Posted:
#151
Im on the Unders tonight and F5 Detroit
McShady I send ya a email, If possible I would still like to enjoy access to your SS it has been very helpful all year long. Keep up the good work sir.
0
THE CHASERS LOUNGE...
Posted:
#154
I am not trying to question your intelligence or your records. All I am saying is last week Nebraska -6.5 and Louisville were listed on the spreadsheet under the -6.5 column. After both lost they were deleted from the spreadsheet. That misleads the readers and the records. Thats all I am saying. It has nothing to do with your personal records for the year. I am not trying to be a azz I just am stating fact. Now, this week, the spreadsheet reflects that -6.5 is for the "NFL Only".
Sorry you took it personal I am just pointing out that changes to the spreadsheet ae made after games are over which is mosleading, especially if someone plays them and loses like what happened last week.
Good luck to you.
0
Posted:
#156
Quote Originally Posted by McShady:
jus4
jus4
Where did I ever post Neb -6.5 & LVille -6.5 as a play? So whos cares if I delete them. All I know is you are too stupid to even pay attn. So just try and discredit me like you did PORKY. yea we all saw how you turn on someone like a lil bitch!
Go check my plays on COVERS. I hit at a 75% and share for FREE. You a gambling lost cause...
You asked me "Where did I ever post Neb -6.5 & LVille -6.5 as a play?" and then say "So whos cares if I delete them".
That statement actually contradicts each other don't they? Thats like saying "I didn't bet on the 49ers" and then saying "So who cares if I bet on the 49ers".
Thats classic.
0
Posted:
#157
Quote Originally Posted by js4u:
You asked me "Where did I ever post Neb -6.5 & LVille -6.5 as a play?" and then say "So whos cares if I delete them".
That statement actually contradicts each other don't they? Thats like saying "I didn't bet on the 49ers" and then saying "So who cares if I bet on the 49ers".
Thats classic.
Hey jack a$$
Do you have nothing better to do then to come here and start sh@t.. If you don't like what happens here do come here..There are plenty of other sites to go to..You would fit in perfect at the lock thead on cbs.
0
Posted:
#158
nase "You won't ever hear me talk negative"
westernrattler "Nothing negitive will come from me either..."
You dont have to kiss his ass....I was simply asking why plays were deleted. Is that bad to ask? Does that make a a troublemaker? If so why? I have to go back and read 100 pages to find out why? Just sayin.
0
Posted:
#159
Quote Originally Posted by McShady:
If you can can use my SS for a positive purpose...email me your screen name and ill give access. Sorry if i dont recognize u...
If you can can use my SS for a positive purpose...email me your screen name and ill give access. Sorry if i dont recognize u...
Lord, this is funny. I guess this thread is a communist thread? If anyone speaks up and asks a question they are removed from receiving information? Thats to funny. Sounds like a dictatorship to me.
0
Posted:
#160
Quote Originally Posted by js4u:
I am not trying to question your intelligence or your records. All I am saying is last week Nebraska -6.5 and Louisville were listed on the spreadsheet under the -6.5 column. After both lost they were deleted from the spreadsheet. That misleads the readers and the records. Thats all I am saying. It has nothing to do with your personal records for the year. I am not trying to be a azz I just am stating fact. Now, this week, the spreadsheet reflects that -6.5 is for the "NFL Only".
Sorry you took it personal I am just pointing out that changes to the spreadsheet ae made after games are over which is mosleading, especially if someone plays them and loses like what happened last week.
Good luck to you.
Who played the spreadsheet and lost last weekend? What ss are you looking at? 52-11 but you lost on a number last week. Do you know how stupid you look? Seriously, just don't come hang out here. Have you posted a play here? How'd that SF-9 play you dropped on another posting do for you against SEA +7,5 set number? You knew of that trend play cause you were posting here about it yet recommended the opposite with SF-9 on the trends thread on another discussion. How many people lost on your false trend info with you touting SF-9 after you were aware of the set trend from being informed on this thread? You're nothing more than a charlatan, a poseur, bugger off.
0
Posted:
#161
Quote Originally Posted by westernrattler:
I ASKED A IMPLE QUESTION AND ALL THE INDIANS COME TO DEFEND THE CHIEF.....
Hey jack a$$
Do you have nothing better to do then to come here and start sh@t.. If you don't like what happens here do come here..There are plenty of other sites to go to..You would fit in perfect at the lock thead on cbs.
0
Posted:
#162
Quote Originally Posted by Newfie_Bullet:
You just stepped on your own Dic_ bud. Ok now I have to call you out. You make a statement that I posted SF -9 which was a play supposively against a SS play right? OK, post the thread link and PROVE what you just said. Lets see how credible you are so the readers can see. I'll be waiting. Oh, and by the, no response is the same as posting false information.
Who played the spreadsheet and lost last weekend? What ss are you looking at? 52-11 but you lost on a number last week. Do you know how stupid you look? Seriously, just don't come hang out here. Have you posted a play here? How'd that SF-9 play you dropped on another posting do for you against SEA +7,5 set number? You knew of that trend play cause you were posting here about it yet recommended the opposite with SF-9 on the trends thread on another discussion. How many people lost on your false trend info with you touting SF-9 after you were aware of the set trend from being informed on this thread? You're nothing more than a charlatan, a poseur, bugger off.
0
Posted:
#166
Quote Originally Posted by McShady:
Its done. I fixed it so this scenerio wont happen again.
Did I cll you a fraud? Did I call you a loser? I simply asked a question and received no response but rather I was attacked by you and all the Indians. You still havent answered the question.
Its done. I fixed it so this scenerio wont happen again.
Im a fraud and a loser. You win. Go away
0
Posted:
#168
Quote Originally Posted by Newfie_Bullet:
Thats not me buddie but nice try.
js4u says:
10/15/12 10:24AM
With 2 even teams (SF/SEA) the line opened at -9 and that seems to tell me one thing. Why is the line so high? I see this as a 49er wager or nothing based solely on the opening line.0
Posted:
#173
Quote Originally Posted by Newfie_Bullet:
https://spaces.covers.com/blog/js4u/NFL/10152012-NFL-Strong-Team-Trends.html
Where in that quote does it say I made a play on the 49ers? Can you post that? I said a play on 49ers OR NO PLAY. Nice try again.
https://spaces.covers.com/blog/js4u/NFL/10152012-NFL-Strong-Team-Trends.html
0
Posted:
#174
Quote Originally Posted by Bettingbrothers:
@js4u - Your argument of the plays being removed are fundamentally flawed. The "plays" on the spreadsheet are not plays. No one tells you to play them. They are one man's research. How he uses them are up to him.
Let me see your spreadsheet...
If you insert plays on a spreadsheet and a record of those plays, as he does, you cannot place plays on the sheet, and then when they lose, take them off. Especially when their is a record of such plays under each spread at the top. THATS MY POINT. Is it that hard to understand?
@js4u - Your argument of the plays being removed are fundamentally flawed. The "plays" on the spreadsheet are not plays. No one tells you to play them. They are one man's research. How he uses them are up to him.
Let me see your spreadsheet...
I still havent received a answer of why they were taken off of the sheet after they lost???????
0
Posted:
#175
How is it misleading people when everyrthing on there is a TRUE statement. I know u dont know how to come up with ur own winning formula. But this how its done.
If a trend is 10-6 w/ NFL & CFB and u FILTER out a type of play (CFB) then the trend is 10-2. Wouldnt u like to know that moving forward?
You want to be spoon fed easy plays that win. I get it. But if u cant get over a couple losses that you chose and I NEVER endorsed. Whats your objective?
0
Hot Forum Topics
