I’m on the halos there not officially a play yet but close to it but I’m on them Check back 2 hours see how line has moved Bol everyone
Halos came through yesterday and if the coach wouldve pulled out Anderson out after 10 pitches or less halos might have been a play today but with that being said im riding the train till they lose Bol everyone
Halos came through yesterday and if the coach wouldve pulled out Anderson out after 10 pitches or less halos might have been a play today but with that being said im riding the train till they lose Bol everyone
As a side note, the Professor did mention a secondary Scoring Drought play, though it doesn't generate many plays so he rated it a bit riskier and he doesn't call them out in his picks videos. That one calls for playing any home team that's lost 4 straight (location doesn't matter), scoring 2 or fewer runs in all 4 losses, and only if the line is greater than 1.5 decimal / -200 American. He doesn't mention that one in his picks videos but I've been tracking it. It's currently 2-1 on the season - SD on 4/29 (W 7-4), TEX on 5/4 (W 8-1), and ATH on 5/19 (L 3-4). The Angels are a play today in that system.
As a side note, the Professor did mention a secondary Scoring Drought play, though it doesn't generate many plays so he rated it a bit riskier and he doesn't call them out in his picks videos. That one calls for playing any home team that's lost 4 straight (location doesn't matter), scoring 2 or fewer runs in all 4 losses, and only if the line is greater than 1.5 decimal / -200 American. He doesn't mention that one in his picks videos but I've been tracking it. It's currently 2-1 on the season - SD on 4/29 (W 7-4), TEX on 5/4 (W 8-1), and ATH on 5/19 (L 3-4). The Angels are a play today in that system.
Seatle a big L not sure what record is now but if anyone knows please post it and close plays that are under +150 between +135 to +145 from the games I’ve seem are 5-0 there may have been more that I may have missed I will continue to look for the close plays and keep track still 4 months of baseball left Milwaukee was a close play today
Seatle a big L not sure what record is now but if anyone knows please post it and close plays that are under +150 between +135 to +145 from the games I’ve seem are 5-0 there may have been more that I may have missed I will continue to look for the close plays and keep track still 4 months of baseball left Milwaukee was a close play today
The official record of the system is 16-3 after yesterday's loss with a 22% ROI. Unofficially, playing the run line on those heavy favorites has gone 12-7 with a 24% ROI on the season, and the "extra" 4-game scoring drought has gone 2-2 with a -1% ROI.
The official record of the system is 16-3 after yesterday's loss with a 22% ROI. Unofficially, playing the run line on those heavy favorites has gone 12-7 with a 24% ROI on the season, and the "extra" 4-game scoring drought has gone 2-2 with a -1% ROI.
4-0 if you took +1.5 on the RL.
Not sure how it did last year of course.
4-0 if you took +1.5 on the RL.
Not sure how it did last year of course.
@kidd22
I don’t believe Seattle was a play on 5/28 as Washington’s first loss of their previous two losses leading up to the Seattle game, was at home (against the Giants).
AS
@kidd22
I don’t believe Seattle was a play on 5/28 as Washington’s first loss of their previous two losses leading up to the Seattle game, was at home (against the Giants).
AS
Doesn't matter where the losses were played 2 losswa and 2 runs or less on the road with a line +150 or more fade it. It is professor MJ system and he literally made a video on it
Doesn't matter where the losses were played 2 losswa and 2 runs or less on the road with a line +150 or more fade it. It is professor MJ system and he literally made a video on it
@VicVega91
Balt was -169 when I wrote that last night, so as long as you aren't using a book that has a 20 cent or higher straddle, +150 would have been gettable
@VicVega91
Balt was -169 when I wrote that last night, so as long as you aren't using a book that has a 20 cent or higher straddle, +150 would have been gettable
@KarmaStateU2024
I appreciate the reply. Whatever the favorites line is irrelevant. I am just curious as to what book it was where you saw the White Sox at +150 or higher. All of my books showed +145 to +149. Like I said, just curious what book you saw that at. Thanks
@KarmaStateU2024
I appreciate the reply. Whatever the favorites line is irrelevant. I am just curious as to what book it was where you saw the White Sox at +150 or higher. All of my books showed +145 to +149. Like I said, just curious what book you saw that at. Thanks
@VicVega91
Was that the closing line ? Those numbers I like if it was +145 +149 from what I have kept track of are 6-0 now but I over slept didn’t see closing line so I can’t say for sure If anyone knows please post closing line
@VicVega91
Was that the closing line ? Those numbers I like if it was +145 +149 from what I have kept track of are 6-0 now but I over slept didn’t see closing line so I can’t say for sure If anyone knows please post closing line
@lopez021130
Ya I hear you like today if balty was -180 or higher I would not have played just cause They suck if a good team and good pitching I’ll play But also the plays +135 +148 other side that I’ve kept track of the favorites have won
@lopez021130
Ya I hear you like today if balty was -180 or higher I would not have played just cause They suck if a good team and good pitching I’ll play But also the plays +135 +148 other side that I’ve kept track of the favorites have won
@kidd22
I believe those were the lines about 30 minutes before 1st pitch. I played Baltimore regardless of it not being a system play (at least in my mind). Average line for me was roughly Baltimore -161
@kidd22
I believe those were the lines about 30 minutes before 1st pitch. I played Baltimore regardless of it not being a system play (at least in my mind). Average line for me was roughly Baltimore -161
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.