday Picks

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 19855
Posts: 138
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 516
Posted: #51
Quote Originally Posted by weeble5672:



Don't really know much about him and I'm always weary about betting on a team or their team total when facing a relatively unknown. However, my play is based on the Rockies bats and Mets pen and not so much on the Mets starter.


Thanks Weeble! Total went to O3(-120) @ Bovada for me, still torn but hard to imagine not at least getting a push at worst. Thanks for the extra info, Nix.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2002
Posts: 15695
Posted: #52

As always... best of luck my friend.

 

Cheers

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 26
Posted: #53
weeble, would you still play St. Louis TT over at 5.5?

That's what my line is now showing.

Thanks.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 199
Posted: #54
Thanks Weeble!! Rollin with the picks today BOL!
 
Covers Referee
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 96568
Posted: #55
Quote Originally Posted by agkil1125:

weeble, would you still play St. Louis TT over at 5.5?

That's what my line is now showing.

Thanks.


Ugh...that's a tough one. 50/50.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 18166
Posted: #56
Rollin with you on the Cards Team Total Weeb! GL to us!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 3010
Posted: #57

You're having a hell of a year! Good luck today.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 26
Posted: #58
Damn :)
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 26
Posted: #59
maybe I should just play St Louis -1.5?

If they score 5 or more, that should be in play I would think.

Thoughts?
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 26688
Posted: #60
They are probally both dumb plays but I put a little money on both dogs,we have hit Colo a few times in this series so a sweep seems out of line with this pitcher,but +140 is just a dumb line here also,then +265,I promised myself if I woke up before it started I would put a bet on it,I had -165 for under,just didnt want to play that high,-140 is my limit,
so 2-1 Tor.win works,lol.
 
Covers Referee
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 96568
Posted: #61
Quote Originally Posted by agkil1125:

maybe I should just play St Louis -1.5?

If they score 5 or more, that should be in play I would think.

Thoughts?


Yeah...I'd recommend the RL over the TT. Granted, I hate laying that money on a home team RL. BOL with whatever you decide.
 
Covers Referee
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 96568
Posted: #62
Quote Originally Posted by JEG53:

They are probally both dumb plays but I put a little money on both dogs,we have hit Colo a few times in this series so a sweep seems out of line with this pitcher,but +140 is just a dumb line here also,then +265,I promised myself if I woke up before it started I would put a bet on it,I had -165 for under,just didnt want to play that high,-140 is my limit,
so 2-1 Tor.win works,lol.


Not dumb at all. You get a split and you're up a nice chunk of change. BOL
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 826
Posted: #63
Quote Originally Posted by weeble5672:



Fits into a "system" I've been trying. But I really just say system for lack of a better term. So far it's 5-3 but could very well be 8-0 as one of the losses was by a point and the other two were by half-a-point. Still...tail at your own risk. But then again, I suppose that's redundant.


I'm on it for $100... This is strictly a "bc I'm a degenerate" type-bet.
Gotta love pre-season football!

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 8768
Posted: #64
Quote Originally Posted by agkil1125:

maybe I should just play St Louis -1.5?

If they score 5 or more, that should be in play I would think.

Thoughts?



 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 570
Posted: #65
woke up too late for these day games.. 
i swore last nite that the dogs would bite today
i think they will tonight as well
missed some key + odds in tor 1st 5 and astros +1.5
You know the public is all over the 2 big faves;
But that's exactly what the books wanted;
After cashing on 2 runlines they make stl -300;
Easy pick for houston imo .. whatever .. nothing i say matters now;
Cuz im not makin shit off it; Gonna grab breakfast and cap the shit that's left on the board :(
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 3147
Posted: #66
Quote Originally Posted by kG-bRoOkLyN:

woke up too late for these day games.. 
i swore last nite that the dogs would bite today
i think they will tonight as well
missed some key + odds in tor 1st 5 and astros +1.5
You know the public is all over the 2 big faves;
But that's exactly what the books wanted;
After cashing on 2 runlines they make stl -300;
Easy pick for houston imo .. whatever .. nothing i say matters now;
Cuz im not makin shit off it; Gonna grab breakfast and cap the shit that's left on the board :(

Houston the easy pick?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 473
Posted: #67
cards over 5 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 1256
Posted: #68
Good luck Weeble...
 
Covers Referee
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 96568
Posted: #69
Not happy about the Tigers comeback to tie it in the 8th. Firstly, I'm a Jays fan. Secondly, if it stays 2-2 through 9, the Jays will keep getting chances to get that 3rd run...and maybe more.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 4583
Posted: #70
good luck weebs..
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 8768
Posted: #71
weeble opinions about the angels/red sox over/under 9.5?
 
Covers Referee
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 96568
Posted: #72
Quote Originally Posted by weeble5672:

NFL Preseason Picks (5-3)

Cards +3
Jags/Ravens Over 41




Other game that I like but just didn't make the cut...

Packers/Bengals Under 45


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 26
Posted: #73
So a no-play here, boss?

Other game that I like but just didn't make the cut...

Packers/Bengals Under 45

 
Covers Referee
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 96568
Posted: #74
Quote Originally Posted by Crockie:

weeble opinions about the angels/red sox over/under 9.5?


Wilson has an 8.31 ERA and 1.98 WHIP in his last 4 starts. Morales is a gascan waiting to happen, IMO. Both teams are in the top 7 in the majors in BA vs LH. Angels' pen has an ERA of 4.01 (which is in the bottom 10 of the league) and, despite the decent 3.24 ERA, I don't trust the Sox pen as far as I can throw them. Tim McClelland is the home plate umpire and he's always good to have behind the plate when you're on an over.

Like the over but, then again, so do a lot of other people.
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 53
Posted: #75
Quote Originally Posted by weeble5672:



Other game that I like but just didn't make the cut...

Packers/Bengals Under 45




tease this with your other 2 picks maybe? I know some people hate teasers but just a thought!
All Forums | MLB Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.