Weird day, we basically have been up, or down less than $100
through 10 plays. Anyway, we looked good
on the late games, but in 15 minutes we went from winning the TB Rays game, and
pushing on the White Sox game, to losing them both, those are the breaks boys
and girls.
We are now -$138for the day, and going into the last game of the
week, we are guaranteed to end up
with a good week.Going into the
last game of the week, we are currently up +$1,571, and will end the week at +$1,000, or +$2,024.Good job brothers, nice week.
0
Weird day, we basically have been up, or down less than $100
through 10 plays. Anyway, we looked good
on the late games, but in 15 minutes we went from winning the TB Rays game, and
pushing on the White Sox game, to losing them both, those are the breaks boys
and girls.
We are now -$138for the day, and going into the last game of the
week, we are guaranteed to end up
with a good week.Going into the
last game of the week, we are currently up +$1,571, and will end the week at +$1,000, or +$2,024.Good job brothers, nice week.
I know you did not ask for my opinion, but I would not spot 3.5 runs if I had the Blue Jays at home with David Price pitching vs the Mariners if they had started Jeremy Gutherie on loan from the Royals. That is not a good play no matter win or lose bro. Just thought I'd put my 2 cents in on that
0
Quote Originally Posted by SoulCall:
Yup, not lookin pretty lol
I know you did not ask for my opinion, but I would not spot 3.5 runs if I had the Blue Jays at home with David Price pitching vs the Mariners if they had started Jeremy Gutherie on loan from the Royals. That is not a good play no matter win or lose bro. Just thought I'd put my 2 cents in on that
I know you did not ask for my opinion, but I would not spot 3.5 runs if I had the Blue Jays at home with David Price pitching vs the Mariners if they had started Jeremy Gutherie on loan from the Royals. That is not a good play no matter win or lose bro. Just thought I'd put my 2 cents in on that
Actually I think I would with the current Seattle bullpen!
0
Quote Originally Posted by jstaley12:
Quote Originally Posted by SoulCall:
Yup, not lookin pretty lol
I know you did not ask for my opinion, but I would not spot 3.5 runs if I had the Blue Jays at home with David Price pitching vs the Mariners if they had started Jeremy Gutherie on loan from the Royals. That is not a good play no matter win or lose bro. Just thought I'd put my 2 cents in on that
Actually I think I would with the current Seattle bullpen!
I know you did not ask for my opinion, but I would not spot 3.5 runs if I had the Blue Jays at home with David Price pitching vs the Mariners if they had started Jeremy Gutherie on loan from the Royals. That is not a good play no matter win or lose bro. Just thought I'd put my 2 cents in on that Actually I think I would with the current Seattle bullpen!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Julespussy:
I know you did not ask for my opinion, but I would not spot 3.5 runs if I had the Blue Jays at home with David Price pitching vs the Mariners if they had started Jeremy Gutherie on loan from the Royals. That is not a good play no matter win or lose bro. Just thought I'd put my 2 cents in on that Actually I think I would with the current Seattle bullpen!
I know you did not ask for my opinion, but I would not spot 3.5 runs if I had the Blue Jays at home with David Price pitching vs the Mariners if they had started Jeremy Gutherie on loan from the Royals. That is not a good play no matter win or lose bro. Just thought I'd put my 2 cents in on that Actually I think I would with the current Seattle bullpen!
I would not spot 3.5 runs for $0.25 cents with any two teams, not a chance, no possible way, even a quarter is my quarter, and I'd rather not have any action than to donate, but that is just me
0
Quote Originally Posted by Julespussy:
I know you did not ask for my opinion, but I would not spot 3.5 runs if I had the Blue Jays at home with David Price pitching vs the Mariners if they had started Jeremy Gutherie on loan from the Royals. That is not a good play no matter win or lose bro. Just thought I'd put my 2 cents in on that Actually I think I would with the current Seattle bullpen!
I would not spot 3.5 runs for $0.25 cents with any two teams, not a chance, no possible way, even a quarter is my quarter, and I'd rather not have any action than to donate, but that is just me
Congrats on another successful week, as days don't really matter as long as it's + at the end of the week (but conrats on your winning day as well)
Unfortunately, I was out and about most of the day and making Plays off my cell w/o being able to check the Covers site and see what you, and others were Playing and why. I ended up +1.45 Units for the day, but would've been closer to $1K had Crawfords Ground Rule Double allowed Susac to go home as he should've been allowed to ( it directly affected 3 separate wagers). Know now you were on the Pirates (Nice call on that one too), but wondering what your "Spot On" (lLol) take was on that play? I saw a similar situation, I believe in the Jays/ Angels game earlier in the weekend where Buatista was awarded home on a G.R.D. where he wasn't nearly as likely to score as Susac was tonight. ESPN made it sound like it was cut an dry call, but I'm not so sure, and wondering (You being on Bucco's aside) what you thought about that? (remembering that you still could've won your wager with that run scoring)
0
Congrats on another successful week, as days don't really matter as long as it's + at the end of the week (but conrats on your winning day as well)
Unfortunately, I was out and about most of the day and making Plays off my cell w/o being able to check the Covers site and see what you, and others were Playing and why. I ended up +1.45 Units for the day, but would've been closer to $1K had Crawfords Ground Rule Double allowed Susac to go home as he should've been allowed to ( it directly affected 3 separate wagers). Know now you were on the Pirates (Nice call on that one too), but wondering what your "Spot On" (lLol) take was on that play? I saw a similar situation, I believe in the Jays/ Angels game earlier in the weekend where Buatista was awarded home on a G.R.D. where he wasn't nearly as likely to score as Susac was tonight. ESPN made it sound like it was cut an dry call, but I'm not so sure, and wondering (You being on Bucco's aside) what you thought about that? (remembering that you still could've won your wager with that run scoring)
Congrats on another successful week, as days don't really matter as long as it's + at the end of the week (but conrats on your winning day as well)
Unfortunately, I was out and about most of the day and making Plays off my cell w/o being able to check the Covers site and see what you, and others were Playing and why. I ended up +1.45 Units for the day, but would've been closer to $1K had Crawfords Ground Rule Double allowed Susac to go home as he should've been allowed to ( it directly affected 3 separate wagers). Know now you were on the Pirates (Nice call on that one too), but wondering what your "Spot On" (lLol) take was on that play? I saw a similar situation, I believe in the Jays/ Angels game earlier in the weekend where Buatista was awarded home on a G.R.D. where he wasn't nearly as likely to score as Susac was tonight. ESPN made it sound like it was cut an dry call, but I'm not so sure, and wondering (You being on Bucco's aside) what you thought about that? (remembering that you still could've won your wager with that run scoring)
It doesn't matter if I would have still won, or not, if you ask me I will give you my opinion directly, and honestly Hog. As far as the clearly stated rules are set, and always have been as long as I can remember, each base runner, and the batter get 2 bases total on a Ground Rule Double. No umpire has the authority, or right to award any more, or any less, no more than a Judge has the right to create judicial laws, all Umpires and Judges are authorized to do is uphold the rules/laws as they are written.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Hog_Wild:
Congrats on another successful week, as days don't really matter as long as it's + at the end of the week (but conrats on your winning day as well)
Unfortunately, I was out and about most of the day and making Plays off my cell w/o being able to check the Covers site and see what you, and others were Playing and why. I ended up +1.45 Units for the day, but would've been closer to $1K had Crawfords Ground Rule Double allowed Susac to go home as he should've been allowed to ( it directly affected 3 separate wagers). Know now you were on the Pirates (Nice call on that one too), but wondering what your "Spot On" (lLol) take was on that play? I saw a similar situation, I believe in the Jays/ Angels game earlier in the weekend where Buatista was awarded home on a G.R.D. where he wasn't nearly as likely to score as Susac was tonight. ESPN made it sound like it was cut an dry call, but I'm not so sure, and wondering (You being on Bucco's aside) what you thought about that? (remembering that you still could've won your wager with that run scoring)
It doesn't matter if I would have still won, or not, if you ask me I will give you my opinion directly, and honestly Hog. As far as the clearly stated rules are set, and always have been as long as I can remember, each base runner, and the batter get 2 bases total on a Ground Rule Double. No umpire has the authority, or right to award any more, or any less, no more than a Judge has the right to create judicial laws, all Umpires and Judges are authorized to do is uphold the rules/laws as they are written.
Thanks Jstaley. I thought so too, but am almost positive that the Umps awarded Bautista (it could've been someone else) home from 1st this weekend on a similar situation.
0
Thanks Jstaley. I thought so too, but am almost positive that the Umps awarded Bautista (it could've been someone else) home from 1st this weekend on a similar situation.
You are welcome Jakey24, glad I could help.It won’t be a matter of ‘getting tired of
this’ nearly as much as a time issue.This endeavor of proving the negative minded sorts wrong in their saying
“baseball can’t be beat”, “it will get you eventually”, and “you can’t make
money long term betting sports” has been much more time consuming than I
anticipated X 5.…….Yeah Hog_Wild, I am not sure what play you are talking
about, let me know if/when you find out.
0
You are welcome Jakey24, glad I could help.It won’t be a matter of ‘getting tired of
this’ nearly as much as a time issue.This endeavor of proving the negative minded sorts wrong in their saying
“baseball can’t be beat”, “it will get you eventually”, and “you can’t make
money long term betting sports” has been much more time consuming than I
anticipated X 5.…….Yeah Hog_Wild, I am not sure what play you are talking
about, let me know if/when you find out.
hey mate, you had made mention about a free bet offer and gave the breakdowns on how to go about collecting free money (which we all love).. are you able to post the breakdown again>? i couldnt find it! cheers
0
hey mate, you had made mention about a free bet offer and gave the breakdowns on how to go about collecting free money (which we all love).. are you able to post the breakdown again>? i couldnt find it! cheers
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.