Ummm...Kershaw opens at + money???!!!
I don't post much and I also don't bet a ton of MLB games..I do pick my spots though. I look for odd totals and spreads where the oddsmakers are SCREAMING something at you. Like when you see a day Cubs game with a total of 13.5. Anyways...
I don't post much and I also don't bet a ton of MLB games..I do pick my spots though. I look for odd totals and spreads where the oddsmakers are SCREAMING something at you. Like when you see a day Cubs game with a total of 13.5. Anyways...
Arizona is the third best offense against left-handed starters this season. By contrast, the Dodgers rank 20th against righties on the season (and without Kemp and Ethier their production drops even further). Throw in home field advantage and it's easy to see how the Diamondbacks can be favored. My model has Arizona -128.
Arizona is the third best offense against left-handed starters this season. By contrast, the Dodgers rank 20th against righties on the season (and without Kemp and Ethier their production drops even further). Throw in home field advantage and it's easy to see how the Diamondbacks can be favored. My model has Arizona -128.
When I see a line like this I don't even waste my time looking into things. There is no edge I will find that the oddsmakers haven't figured into it already. My point...I agree it's pickem game because of the lineup dodgers are throwing out there but it's still amazing to see Kershaw at this price. You know how many dopes will just bet dodgers with their ace on the mound?
When I see a line like this I don't even waste my time looking into things. There is no edge I will find that the oddsmakers haven't figured into it already. My point...I agree it's pickem game because of the lineup dodgers are throwing out there but it's still amazing to see Kershaw at this price. You know how many dopes will just bet dodgers with their ace on the mound?
When I see a line like this I don't even waste my time looking into things. There is no edge I will find that the oddsmakers haven't figured into it already. My point...I agree it's pickem game because of the lineup dodgers are throwing out there but it's still amazing to see Kershaw at this price. You know how many dopes will just bet dodgers with their ace on the mound?
When I see a line like this I don't even waste my time looking into things. There is no edge I will find that the oddsmakers haven't figured into it already. My point...I agree it's pickem game because of the lineup dodgers are throwing out there but it's still amazing to see Kershaw at this price. You know how many dopes will just bet dodgers with their ace on the mound?
Arizona is the third best offense against left-handed starters this season. By contrast, the Dodgers rank 20th against righties on the season (and without Kemp and Ethier their production drops even further). Throw in home field advantage and it's easy to see how the Diamondbacks can be favored. My model has Arizona -128.
IMHO your model is way off especially when you consider that in eight starts against Arizona since 2010, Kershaw is 7-1 with a 1.23 ERA.
He hasn't allowed a run in half of those starts - including May 14, when the left-hander yielded four hits and three walks over seven innings of a 3-1 win. So in my view the line is right with Kershaw as the fav.
Kershaw owns the snakes but I must point out that it is no guarantee that Kershaw will have a gem against the snakes tonite, especially when that team is desperate for a win after 7 straight losses but it appears to look like he will because of the horrible slump the snakes are in right now.
I can see the snakes finally winning 2morrow when Billingsley takes the hill for the doyers but not tonite. ![]()
![]()
Arizona is the third best offense against left-handed starters this season. By contrast, the Dodgers rank 20th against righties on the season (and without Kemp and Ethier their production drops even further). Throw in home field advantage and it's easy to see how the Diamondbacks can be favored. My model has Arizona -128.
IMHO your model is way off especially when you consider that in eight starts against Arizona since 2010, Kershaw is 7-1 with a 1.23 ERA.
He hasn't allowed a run in half of those starts - including May 14, when the left-hander yielded four hits and three walks over seven innings of a 3-1 win. So in my view the line is right with Kershaw as the fav.
Kershaw owns the snakes but I must point out that it is no guarantee that Kershaw will have a gem against the snakes tonite, especially when that team is desperate for a win after 7 straight losses but it appears to look like he will because of the horrible slump the snakes are in right now.
I can see the snakes finally winning 2morrow when Billingsley takes the hill for the doyers but not tonite. ![]()
![]()
IMHO your model is way off especially when you consider that in eight starts against Arizona since 2010, Kershaw is 7-1 with a 1.23 ERA.
He hasn't allowed a run in half of those starts - including May 14, when the left-hander yielded four hits and three walks over seven innings of a 3-1 win. So in my view the line is right with Kershaw as the fav.
Kershaw owns the snakes but I must point out that it is no guarantee that Kershaw will have a gem against the snakes tonite, especially when that team is desperate for a win after 7 straight losses but it appears to look like he will because of the horrible slump the snakes are in right now.
I can see the snakes finally winning 2morrow when Billingsley takes the hill for the doyers but not tonite. ![]()
![]()
IMHO your model is way off especially when you consider that in eight starts against Arizona since 2010, Kershaw is 7-1 with a 1.23 ERA.
He hasn't allowed a run in half of those starts - including May 14, when the left-hander yielded four hits and three walks over seven innings of a 3-1 win. So in my view the line is right with Kershaw as the fav.
Kershaw owns the snakes but I must point out that it is no guarantee that Kershaw will have a gem against the snakes tonite, especially when that team is desperate for a win after 7 straight losses but it appears to look like he will because of the horrible slump the snakes are in right now.
I can see the snakes finally winning 2morrow when Billingsley takes the hill for the doyers but not tonite. ![]()
![]()
You know how many dopes will just bet dodgers with their ace on the mound?
Do you blame them? Kershaw owns the snakes. And I wouldn't describe bettors who side with the doyers tonite as dopes. Especially the ones who have been fading the snakes for the past 7 games.
Those bettors need to continue fading the snakes until the streak ends. Do you recall I believe it was last year when the mariners lost something like 16 games in a row...you never really know when a streak will end, whether it be a winning or losing streak. ![]()
![]()
You know how many dopes will just bet dodgers with their ace on the mound?
Do you blame them? Kershaw owns the snakes. And I wouldn't describe bettors who side with the doyers tonite as dopes. Especially the ones who have been fading the snakes for the past 7 games.
Those bettors need to continue fading the snakes until the streak ends. Do you recall I believe it was last year when the mariners lost something like 16 games in a row...you never really know when a streak will end, whether it be a winning or losing streak. ![]()
![]()
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
449,814
-
Tuesday 09/22/2026
474
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
259,765
-
Couple thoughts
4,116
-
I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters
58,360
-
Tuesday
2,808
-
?? KBO Plays 🥎
15,112
-
Something to think about Tuesday
2,304
-
Lies, Inaccuracies & Stupidity
26,204
-
NCAA FOOTBALL. 151
23,660
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
