The only other plays I am looking at are the A's and the Det/Tex over. The former is much more likely than the latter. But an over heavy ump could change this.
** Milwaukee -1.5 -122 4.4 UNITS ** Chi Sox -1.5 -110 4.26 UNITS
~ Today's card ~ ** Pittsburgh +124 3.57 UNITS ** Boston -111 4.2 UNITS ** Milwaukee -1.5 -114 4.4 UNITS ** Chi Sox -1.5 -110 4.26 UNITS
0
The only other plays I am looking at are the A's and the Det/Tex over. The former is much more likely than the latter. But an over heavy ump could change this.
** Milwaukee -1.5 -122 4.4 UNITS ** Chi Sox -1.5 -110 4.26 UNITS
~ Today's card ~ ** Pittsburgh +124 3.57 UNITS ** Boston -111 4.2 UNITS ** Milwaukee -1.5 -114 4.4 UNITS ** Chi Sox -1.5 -110 4.26 UNITS
~ Today's card ~ ** Pittsburgh +124 3.57 UNITS ** Boston -111 4.2 UNITS ** Milwaukee -1.5 -114 4.4 UNITS ** Chi Sox -1.5 -110 4.26 UNITS ** Oakland +134 3.42 UNITS
0
Last play of the night.
** Oakland +134 3.42 UNITS
~ Today's card ~ ** Pittsburgh +124 3.57 UNITS ** Boston -111 4.2 UNITS ** Milwaukee -1.5 -114 4.4 UNITS ** Chi Sox -1.5 -110 4.26 UNITS ** Oakland +134 3.42 UNITS
lana know this is off tangent, but considering you check out the XERA stats, how do you figure the Angels having the success they're having? i mean every single projected win/loss ratio i see, whether XERA or RA or what have you, has the Angels with at least 10 more losses, i'm asking to see if i might use that info towards leaning for the post-season props AL playoffs, any answers from you or anyone would be greatly appreciated...
0
lana know this is off tangent, but considering you check out the XERA stats, how do you figure the Angels having the success they're having? i mean every single projected win/loss ratio i see, whether XERA or RA or what have you, has the Angels with at least 10 more losses, i'm asking to see if i might use that info towards leaning for the post-season props AL playoffs, any answers from you or anyone would be greatly appreciated...
pimpdaddy and trickum -- Well, I won't say anything one way or the other except that the standard I hold myself to, when I am capping to my standards, I should be able to be tailed with excellent results. I guess you can consider me the John Starks of capping baseball -- when I'm hot, I'm really hot. But when I'm cold, I can't hit a thing. I hope I can develop more consistency over time.
0
pimpdaddy and trickum -- Well, I won't say anything one way or the other except that the standard I hold myself to, when I am capping to my standards, I should be able to be tailed with excellent results. I guess you can consider me the John Starks of capping baseball -- when I'm hot, I'm really hot. But when I'm cold, I can't hit a thing. I hope I can develop more consistency over time.
lana know this is off tangent, but considering you check out the XERA stats, how do you figure the Angels having the success they're having? i mean every single projected win/loss ratio i see, whether XERA or RA or what have you, has the Angels with at least 10 more losses, i'm asking to see if i might use that info towards leaning for the post-season props AL playoffs, any answers from you or anyone would be greatly appreciated...
Well, I try to stay away from these prop/futures bets (might change my mind for picking playoff series winners, but doubt it) but I will try to explain this as I see it. I would say the most important key to success in baseball is pitching and the Angels have lots of this. Lackey can be as good as any one on any given day, Santana has taken it to the next level and is an elite pitcher, Saunders has been phenomenal, Weaver can light it up on any day and is a very good pitcher overall. The weak link is Garland and I know plenty of teams who wish they could say this. The bullpen could be better but is still No. 11 overall. And the Angels have the No. 8 defense, which is key as well.
As far as offense, they can slug it out with anyone. Their lineup is solid all around. They could do better at catcher and with the Aybar/Izturis platoon, but all things considered, their other bats more than make these two weaknesses negligible. Last year, their one weakness was power and now that is solved with Hunter and Teixeira. The Angels are actually average against lefty pitching, but at about 115% of league average against righties. Because of this, they might have more problems with the White Sox (Danks, Buehrle) than the other playoff contenders who only have one lefty dominating pitcher.
I don't know what else to tell you. The Angels have about as complete a team as anyone you will see. There have been better teams, of course, but they are might good right now. Let me know if you have any other questions.
0
Quote Originally Posted by pastafazoola:
lana know this is off tangent, but considering you check out the XERA stats, how do you figure the Angels having the success they're having? i mean every single projected win/loss ratio i see, whether XERA or RA or what have you, has the Angels with at least 10 more losses, i'm asking to see if i might use that info towards leaning for the post-season props AL playoffs, any answers from you or anyone would be greatly appreciated...
Well, I try to stay away from these prop/futures bets (might change my mind for picking playoff series winners, but doubt it) but I will try to explain this as I see it. I would say the most important key to success in baseball is pitching and the Angels have lots of this. Lackey can be as good as any one on any given day, Santana has taken it to the next level and is an elite pitcher, Saunders has been phenomenal, Weaver can light it up on any day and is a very good pitcher overall. The weak link is Garland and I know plenty of teams who wish they could say this. The bullpen could be better but is still No. 11 overall. And the Angels have the No. 8 defense, which is key as well.
As far as offense, they can slug it out with anyone. Their lineup is solid all around. They could do better at catcher and with the Aybar/Izturis platoon, but all things considered, their other bats more than make these two weaknesses negligible. Last year, their one weakness was power and now that is solved with Hunter and Teixeira. The Angels are actually average against lefty pitching, but at about 115% of league average against righties. Because of this, they might have more problems with the White Sox (Danks, Buehrle) than the other playoff contenders who only have one lefty dominating pitcher.
I don't know what else to tell you. The Angels have about as complete a team as anyone you will see. There have been better teams, of course, but they are might good right now. Let me know if you have any other questions.
** Pittsburgh +124 +4.43 UNITS ** Boston -111 +3.78 UNITS ** Milwaukee -1.5 -114 +3.86 UNITS ** Chi Sox -1.5 -110 +3.87 UNITS ** Oakland +134 +4.58 UNITS
0
5-0 +20.52 UNITS
** Pittsburgh +124 +4.43 UNITS ** Boston -111 +3.78 UNITS ** Milwaukee -1.5 -114 +3.86 UNITS ** Chi Sox -1.5 -110 +3.87 UNITS ** Oakland +134 +4.58 UNITS
Great day buddy keep it up. Good Job today.
5-0
Hot Forum Topics
