Bradley has strung 5 straight quality performances together to start the season. He sports a 1.63 era and 1.23 whip over 27.2 innings, an average of 5.5 innings per start vs quality offenses. He is the hottest item in the Twins rotation, regardless of how much respect we give Ryan. Rasmussen has also done well in his 4 starts, all against quality offenses, but the Rays have a hard time backing their starters with any offense. After 2 ugly performances at the Mets I think the Twins back Bradley today. No one loses forever and Holmes was the ideal guy to put a stop to the Mets losing streak. Yesterday the Mets put together a bullpen game that was effective. I don’t see the Rays resorting to that strategy. Let’s back Bradley and the Twins at a plus $ opportunity.
Just so sac has something else to consider here are some leanings, all with listed pitchers: Guardians, Braves, White Sox, Angels. Let’s see how many paragraphs he can contribute to that Irish Stew.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
2
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
11 -12 -2, -6.03, RoR -0.3%
JMHO – 4/24
F5 - Twins +110 - Bradley/Rasmussen
Bradley has strung 5 straight quality performances together to start the season. He sports a 1.63 era and 1.23 whip over 27.2 innings, an average of 5.5 innings per start vs quality offenses. He is the hottest item in the Twins rotation, regardless of how much respect we give Ryan. Rasmussen has also done well in his 4 starts, all against quality offenses, but the Rays have a hard time backing their starters with any offense. After 2 ugly performances at the Mets I think the Twins back Bradley today. No one loses forever and Holmes was the ideal guy to put a stop to the Mets losing streak. Yesterday the Mets put together a bullpen game that was effective. I don’t see the Rays resorting to that strategy. Let’s back Bradley and the Twins at a plus $ opportunity.
Just so sac has something else to consider here are some leanings, all with listed pitchers: Guardians, Braves, White Sox, Angels. Let’s see how many paragraphs he can contribute to that Irish Stew.
Yep. Playing positive odds we only need 50%, or even less. The bigger the favorite, the higher percentage of winners you need, Diff'rent strokes for diff'rent folks.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
1
@Jars
Yep. Playing positive odds we only need 50%, or even less. The bigger the favorite, the higher percentage of winners you need, Diff'rent strokes for diff'rent folks.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.