Guys my Top Automated Total is testing very well in the WNBA. There is absolutely no reason at all that the Top Automated Total will not perform well in basketball and football, this is very exciting news for me. The WNBA has gone (3-0) in my tracking and there is one more to track tonight. Dallas Under 164.5, just keep an eye on this one tonight, if your interested.
Falcon Sports Daily Double
37-19 (+26.60 units)
66.07% Winners
Breakdown
Top MLB Power Number (19-10) (+17.00 units)
Top MLB Automated Total (18-9) (+9.60 units)
Daily Double July 5 (Day 30)
Yankees Over 8.5 (-110) 2.20 units to win 2.00 units
Houston -1.5 (-110) 2.20 units to win 2.00 units
Good luck tonight guys
Falcon Sports
2
Guys my Top Automated Total is testing very well in the WNBA. There is absolutely no reason at all that the Top Automated Total will not perform well in basketball and football, this is very exciting news for me. The WNBA has gone (3-0) in my tracking and there is one more to track tonight. Dallas Under 164.5, just keep an eye on this one tonight, if your interested.
Falcon Sports Daily Double
37-19 (+26.60 units)
66.07% Winners
Breakdown
Top MLB Power Number (19-10) (+17.00 units)
Top MLB Automated Total (18-9) (+9.60 units)
Daily Double July 5 (Day 30)
Yankees Over 8.5 (-110) 2.20 units to win 2.00 units
Yes. I'm not playing it, just tracking it. I wrote down 164.5 For tracking purposes. I have this total at 157pts and in basketball I need a minimum of 5pts to have a viable play. So yes at 162.5, it's still worth it but not much lower.
Falcon Sports
1
Yes. I'm not playing it, just tracking it. I wrote down 164.5 For tracking purposes. I have this total at 157pts and in basketball I need a minimum of 5pts to have a viable play. So yes at 162.5, it's still worth it but not much lower.
Things are looking good with the WNBA Automated Total at (4-0) now. There is one showing up for tonight, if anyone is interested. I don't really want to clutter the thread with a lot of WNBA system talk. But tonight, Vegas Under 170.5 ( FanDuel) if u want to see how things progress.
Falcon Sports
0
Things are looking good with the WNBA Automated Total at (4-0) now. There is one showing up for tonight, if anyone is interested. I don't really want to clutter the thread with a lot of WNBA system talk. But tonight, Vegas Under 170.5 ( FanDuel) if u want to see how things progress.
Things are looking good with the WNBA Automated Total at (4-0) now. There is one showing up for tonight, if anyone is interested. I don't really want to clutter the thread with a lot of WNBA system talk. But tonight, Vegas Under 170.5 ( FanDuel) if u want to see how things progress. Falcon Sports
Winners are in no way clutter, I put the WNBA pick in a 3-teamer that won. Used Houston RL also more than once. Hit 8 tickets yesterday, with only one being a single gamer. I should probably take today off, will definitely go light with house money...tyvm.
Cautiously pessimistic
1
Quote Originally Posted by MITM:
Things are looking good with the WNBA Automated Total at (4-0) now. There is one showing up for tonight, if anyone is interested. I don't really want to clutter the thread with a lot of WNBA system talk. But tonight, Vegas Under 170.5 ( FanDuel) if u want to see how things progress. Falcon Sports
Winners are in no way clutter, I put the WNBA pick in a 3-teamer that won. Used Houston RL also more than once. Hit 8 tickets yesterday, with only one being a single gamer. I should probably take today off, will definitely go light with house money...tyvm.
I've got to deal with the regression. (0-2) on Wednesday.
Falcon Sports Daily Double
38-22 (+21.40 units)
63.33% Winners
Breakdown
Top MLB Power Number (20-11) (+16.40 units)
Top MLB Automated Total (18-11) (+5.00 units)
Daily Double for Thursday July 7 (Day 32)
Houston -1.5 (-155) 1.55 units to win 1.00 unit
Padres Over 6.5 (-115) 1.15 units to win 1.00 unit
I'm going back to the exact Day 1 setup for this thread. The overall numbers still look great. I think it's ok to flat bet the selections but I actually like the (1-2-4) unit progression better. So call it personal preference.
Let's see if we can slow the regression and get back to stacking some units.
Good luck guys
Falcon Sports
1
I've got to deal with the regression. (0-2) on Wednesday.
Falcon Sports Daily Double
38-22 (+21.40 units)
63.33% Winners
Breakdown
Top MLB Power Number (20-11) (+16.40 units)
Top MLB Automated Total (18-11) (+5.00 units)
Daily Double for Thursday July 7 (Day 32)
Houston -1.5 (-155) 1.55 units to win 1.00 unit
Padres Over 6.5 (-115) 1.15 units to win 1.00 unit
I'm going back to the exact Day 1 setup for this thread. The overall numbers still look great. I think it's ok to flat bet the selections but I actually like the (1-2-4) unit progression better. So call it personal preference.
Let's see if we can slow the regression and get back to stacking some units.
I am curious about your “models” for MLB that allegedly took a lifetime to develop according to your past posts that looks purely at statistical information and requires no knowledge of the teams selected (ie., contenders or pretenders, win/loss streaks, starting pitcher matchups etc.) or baseball for that matter. In other words, it sounds like you have developed your own “system” plays but from what I can tell tracking your posts the past few weeks, your model needs some serious tweaking as your picks have been hitting less than 50% which isn’t too impressive especially when only picking two plays.
That said, thank your for your insights and I hope you can tweak your “models” to consistently hit the 70% win rate you’ve been pumping here at Covers.
1
@ MITM
I am curious about your “models” for MLB that allegedly took a lifetime to develop according to your past posts that looks purely at statistical information and requires no knowledge of the teams selected (ie., contenders or pretenders, win/loss streaks, starting pitcher matchups etc.) or baseball for that matter. In other words, it sounds like you have developed your own “system” plays but from what I can tell tracking your posts the past few weeks, your model needs some serious tweaking as your picks have been hitting less than 50% which isn’t too impressive especially when only picking two plays.
That said, thank your for your insights and I hope you can tweak your “models” to consistently hit the 70% win rate you’ve been pumping here at Covers.
There is nothing or no one that can hit even 60% over the long run. If u think differently, u are mistaken. If a year from now, we were hitting 57%, I would be wildly successful. Again if u think differently, u are mistaken.
Best of luck to you
Falcon Sports
1
There is nothing or no one that can hit even 60% over the long run. If u think differently, u are mistaken. If a year from now, we were hitting 57%, I would be wildly successful. Again if u think differently, u are mistaken.
I agree 100%. If one is consistently winning 60%-65% of your bets, then you should be considered a professional gambler which I have never held myself out as one but you and your “Falcon Sports” group ostensibly do. That said, I recall your various posts pumping how your model is consistently hitting nearly 70%, but from the point I have been checking your action - about 2 weeks now - your model has been hitting less than 50%. Now you appear to be back peddling from your earlier declaration and now saying that if your model hits 50% then it’s a success. Well sorry to inform you but if hitting 50% is good in your eyes, then you and your “Falcon Sports” group are not professional gamblers but rather amateurs like 90% of the people here on Covers. I have been a member here at Covers since 2007 and seen many “models” and “pros” who disappear after a year once they realize they are no good at capping. Let’s see where you and your “model” is at a year from now.
1
@MITM
I agree 100%. If one is consistently winning 60%-65% of your bets, then you should be considered a professional gambler which I have never held myself out as one but you and your “Falcon Sports” group ostensibly do. That said, I recall your various posts pumping how your model is consistently hitting nearly 70%, but from the point I have been checking your action - about 2 weeks now - your model has been hitting less than 50%. Now you appear to be back peddling from your earlier declaration and now saying that if your model hits 50% then it’s a success. Well sorry to inform you but if hitting 50% is good in your eyes, then you and your “Falcon Sports” group are not professional gamblers but rather amateurs like 90% of the people here on Covers. I have been a member here at Covers since 2007 and seen many “models” and “pros” who disappear after a year once they realize they are no good at capping. Let’s see where you and your “model” is at a year from now.
@MITM I agree 100%. If one is consistently winning 60%-65% of your bets, then you should be considered a professional gambler which I have never held myself out as one but you and your “Falcon Sports” group ostensibly do. That said, I recall your various posts pumping how your model is consistently hitting nearly 70%, but from the point I have been checking your action - about 2 weeks now - your model has been hitting less than 50%. Now you appear to be back peddling from your earlier declaration and now saying that if your model hits 50% then it’s a success. Well sorry to inform you but if hitting 50% is good in your eyes, then you and your “Falcon Sports” group are not professional gamblers but rather amateurs like 90% of the people here on Covers. I have been a member here at Covers since 2007 and seen many “models” and “pros” who disappear after a year once they realize they are no good at capping. Let’s see where you and your “model” is at a year from now.
This is clueless, he has never "pumped" 70%, but has showed his record of posted picks. Sorry you started 2 weeks ago, he's still at 63%. Plus, he never stated a 50% rate would be a success...
Cautiously pessimistic
1
Quote Originally Posted by 2BuKu:
@MITM I agree 100%. If one is consistently winning 60%-65% of your bets, then you should be considered a professional gambler which I have never held myself out as one but you and your “Falcon Sports” group ostensibly do. That said, I recall your various posts pumping how your model is consistently hitting nearly 70%, but from the point I have been checking your action - about 2 weeks now - your model has been hitting less than 50%. Now you appear to be back peddling from your earlier declaration and now saying that if your model hits 50% then it’s a success. Well sorry to inform you but if hitting 50% is good in your eyes, then you and your “Falcon Sports” group are not professional gamblers but rather amateurs like 90% of the people here on Covers. I have been a member here at Covers since 2007 and seen many “models” and “pros” who disappear after a year once they realize they are no good at capping. Let’s see where you and your “model” is at a year from now.
This is clueless, he has never "pumped" 70%, but has showed his record of posted picks. Sorry you started 2 weeks ago, he's still at 63%. Plus, he never stated a 50% rate would be a success...
@MITM I agree 100%. If one is consistently winning 60%-65% of your bets, then you should be considered a professional gambler which I have never held myself out as one but you and your “Falcon Sports” group ostensibly do. That said, I recall your various posts pumping how your model is consistently hitting nearly 70%, but from the point I have been checking your action - about 2 weeks now - your model has been hitting less than 50%. Now you appear to be back peddling from your earlier declaration and now saying that if your model hits 50% then it’s a success. Well sorry to inform you but if hitting 50% is good in your eyes, then you and your “Falcon Sports” group are not professional gamblers but rather amateurs like 90% of the people here on Covers. I have been a member here at Covers since 2007 and seen many “models” and “pros” who disappear after a year once they realize they are no good at capping. Let’s see where you and your “model” is at a year from now.
I’m new to this bread but MlTM posts his overall W/L record as well as units won, so I’m confused as to why you’re basing your comment on only the last two weeks. Sure, maybe the last couple of weeks hasn’t been stellar but doesn’t everyone go thru ebbs and flows? Seems to me his overall record speaks for itself.
And as with following anyone, people should do their own due diligence and not follow blindly before spending any cash.
2
Quote Originally Posted by 2BuKu:
@MITM I agree 100%. If one is consistently winning 60%-65% of your bets, then you should be considered a professional gambler which I have never held myself out as one but you and your “Falcon Sports” group ostensibly do. That said, I recall your various posts pumping how your model is consistently hitting nearly 70%, but from the point I have been checking your action - about 2 weeks now - your model has been hitting less than 50%. Now you appear to be back peddling from your earlier declaration and now saying that if your model hits 50% then it’s a success. Well sorry to inform you but if hitting 50% is good in your eyes, then you and your “Falcon Sports” group are not professional gamblers but rather amateurs like 90% of the people here on Covers. I have been a member here at Covers since 2007 and seen many “models” and “pros” who disappear after a year once they realize they are no good at capping. Let’s see where you and your “model” is at a year from now.
I’m new to this bread but MlTM posts his overall W/L record as well as units won, so I’m confused as to why you’re basing your comment on only the last two weeks. Sure, maybe the last couple of weeks hasn’t been stellar but doesn’t everyone go thru ebbs and flows? Seems to me his overall record speaks for itself.
And as with following anyone, people should do their own due diligence and not follow blindly before spending any cash.
All I'm going to say is this. Professionals in this business win at around 56% max. This isn't up for debate. I've been in this business since August 1986 and I've done everything in this business. I've been a teenage novice, I've been a bookie but my passion lies in research and development and that's what I currently do.
I will say this.
I hope my Top Automated Total is successful. I altered my equation today, to increase the importance of pitching.
But let me tell you about the Top Power Number. Since April 15th, the Top MLB Power Number is running (58-26) over 69% Winners. It has not had a three game losing streak yet. The Top NHL Power Number did incredible also, so I have very high hopes for it.
Good luck today guys
Falcon Sports
2
Falcon Sports Daily Double
39-23 (+21.25 units)
62.90% Winners
Breakdown
Top MLB Power Number (21-11) (+17.40 units)
Top MLB Automated Total (18-12) (+3.85 units)
Daily Double for Friday July 8 (Day 33)
KC Over 8.5 (-120) 2.40 units to win 2.00 units
Houston -1.5 (-110) 1.10 units to win 1.00 unit
All I'm going to say is this. Professionals in this business win at around 56% max. This isn't up for debate. I've been in this business since August 1986 and I've done everything in this business. I've been a teenage novice, I've been a bookie but my passion lies in research and development and that's what I currently do.
I will say this.
I hope my Top Automated Total is successful. I altered my equation today, to increase the importance of pitching.
But let me tell you about the Top Power Number. Since April 15th, the Top MLB Power Number is running (58-26) over 69% Winners. It has not had a three game losing streak yet. The Top NHL Power Number did incredible also, so I have very high hopes for it.
I will add this and perhaps I did say this. If u are playing in a (1-2-4) unit progression, you will do very well by simply alternating wins and losses.
I know a lot of guys new to this business have way too high of expectations. If u ever find a system or model that can even maintain a 57% win percentage, you would have struck gold. U would never have to work again, that much I can guarantee. I'm talking over the long run, not a small sample size.
I have a great record in this thread. Winning over 62% but guys that's only over 62 plays and that's a very small sample size.
Falcon Sports
1
I will add this and perhaps I did say this. If u are playing in a (1-2-4) unit progression, you will do very well by simply alternating wins and losses.
I know a lot of guys new to this business have way too high of expectations. If u ever find a system or model that can even maintain a 57% win percentage, you would have struck gold. U would never have to work again, that much I can guarantee. I'm talking over the long run, not a small sample size.
I have a great record in this thread. Winning over 62% but guys that's only over 62 plays and that's a very small sample size.
Thanks for the explanation but IMO it’s unnecessary as most people know that a winning percentage around 60 is incredibly good and sustaining 70% is not feasible. One only has to read your thread from the beginning to verify your numbers. We’re all adults(I hope) and should be able to make an educated decision to follow you or not, depending on what we see.
Keep up the good work and transparency, it’s appreciated.
Now let’s win some bets!
1
Thanks for the explanation but IMO it’s unnecessary as most people know that a winning percentage around 60 is incredibly good and sustaining 70% is not feasible. One only has to read your thread from the beginning to verify your numbers. We’re all adults(I hope) and should be able to make an educated decision to follow you or not, depending on what we see.
Keep up the good work and transparency, it’s appreciated.
Hot Forum Topics
