I make these same plays, but choose the opposite result. I look for teams that will not score. Easy to trend, especially day games, Ace starting pitchers, etc. I know you stated it before but is there a specific stat or trend that you follow?
0
I make these same plays, but choose the opposite result. I look for teams that will not score. Easy to trend, especially day games, Ace starting pitchers, etc. I know you stated it before but is there a specific stat or trend that you follow?
I think betting on first inning scoring is like betting on the length of the National Anthem at the Superbowl...it's a shot in the dark. Why not play first 5 innings over on these same games?
Good question with a very simple answer. Because he has found a prop that is very very favorable towards the YES bet and a book that has very juicy lines, giving him a fantastic edge with tons of overlays. If he went from the 1st inning over to the 5 inning or full game over, he would lose that inherent edge.
Yes, it's a shot in the dark, but with plus odds. If you got +105 on heads on a coin flip, would you take it every time or pass on it because it's just a shot in the dark? Well, on the YES, he's getting anywhere from +105 to +115 every single time on literally a 50/50 play. Yet very few people on this site or any other realize that most books are offering this on the YES each and every day.
GL
0
Quote Originally Posted by jmpkcp44:
I think betting on first inning scoring is like betting on the length of the National Anthem at the Superbowl...it's a shot in the dark. Why not play first 5 innings over on these same games?
Good question with a very simple answer. Because he has found a prop that is very very favorable towards the YES bet and a book that has very juicy lines, giving him a fantastic edge with tons of overlays. If he went from the 1st inning over to the 5 inning or full game over, he would lose that inherent edge.
Yes, it's a shot in the dark, but with plus odds. If you got +105 on heads on a coin flip, would you take it every time or pass on it because it's just a shot in the dark? Well, on the YES, he's getting anywhere from +105 to +115 every single time on literally a 50/50 play. Yet very few people on this site or any other realize that most books are offering this on the YES each and every day.
Good question with a very simple answer. Because he has found a prop that is very very favorable towards the YES bet and a book that has very juicy lines, giving him a fantastic edge with tons of overlays. If he went from the 1st inning over to the 5 inning or full game over, he would lose that inherent edge.
Yes, it's a shot in the dark, but with plus odds. If you got +105 on heads on a coin flip, would you take it every time or pass on it because it's just a shot in the dark? Well, on the YES, he's getting anywhere from +105 to +115 every single time on literally a 50/50 play. Yet very few people on this site or any other realize that most books are offering this on the YES each and every day.
GL
Exactly, as some sharper and more observant people have noticed. I am basically pillaging the very square lines that sportsbook.ag throws at me for this prop. There is a ton of value when compared to the Pinnacle line on every single prop I play in this thread.
When this situation comes up, which is about 4 times a day on a full 15 game schedule, where I can literally arbitrage by betting yes on my book and no on pinnacle, I play about 90-95% of these opportunities. If I was not living in the U.S. I would just be betting the maximum and taking free money.
0
Quote Originally Posted by totalguy:
Good question with a very simple answer. Because he has found a prop that is very very favorable towards the YES bet and a book that has very juicy lines, giving him a fantastic edge with tons of overlays. If he went from the 1st inning over to the 5 inning or full game over, he would lose that inherent edge.
Yes, it's a shot in the dark, but with plus odds. If you got +105 on heads on a coin flip, would you take it every time or pass on it because it's just a shot in the dark? Well, on the YES, he's getting anywhere from +105 to +115 every single time on literally a 50/50 play. Yet very few people on this site or any other realize that most books are offering this on the YES each and every day.
GL
Exactly, as some sharper and more observant people have noticed. I am basically pillaging the very square lines that sportsbook.ag throws at me for this prop. There is a ton of value when compared to the Pinnacle line on every single prop I play in this thread.
When this situation comes up, which is about 4 times a day on a full 15 game schedule, where I can literally arbitrage by betting yes on my book and no on pinnacle, I play about 90-95% of these opportunities. If I was not living in the U.S. I would just be betting the maximum and taking free money.
Exactly, as some sharper and more observant people have noticed. I am basically pillaging the very square lines that sportsbook.ag throws at me for this prop. There is a ton of value when compared to the Pinnacle line on every single prop I play in this thread.
When this situation comes up, which is about 4 times a day on a full 15 game schedule, where I can literally arbitrage by betting yes on my book and no on pinnacle, I play about 90-95% of these opportunities. If I was not living in the U.S. I would just be betting the maximum and taking free money.
I've always wondered if something like that occurred often enough to be profitable. Would you please be so kind to point this out to me when it happens? Seems way to good to be true but who knows! I'm a member on both sites so would be interested to see if this actually works
0
Quote Originally Posted by Donnie_Baseball:
Exactly, as some sharper and more observant people have noticed. I am basically pillaging the very square lines that sportsbook.ag throws at me for this prop. There is a ton of value when compared to the Pinnacle line on every single prop I play in this thread.
When this situation comes up, which is about 4 times a day on a full 15 game schedule, where I can literally arbitrage by betting yes on my book and no on pinnacle, I play about 90-95% of these opportunities. If I was not living in the U.S. I would just be betting the maximum and taking free money.
I've always wondered if something like that occurred often enough to be profitable. Would you please be so kind to point this out to me when it happens? Seems way to good to be true but who knows! I'm a member on both sites so would be interested to see if this actually works
Also where we're u getting the +130s on both those games? I'm seeing 105 and 110 on the two sites. It didn't really drop over 20 cents over night did it?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Donnie_Baseball:
2-2 +.30 on 9/2
ytd is 71-67 +13.90u
9/4:
Yankees / Rays +110
Diamondbacks / Giants +130
Red Sox / Mariners +130
Rockies / Braves +110
Phillies / Reds +110
Also where we're u getting the +130s on both those games? I'm seeing 105 and 110 on the two sites. It didn't really drop over 20 cents over night did it?
sportsbook.ag has both at +130 still as of me posting this.
Are we looking at runs in the first inning? Btsecause if yes then I definitely did not see that. The line was +105 YES runs in the 1st inning. We are looking at sportsbook.com right?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Donnie_Baseball:
sportsbook.ag has both at +130 still as of me posting this.
Are we looking at runs in the first inning? Btsecause if yes then I definitely did not see that. The line was +105 YES runs in the 1st inning. We are looking at sportsbook.com right?
Are we looking at runs in the first inning? Btsecause if yes then I definitely did not see that. The line was +105 YES runs in the 1st inning. We are looking at sportsbook.com right?
www.sportsbook.ag ...yellow and black interface...run in first = yes prop for both were +130 when i posted this morning and when i reposted, i don't understand why you'd be seeing different lines.
does anyone else play these with me that saw the lines for these on sportsbook.ag today?
3-2 +1.70u tonight
74-69 +15.60u ytd
0
Quote Originally Posted by The-OG-GunClapa:
Are we looking at runs in the first inning? Btsecause if yes then I definitely did not see that. The line was +105 YES runs in the 1st inning. We are looking at sportsbook.com right?
www.sportsbook.ag ...yellow and black interface...run in first = yes prop for both were +130 when i posted this morning and when i reposted, i don't understand why you'd be seeing different lines.
does anyone else play these with me that saw the lines for these on sportsbook.ag today?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
