According to the chart, the physical aspect is about 1/2 way
between the bottom and neutral. How does this get to be B-/C+? What grade would neutral get? Also, what exactly do the maroon and green blocks represent?
0
[Quote: Originally Posted by HappyKane]
Stew Baker - B-/C+ grades are the "in-between" ones.
His chart is not good enough for a B grade nor is it bad enough to be a C grade.
According to the chart, the physical aspect is about 1/2 way
between the bottom and neutral. How does this get to be B-/C+? What grade would neutral get? Also, what exactly do the maroon and green blocks represent?
Getting back to Tim Stauffer's bio chart from yesterday, the physical aspect is about 1/2 way
between the bottom and neutral. How does this get to be B-/C+? What grade would neutral get? Also, what exactly do the maroon and green blocks represent?
0
Getting back to Tim Stauffer's bio chart from yesterday, the physical aspect is about 1/2 way
between the bottom and neutral. How does this get to be B-/C+? What grade would neutral get? Also, what exactly do the maroon and green blocks represent?
Stew Baker - Maroon & red are the critical phase of the cycle and green and bright green are the optimal phase of the cycle.
Even though Stauffer's physical line is in the critical part of the graph, i can't really give him a C grade. Thats also in part because of his chart shifting to the optimal side of things; it doesn't look all that good on Monday but Tuesday's grade would be in the B- range. And Sunday's grade would be in the C- range. What's in between? I had to formulate something that was easily decipherable (at least to my eyes), which was the B-/C+ grade.
0
Stew Baker - Maroon & red are the critical phase of the cycle and green and bright green are the optimal phase of the cycle.
Even though Stauffer's physical line is in the critical part of the graph, i can't really give him a C grade. Thats also in part because of his chart shifting to the optimal side of things; it doesn't look all that good on Monday but Tuesday's grade would be in the B- range. And Sunday's grade would be in the C- range. What's in between? I had to formulate something that was easily decipherable (at least to my eyes), which was the B-/C+ grade.
COOL COLORS = good ratings/grades = lucky ephemerides
WARM COLORS = bad ratings/grades = unlucky ephemerides
+ = high or optimal physical bio
- = low or critical physical bio
Jeff Suppan (5-7, 4.43) C- is 13-3 w/a 4.22 ERA in twenty-two career starts against the Pirates. Including his 1-year stint w/ the Pirates, Suppan have pitched well in PNC Park; 10-5 lifetime w/approx a 3.79 ERA. Check out Suppan's road/home splits for 2009.
Paul Maholm (6-4, 4.28) B-/C+ is 2-5 w/a 4.38 ERA in twelve career starts against the Brewers.
Carlos Zambrano (6-4, 3.36) B- is 3-3 w/a 3.38 ERA in seven career starts against the Phillies.
Jamie Moyer (9-6, 5.58) C+ is 3-0 w/a 4.19 ERA in six career starts against the Cubs.
Bronson Arroyo (10-8, 5.07) C- is 1-3 w/a 4.46 ERA against the Dodgers.
Chad Billingsley (9-5, 3.76) B- is 2-1 w/a 0.92 ERA against the Reds.
0
Wednesday, July 22nd - Pitchers' #'s & Ratings:
COOL COLORS = good ratings/grades = lucky ephemerides
WARM COLORS = bad ratings/grades = unlucky ephemerides
+ = high or optimal physical bio
- = low or critical physical bio
Jeff Suppan (5-7, 4.43) C- is 13-3 w/a 4.22 ERA in twenty-two career starts against the Pirates. Including his 1-year stint w/ the Pirates, Suppan have pitched well in PNC Park; 10-5 lifetime w/approx a 3.79 ERA. Check out Suppan's road/home splits for 2009.
Paul Maholm (6-4, 4.28) B-/C+ is 2-5 w/a 4.38 ERA in twelve career starts against the Brewers.
Carlos Zambrano (6-4, 3.36) B- is 3-3 w/a 3.38 ERA in seven career starts against the Phillies.
Jamie Moyer (9-6, 5.58) C+ is 3-0 w/a 4.19 ERA in six career starts against the Cubs.
Jason Berken - Really. Who wants to burn their money on this pitcher?
Jon Garland - I've seen Garland pitch well on the road this year. But he continues to be a victim of run support and bullpen issues.
Trevor Cahill - Great spot for the Twins to salvage a game here. Just a hunch.
Félix Hernández - King Felix could pitch well but i fear he might not get enough run support in this spot. I was hoping this would be a day game because Galarraga is almost a full 2 runs better in ERA in day games.
Tim Lincecum - Pitch as good as you can but if you're not getting run support, you're... SOL. This is a matchup where i may have to take a close look at the bullpens.
Craig Stammen - One of the most underwhelming pitcher in the league; very mediocre fastball. Gets overworked in later innings; this kid will be shelved in the bullpen soon.
Roy Oswalt - I do want to see Oswalt get a win here but i just don't see the Cardinals getting swept.
Bronson Arroyo - If Chad Billingsley was on the Reds, he'd be their ace. Reds are pitiful against the Dodgers and they're going to prove it again.
Possible values/winners for Wednesday:
NY Yankees RL
Minnesota Twins +100
Red Sox/Rangers Under
LA Dodgers RL
0
Pitchers i'm avoiding/fading on Wednesday:
Jason Berken - Really. Who wants to burn their money on this pitcher?
Jon Garland - I've seen Garland pitch well on the road this year. But he continues to be a victim of run support and bullpen issues.
Trevor Cahill - Great spot for the Twins to salvage a game here. Just a hunch.
Félix Hernández - King Felix could pitch well but i fear he might not get enough run support in this spot. I was hoping this would be a day game because Galarraga is almost a full 2 runs better in ERA in day games.
Tim Lincecum - Pitch as good as you can but if you're not getting run support, you're... SOL. This is a matchup where i may have to take a close look at the bullpens.
Craig Stammen - One of the most underwhelming pitcher in the league; very mediocre fastball. Gets overworked in later innings; this kid will be shelved in the bullpen soon.
Roy Oswalt - I do want to see Oswalt get a win here but i just don't see the Cardinals getting swept.
Bronson Arroyo - If Chad Billingsley was on the Reds, he'd be their ace. Reds are pitiful against the Dodgers and they're going to prove it again.
Loving the Angels on Wednesday as they go for the sweep.
Royals suck against lefties. Royals are 5-16 in their last 21 games versus a left-handed starter.
Joe Saunders is having some problems on the road this season but he has a lifetime record of 21-10 in road games. And Joe Saunders isn't in top form but this is a good spot for him to bounce back. A good spot because he's dominated the Royals before and he should have his confidence back knowing that. Joe Saunders is 2-0 w/a 0.56 ERA against the Royals.
Angels are 0-4 in Saunders' last 4 road starts. But the Angels are road warriors and they have a good chance to go 1-4 with Saunders on the road when they sweep the Royals on Wednesday.
The are killing the Royals and they're doing it w/o the services of Vlad and Torii.
Check out Brian Bannister's night splits. For whatever reason, the guy just doesn't pitch well in night games. If this was a day game, i'd give the Royals a better than average chance to salvage a win. This is one reason Bannister will always be an average pitcher; a pitcher with a lifetime sub .500 record.
Last year, when the Halos were in town, they pegged Bannister 13 times for 5 runs. And that was all they needed as the Angels won 5-3.
This is a matchup that is heavily dependent on run support.
Joe Saunders is the benefactor of 6.04 runs per start in 2009. The best run support of any Angels starter this year.
Brian Bannister is averaging a measly 3.88 run support per start.
You've seen the first two games. Now do the math.
0
Loving the Angels on Wednesday as they go for the sweep.
Royals suck against lefties. Royals are 5-16 in their last 21 games versus a left-handed starter.
Joe Saunders is having some problems on the road this season but he has a lifetime record of 21-10 in road games. And Joe Saunders isn't in top form but this is a good spot for him to bounce back. A good spot because he's dominated the Royals before and he should have his confidence back knowing that. Joe Saunders is 2-0 w/a 0.56 ERA against the Royals.
Angels are 0-4 in Saunders' last 4 road starts. But the Angels are road warriors and they have a good chance to go 1-4 with Saunders on the road when they sweep the Royals on Wednesday.
The are killing the Royals and they're doing it w/o the services of Vlad and Torii.
Check out Brian Bannister's night splits. For whatever reason, the guy just doesn't pitch well in night games. If this was a day game, i'd give the Royals a better than average chance to salvage a win. This is one reason Bannister will always be an average pitcher; a pitcher with a lifetime sub .500 record.
Last year, when the Halos were in town, they pegged Bannister 13 times for 5 runs. And that was all they needed as the Angels won 5-3.
This is a matchup that is heavily dependent on run support.
Joe Saunders is the benefactor of 6.04 runs per start in 2009. The best run support of any Angels starter this year.
Brian Bannister is averaging a measly 3.88 run support per start.
Craig Stammen - One of the most underwhelming pitcher in the league; very mediocre fastball. Gets overworked in later innings; this kid will be shelved in the bullpen soon.
So no nats and no KC!!!! What the hell am I suppose to play oon then????
0
Craig Stammen - One of the most underwhelming pitcher in the league; very mediocre fastball. Gets overworked in later innings; this kid will be shelved in the bullpen soon.
So no nats and no KC!!!! What the hell am I suppose to play oon then????
WussieMan - Check my wagerline record for Nationals games. I usually have a good read on when to bet them.
Stammen tomorrow =
This is my lucky week man. I'm going to get to 6K and hit the casinos and play with orange and purple chips this week. Or maybe a grey chip on just 1 hand of blackjack.
Heck, since its all on house money, i might even do a 5 or 6 team parlay hehe.
Well, i would've went 6-0 today if i didn't worry so much about what Brandon Lang was on.
Detroit Tigers -1½ +134
Red Sox/Rangers Under 9½ -107
Houston Astros -149
LA Dodgers -1½ +110
Milwaukee Brewers
Tampa Bay Rays
0
WussieMan - Check my wagerline record for Nationals games. I usually have a good read on when to bet them.
Stammen tomorrow =
This is my lucky week man. I'm going to get to 6K and hit the casinos and play with orange and purple chips this week. Or maybe a grey chip on just 1 hand of blackjack.
Heck, since its all on house money, i might even do a 5 or 6 team parlay hehe.
Well, i would've went 6-0 today if i didn't worry so much about what Brandon Lang was on.
WussieMan - 1st of all, get a Pulp Fiction avatar and catch some of my mojo. I'm going to start a Pulp Fiction cult on Covers.com.
Clay Buchholz - nope. Not a good day to fade him. Not that you can't or shouldn't. Its because of Vicente Padilla. Don't mean to be vain but this is one Nica i usually have a very good read on. I'm probably something like 386-5 on games involving Vicente Padilla. Yeah.
There are a lot of good trends for Padilla in the Covers.com trends section, but i applore y'all to ignore 'em.
Theres only one thing you need to know about Vicente Padilla to make money with him or against him, write this on your wall.
1) Vicente Padilla do not get wins unless he gets at least 5 runs in support.
Quoting Jair Jurrjens of the Atlanta Braves, "Baseball is about luck. You can pitch good and not get the win. You can pitch bad and no get the loss."
I usually get a good read on Padilla because of his "luck" factor. What do i mean? Well. On his lucky day, Padilla gets lots of run support from the Rangers bats. On his unlucky day, Padilla will surely lose if he doesn't get more than 4 runs of support.
Wednesday, July 22, 2009 is Vicente Padilla's unlucky day.
In short, take the the Red Sox.
0
WussieMan - 1st of all, get a Pulp Fiction avatar and catch some of my mojo. I'm going to start a Pulp Fiction cult on Covers.com.
Clay Buchholz - nope. Not a good day to fade him. Not that you can't or shouldn't. Its because of Vicente Padilla. Don't mean to be vain but this is one Nica i usually have a very good read on. I'm probably something like 386-5 on games involving Vicente Padilla. Yeah.
There are a lot of good trends for Padilla in the Covers.com trends section, but i applore y'all to ignore 'em.
Theres only one thing you need to know about Vicente Padilla to make money with him or against him, write this on your wall.
1) Vicente Padilla do not get wins unless he gets at least 5 runs in support.
Quoting Jair Jurrjens of the Atlanta Braves, "Baseball is about luck. You can pitch good and not get the win. You can pitch bad and no get the loss."
I usually get a good read on Padilla because of his "luck" factor. What do i mean? Well. On his lucky day, Padilla gets lots of run support from the Rangers bats. On his unlucky day, Padilla will surely lose if he doesn't get more than 4 runs of support.
Wednesday, July 22, 2009 is Vicente Padilla's unlucky day.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.