this place can be toxic..
dude comes in with a potential system, data is not much different than what's being used against bettors everyday by sportsbooks.
alexson. don't read the post if u don't like it.
if you've come to covers to blindly follow someone else's picks and make money, ur in the wrong place.
@tweets50
Yeap. There are few schools of how to manage the money cause it always comes down to a proper money management rather than predicting the outcomes. So, first rule is finding volatility. For an example: there are two teams that in the second half of the season are the teams best to martingale cause their losing streaks are measured and playing them only with 2% of the bankroll will get you thru even if from time to time they lose 3 games in a row. I have a complete data run down going many seasons back pointing out what teams are a reliable in that sense. Now, the trick is making profits with 1% unit size being martingaled when needed. With those two teams I mentioned (I'm not calling their names on purpose) there is a point running solo all the second half of the season. Otherwise quantitive models are better paying cause even if you lose certain amount of games in a long run you will still be in stride with the overall stats coming from reverse engineering. I warned at the beginning of this and the previous thread that I will not be winning each game and I might also run down my bankroll as I am testing many parameters and my bankroll is not everything I allocated for this long test.
And, I don't blame no one being pissed at my recent underperformance. opposite - I am the biggest critic of myself and that is ok. Thanks for contributing
Like I said I wish you the best. I have seen system bettors come and go through out the years. I find your system doable, however risking whole bankroll and adding bankroll is not a selling point for the forum. This could be contastraphe in one respect or could be bankroll disaster in another scenario.
Machines and Ai don't pick up what the human eye sees and sometimes goes against every number crunching system out there.
I.E. Orioles-160. Coach fired. Favored with a 13.11 ERA. Your system is just trying to pick up a loss from yesterday -125 Orioles. The line screams Orioles imo.
Good Luck this season.
Mets (NYM) @ Yankees (NYY) ML 1 NYM ML 1 2.25 +125 $125
If the line is +125 ... you are risking $100 to win $125.
My comment this morning was on your ability to post correct numbers. Too many errors on so many of your post and your daily profits/losses are off and will lose credibility on whatever results you are trying to prove at the end.
If by intention or by a mistake I bet higher sum than "normal" - how is that make me to lose creditability? And if you think my daily p/l reports are incorrect - please point them out instead of creating unnecessary mystery. And another thing - I'm not posting in order to be applauded, or "respected" or pad my ego... I'm ok with who I am and what I am and what I have and I am eternally grateful for every breath I take. What I share here is what I see myself obligated to do and doing that happily. If in any constellation it makes anyone uncomfortable or puts him or her at unease - please point that out to me and I will do my best to correct whatever is that I do wrong. But, please save me "the people may get a wrong idea" BS as I put disclaimers from the beginning warning and warning again anyone following to do that on their own risk and not do it blindly. And, I repeat it. A person should be able to come up here in this great arena for betting folk and share his ideas with live examples without being taunted by unnecessary puritanism so not fitting with what we do here.
Nationals (WSH) @ Orioles (BAL) ATS 2 BAL -1.5 3 2.25 +125 $300 
Athletics (OAK) @ Giants (SF) Totals 2 Under 8.5 3 1.83 -120 $360 
Twins (MIN) @ Brewers (MIL) ML 4 MIL ML 27 1.95 -105 $2,700 (this bet size is absolutely up to you. as I mentioned earlier - I can afford it and can afford topping up the account in case it loses. if you can't - please, either reduce the size or stay away altogether)
Mets (NYM) @ Yankees (NYY) Totals 1 Over 9.5 1 1.91 -110 $110
1-3 -$2,810
115-137
Bankroll:$3,511 -$2,810= $701
As I wrote in post #368 - I'm topping up my account with another 100 mBTC (plus minus $10K). and will post today's games.
Please do not follow my picks if you are not convinced what I am doing is right for you. I have resources available at my disposal and they are intended for creating a system. I work with my colleagues and grad students in absolute unison and feel honoured to have this opportunity.
[Quote: Originally Posted by ChatBIN]1-3 -$2,810 115-137 Bankroll:$3,511 -$2,810= $701 As I wrote in post #368 - I'm topping up my account with another 100 mBTC (plus minus $10K). and will post today's games. Please do not follow my picks if you are not convinced what I am doing is right for you. I have resources available at my disposal and they are intended for creating a system. I work with my colleagues and grad students in absolute unison and feel honoured to have this opportunity.[/
Looking forward to it. GOOD luck today...
Congratulations Professor!
I'm pretty curious - what are you're gonna do now? Will you withdraw back what you've just deposited? Or, are you gonna roll with that "enhanced" bankroll? And, I use "enhanced" to avoid using "artificial" :).
I know that everyone is entitled to have an opinion. Mine is - you're either bored rich professor who has nothing else to do with the money by Robin Hooding it... Or, you're just one of those attention person who will do anything to draw one more glance from the young audience. Which one really are you Mr Fantomas?
Just kiddin' with you (am I really?). Great job!
You don't actually want to know anything about who am I, but, want everyone to know who you are or wanna be: taking Claude Shannon's name, then talking about Fantomas? Talking about drawing attention from a young audience? Not that I really care who you are, but, you're actually are begging us to know who you are or wanna be. European (Fantomas was the protagonist in French movies in mid sixties of the last century) which also makes you pretty old. Now, who's bored? Me or you? I'm doing or at least trying to do something. How about you?
. It is OK to be sarcastic and it is Ok to believe or not to believe. It doesn't change a thing for me. I'm aware my posts can create some antagonism and disbelief. But, the positivity always overweighs the negativity. So, keyboard can take anything. And it is only a keyboard cause none of us would act the same if we met in person as we do behind the keyboards. And that is perfectly fine too. Thanks for your positive inputs!
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
