MLB - REGULAR SEASON WINS MLB - REGULAR SEASON WINS - Mar 31
ARIZONA 72 ATLANTA 88½ BALTIMORE 75½ BOSTON 95 CHICAGO Cubs 81½ CHICAGO W Sox 84½ CINCINNATI 86 CLEVELAND 71 COLORADO 87 DETROIT 83½ FLORIDA 81½ HOUSTON 72½ KANSAS CITY 70 LOS ANGELES Angels 84 LOS ANGELES Dodgers 82½ MILWAUKEE 84½ MINNESOTA 86½ NEW YORK Mets 78 NEW YORK Yankees 91½ OAKLAND 82½ PHILADELPHIA 96 PITTSBURGH 66½ SAN DIEGO 76 SAN FRANCISCO 88½ SEATTLE 70 ST. LOUIS 87½ TAMPA BAY 85 TEXAS 88 TORONTO 75½ WASHINGTON 72
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
MLB - REGULAR SEASON WINS MLB - REGULAR SEASON WINS - Mar 31
ARIZONA 72 ATLANTA 88½ BALTIMORE 75½ BOSTON 95 CHICAGO Cubs 81½ CHICAGO W Sox 84½ CINCINNATI 86 CLEVELAND 71 COLORADO 87 DETROIT 83½ FLORIDA 81½ HOUSTON 72½ KANSAS CITY 70 LOS ANGELES Angels 84 LOS ANGELES Dodgers 82½ MILWAUKEE 84½ MINNESOTA 86½ NEW YORK Mets 78 NEW YORK Yankees 91½ OAKLAND 82½ PHILADELPHIA 96 PITTSBURGH 66½ SAN DIEGO 76 SAN FRANCISCO 88½ SEATTLE 70 ST. LOUIS 87½ TAMPA BAY 85 TEXAS 88 TORONTO 75½ WASHINGTON 72
Whose in that Royals rotation? Whose in that Royals lineup? Billy Butler and Soria are the only guys that are worth anything...and Soria may even be traded mid season. Good chance they finish with the worst record in baseball.
Pirates Over 66.5? Angels Over 84?
I like the Jays Over 75.5.
Mets Under 78? A lot has to go right for them to be a .500 team so 3 games under?
0
How do the Phillies NOT win 100 games?
Whose in that Royals rotation? Whose in that Royals lineup? Billy Butler and Soria are the only guys that are worth anything...and Soria may even be traded mid season. Good chance they finish with the worst record in baseball.
Pirates Over 66.5? Angels Over 84?
I like the Jays Over 75.5.
Mets Under 78? A lot has to go right for them to be a .500 team so 3 games under?
Agree on the Phils. They won 97 last year. So they're saying 96 for this year? They add Lee and have Oswalt for a full year. Lost Werth, but I think they have enough fire power elsewhere. Over looks good.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Sparky10191:
How do the Phillies NOT win 100 games?
Trish the dish
Agree on the Phils. They won 97 last year. So they're saying 96 for this year? They add Lee and have Oswalt for a full year. Lost Werth, but I think they have enough fire power elsewhere. Over looks good.
i am a homer of course but i see no reason why the cubs won't easily go over the total. with all the injuries we had last year and piniella leaving mid season we still won 75 games. they should easily be a 500 ball club this year and that will be just enough
0
i am a homer of course but i see no reason why the cubs won't easily go over the total. with all the injuries we had last year and piniella leaving mid season we still won 75 games. they should easily be a 500 ball club this year and that will be just enough
i am a homer of course but i see no reason why the cubs won't easily go over the total. with all the injuries we had last year and piniella leaving mid season we still won 75 games. they should easily be a 500 ball club this year and that will be just enough
Really?
0
Quote Originally Posted by yuice20:
i am a homer of course but i see no reason why the cubs won't easily go over the total. with all the injuries we had last year and piniella leaving mid season we still won 75 games. they should easily be a 500 ball club this year and that will be just enough
To be honest i'd have a hard time picking the cubs over the pirates or astros ...... i'd definitely rather have the pirates roster right now over the Cubs.
0
To be honest i'd have a hard time picking the cubs over the pirates or astros ...... i'd definitely rather have the pirates roster right now over the Cubs.
To be honest i'd have a hard time picking the cubs over the pirates or astros ...... i'd definitely rather have the pirates roster right now over the Cubs.
lol sounds like a bad joke
0
Quote Originally Posted by LeafsNeedD:
To be honest i'd have a hard time picking the cubs over the pirates or astros ...... i'd definitely rather have the pirates roster right now over the Cubs.
Anyone notice these totals average 81.5333 wins per team? Obviously impossible. Books know the public loves overs, shaded lines. If you immediately started shouting over, over, over, you may want to rethink some of those choices. Remember, by September there will be a lot of "well, if so-and so hadn't gotten hurt, and 2 of my starters hadn't spent 2 months on the DL, I would easily have cashed that ticket!" Phillies 110 wins? 68%? Only projection I will make this early is that the Pirates are probably overvalued (again) and you won't need any injuries or long stints on the DL to have that shipwreck go under 66.5 BOL
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Anyone notice these totals average 81.5333 wins per team? Obviously impossible. Books know the public loves overs, shaded lines. If you immediately started shouting over, over, over, you may want to rethink some of those choices. Remember, by September there will be a lot of "well, if so-and so hadn't gotten hurt, and 2 of my starters hadn't spent 2 months on the DL, I would easily have cashed that ticket!" Phillies 110 wins? 68%? Only projection I will make this early is that the Pirates are probably overvalued (again) and you won't need any injuries or long stints on the DL to have that shipwreck go under 66.5 BOL
Be honest .... how many years in a row have you lost this exact bet?
Once, last year and I still think they would have went over 72 wins if not for all their injuries and their historically bad start due to those injuries.
I like how no one on here likes to mention how 2 years ago I said the O's would lose 100 games. I guess no likes reality.
0
Quote Originally Posted by LeafsNeedD:
Be honest .... how many years in a row have you lost this exact bet?
Once, last year and I still think they would have went over 72 wins if not for all their injuries and their historically bad start due to those injuries.
I like how no one on here likes to mention how 2 years ago I said the O's would lose 100 games. I guess no likes reality.
I know these are early but they look pretty legit to me. I hope the Cardinals line is off though eprsonally. I thought linesmaker would set it around 85 or 85.5 and I was going to jump all on the over. I still will most likely play the over just not ground n pound it out as hard
0
Quote Originally Posted by nc1capper:
where did these numbers come from
I know these are early but they look pretty legit to me. I hope the Cardinals line is off though eprsonally. I thought linesmaker would set it around 85 or 85.5 and I was going to jump all on the over. I still will most likely play the over just not ground n pound it out as hard
What was the Orioles' record on Sunday last season? I didn't follow it but I know how bad they were in recent seasons.
Unless you recall the O's being invited to play on Sunday night ESPN games (lol) last year the record of day games is more revealing than any particular day of the week, since we can rest assured all the O's Sunday games were day games.
The tally was 16-28, 36.4%, with a .252 BA, .674 OPS, 3.89 RPG Opponents tallied 28-16, 63.6%, .284 BA, .838 OPS, 5.27 RPG Considering the only starter over .500 was Guthrie with a 3-2 W/L record, it would appear the O's need to improve more than a little bit in this regard. Will they? Hard to say. The lineup is improved but those are some pretty significant differences in margin to overcome.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by Sparky10191:
What was the Orioles' record on Sunday last season? I didn't follow it but I know how bad they were in recent seasons.
Unless you recall the O's being invited to play on Sunday night ESPN games (lol) last year the record of day games is more revealing than any particular day of the week, since we can rest assured all the O's Sunday games were day games.
The tally was 16-28, 36.4%, with a .252 BA, .674 OPS, 3.89 RPG Opponents tallied 28-16, 63.6%, .284 BA, .838 OPS, 5.27 RPG Considering the only starter over .500 was Guthrie with a 3-2 W/L record, it would appear the O's need to improve more than a little bit in this regard. Will they? Hard to say. The lineup is improved but those are some pretty significant differences in margin to overcome.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.