Only favs for 2 months

19.06.09

1. Cubs -114 +87$

2. Tigers -112 +89$

3. Mets -103 +97$

4. Red Sox -141 -100$

5. Twins -141 +70$

6. Giants -109 +91$

Friday 5-1 w-l +334$

Overall (4 days): 16-11 w-l balance +101$ and 56 days to go.

Note to "Underrated": I don't feel any embarassement for this, it's not taking more than 15 minutes per day to pick them and with the money I'm still at + balance.

20.06.09

1. Tigers -101
2. Mets -115
3. Blue Jays -116
4. Red Sox -166

I am confused about your post...
I just wrote 2 posts above that I am 59% and +101 $ in 4 days so, ARE YOU FUCKIN' RETARDED?

Ha i cannot agree enough.

Its a little thing we call "chalk" or "juice"

Thanks, let's hope it will be one of those good days, when better teams win.

haha

Back to bed bitch, you're not allowed at the computer!

5. Cubs -168

So the plays for 20.06.09 would be:

1. Tigers -101
2. Mets -115
3. Blue Jays -116
4. Red Sox -166
5. Cubs -168

i think a better idea is picking one or two underdogs a day for 2 months.  even the yanks and sox lose 40% of their games. 

Have made money vs nats, reds and stros--some seattle.  This does work its called bottom dwelling--a stock market term. Betting stocks at the bottom and when they go up, cash out!

your a fucking clown.

goodluck, ill be sure to fade your stupid system.

.. I didn't get the back to bed part btw.

To clear up things about this thread I started:

The plan goes for 60 days. The idea is to bet ONLY FAVOURITES not ALL FAVOURITES.
The theory behind this plan of mine is that better teams wins more often and they can make money for bettors as well as underdogs.
I will play for 60 days only favourites, no + money play, based on the opening lines. The way I pick the favourites to play is the trick of this approach. I have a set of rules to pick them. For instance, Reds Sox or Twins works anytime within a range of -101 to -170 when playing at home. I am looking at the recent form. I don't push my luck on teams who obvoiusly struggle. The same works for fades. For instance, I would take the other team in all Nationals game within a range of -101 to -200.
The stake is 100$ for each play.
This is an experiment I am running in order to prove that money can be made betting only favourites, carefully picked, for a period of time (2 months).
I accept constructive criticism, but do not accept posts like "stupid idea", "hahaha" and so one, without reasonnable arguments.
I will always curse the fuckers who lose their time without a purpose on this forum coming into people's threads and making critics or stupid comments without knowing what it is it all about.
I am not trying to persuade anyone to take this approach or to tail me, I am running an experiment to show the advantage of betting favourites. Tail or fade, it's up to everyone's free will.

20.06.09:

1. Tigers -101 +99$
2. Mets -115 -100$
3. Blue Jays -116 -100$
4. Red Sox -166 +60$
5. Cubs -168 +59$

Saturday: 3-2 w-l balance +18$

Overall (5 days): 19-13 w-l balance +119$, 55 days to go.

21.06.09

1. Reds -116
2. Tigers -127
3. Mets -104
4. Red Sox -124
5. Twins -122
6. Angels -126
7. Blue Jays -118