All Forums | MLB Betting Forum

7/16 - MLB Breakdown Sheets

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 5558
Posts: 47
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 33105
Posted: #26
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 34704
Posted: #27
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 10499
Posted: #28
Thanks man, BOL
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 678
Posted: #29
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 46247
Posted: #30
gl 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 1504
Posted: #31
Is there an error on the WAS@MIA game? WAS won yesterday so their streak should be W1?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 1120
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by si1ly:


Locked in:

7:10 EST - Cleveland Indians (+125)

seems like a good deal

most books opened at that number
pinnacle came out early with +136 and it got bet down ever since... currently sitting at +112
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 4583
Posted: #33
 bol
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 1346
Posted: #34
Let's get this!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2012
Posts: 434
Posted: #35
im tailing you with Cleveland.  got good value
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 12061
Posted: #36
Houston is starting to look good at +110.  People seem to forget that Kip Wells hasn't been able to hold a spot in the rotation on any team.  I think he's seen 7 different organizations in his career.  Maybe more.  I know they've been an auto-fade on the road, but my numbers are telling me they have a better than 50-50 shot to take game one in San Diego.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 4929
Posted: #37

Cleveland

Good to see we are on the same page

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 24197
Posted: #38
I would rather lay little juice with MIL then hope a team that's 1-10 in July gets lucky.
There is no 100% cappers in the world
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 12061
Posted: #39
Quote Originally Posted by KingScorpio:

I would rather lay little juice with MIL then hope a team that's 1-10 in July gets lucky.

I know.  That's the only thing that's kept me from pulling the trigger.  They're playing horrible ball.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 618
Posted: #40
si1ly:  As I previously indicated, based on your numbers, Houston, Washington and Baltimore are good plays.  Would you mid sharing why you posted Cleveland so early and why you liked them over the other teams I mentioned?  BOL
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 12061
Posted: #41
Quote Originally Posted by js4u:

si1ly:  As I previously indicated, based on your numbers, Houston, Washington and Baltimore are good plays.  Would you mid sharing why you posted Cleveland so early and why you liked them over the other teams I mentioned?  BOL

Houston is toxic and I expected that line to move in my favor so they were worth waiting on.  Washington looks pretty good, but I didn't think that line would go too far so I wanted to do more research.  There's not a lot of data on Baltimore's pitcher so the projection on that game isn't very accurate so I'm not paying attention to it.  I jumped on Cleveland early because I expected the line to move away from me - and it did.  The rest of the games I didn't have to worry about that so waiting to gather more information was only going to help my cause.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 618
Posted: #42
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 10503
Posted: #43
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 618
Posted: #44

si1ly:  It appears based on your numbers the Minnesota UNDER is just as strong, if not stronger, as the Milwaukee UNDER you previously mentioned in this thread. Thoughts?  I agree with your evaluation regarding Baltimore.  It's hard to back a starter who has only thrown 8 innings this season.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 618
Posted: #45
si1ly:  The Mliwaukee O/U line has moved to 9 which should make the under you mentioned more valuable?
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 33526
Posted: #46
Si1ly bol tonight... thanks for input..
 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 36843
Posted: #47
All Forums | MLB Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.