You’ve been correct!! Would you blindly play first 5 overs today?
@JJWoods to answer your question kind of. What I mean by that is in a game which has brown vs skubal when Brown has incredible lifetime numbers against the Tigers, especially in Detroit since he’s from Michigan, I might lay off. But on the other hand, I blindly played these anyways, and I think it’s about consistency versus picking the spots.
I never tell anyone how to manage their bankrolls so I can’t start now, but for instance a game, which has Woodruff against taillon where the ladder has been out of action for some time, I think that’s a good risk which is calculated and in your favor, despite how good woodruff is in the first half of games.
@JJWoods to answer your question kind of. What I mean by that is in a game which has brown vs skubal when Brown has incredible lifetime numbers against the Tigers, especially in Detroit since he’s from Michigan, I might lay off. But on the other hand, I blindly played these anyways, and I think it’s about consistency versus picking the spots.
I never tell anyone how to manage their bankrolls so I can’t start now, but for instance a game, which has Woodruff against taillon where the ladder has been out of action for some time, I think that’s a good risk which is calculated and in your favor, despite how good woodruff is in the first half of games.
From a purely statistical standpoint the numbers suggest that playing blind will tend towards an 85% success rate which we all know is unheard of in sports gaming, especially in MLB betting. I agree that there may be obvious situations where pitchers with extreme numbers might test the formula (Skubol just walked his first batter btw) but I'm not good enough to tweek the current formula. As you say, though, it's only a matter of time before the numbers change so treading gently is the way to go! Thanks for this though. It adds to the entertainment that should be the ultimate goal.
From a purely statistical standpoint the numbers suggest that playing blind will tend towards an 85% success rate which we all know is unheard of in sports gaming, especially in MLB betting. I agree that there may be obvious situations where pitchers with extreme numbers might test the formula (Skubol just walked his first batter btw) but I'm not good enough to tweek the current formula. As you say, though, it's only a matter of time before the numbers change so treading gently is the way to go! Thanks for this though. It adds to the entertainment that should be the ultimate goal.
@Brewmeister
Of course I love sharing information and I had suspected something when I had won twice backing the OVER 3.5 with I forget which two Seattle SP's squaring off against an opponent and both went over. I thought maybe it was Seattle or something along those but I kept seeing these short FH lines (always with Skenes it seems) going over the FH total. Then I heard that bit yesterday and...yes, another FH OVER 4 which I too was on.
I did NOT play the FH over in the Skubal/Brown game but I'm thinking I probably should for the Woodruff game upcoming :)
@Brewmeister
Of course I love sharing information and I had suspected something when I had won twice backing the OVER 3.5 with I forget which two Seattle SP's squaring off against an opponent and both went over. I thought maybe it was Seattle or something along those but I kept seeing these short FH lines (always with Skenes it seems) going over the FH total. Then I heard that bit yesterday and...yes, another FH OVER 4 which I too was on.
I did NOT play the FH over in the Skubal/Brown game but I'm thinking I probably should for the Woodruff game upcoming :)
Yep good call there and one of those opportunities to push the 85% number. Nice.
Yep good call there and one of those opportunities to push the 85% number. Nice.
Quote: Originally Posted by Brewmeister]Quote Originally Posted by LAGameofInches: Yes, it's nuts. I hope others are seeing this too Happy I skipped out on the Astros/Tigers b/c man is Houston having problems scoring runs Yep good call there and one of those opportunities to push the 85% number. Nice.[/Quote]
I'd also like BrooklynCapper to win his play which is on the UNDER[
Quote: Originally Posted by Brewmeister]Quote Originally Posted by LAGameofInches: Yes, it's nuts. I hope others are seeing this too Happy I skipped out on the Astros/Tigers b/c man is Houston having problems scoring runs Yep good call there and one of those opportunities to push the 85% number. Nice.[/Quote]
I'd also like BrooklynCapper to win his play which is on the UNDER[
Cheers on that sentiment. I hope it's a POD. Sure looks good. Haven't had a chance to visit. Heading that way...
Cheers on that sentiment. I hope it's a POD. Sure looks good. Haven't had a chance to visit. Heading that way...
I happened to bet them all tonight. Went 5-1 with just the Astros game missing according to lines I got on MGM.
May have even been better as MGM had some 4.5 lines that may have been 4 elsewhere. Yanks game being one which went over 4.5.
I happened to bet them all tonight. Went 5-1 with just the Astros game missing according to lines I got on MGM.
May have even been better as MGM had some 4.5 lines that may have been 4 elsewhere. Yanks game being one which went over 4.5.
Fuck it I’m running it back with Mis v Rea. Misorowski gotten harassed away from home. Always risk but potential for blow up inning. Only need one. Gotta trust the numbers I guess
Fuck it I’m running it back with Mis v Rea. Misorowski gotten harassed away from home. Always risk but potential for blow up inning. Only need one. Gotta trust the numbers I guess
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.