When I sit down at the table to cap my games there are papers spread out everywhere, and my computer screen (65" Sanyo TV I use as my monitor) I have 11 tabs open with different stats. First, I begin with my Series RPG Worksheet (ie, assessing offenses!) and this separate process is *KEY* to my capping, unlike my assessment of pitching (which I do only with each daily game because they change) - especially because offense DOES NOT rely on the performance of JUST ONE MAN....and good offenses can often overcome a bad performance from their starter....whereas even a GOOD starter having a GOOD day still relies on run support to win.
Offense is the KEY in my capping...NOT pitching. Although obviously starter + BP is VERY important!!
Once I finish my pre-series RPG Worksheet for all games, then I get down to capping that day's games.
After capping them all I have "circled" multiple teams/odds and totals based on my projections (ie, potential/probable bets!) But the effort isn't over as I prefer to confirm the lineups, assess the updated weather forecasts, and watch closely for injury or "resting player" updates as we approach gametimes...
Then, from all those "circled" potential bets I make my actual bets and post most of them (I usually keep my parlays and props to myself)
All this is pointed out for a reason, which may or may not apply to YOUR capping as well: "Wouldas" "Wouldas" are circled picks that I seriously considered for bet but for one reason or another didn't bet. Now looking back at my capping sheets, I can assess the results of all those games I liked and I "woulda" bet but didn't. ie. "I Woulda Won that" (WW) or "I Woulda Lost that" (WL) had I actually bet them.
Results of my "Wouldas" since May 01 to date:
49 - 25 SIDES 66% (about 60% were plus $$$; only a handful of RL; only 4 of the 25 losses woulda been large favs )
45 - 41 Unders (theoretical loss on juice)
26 - 8 OVERS! 76% hit rate on the overs I passed up!
Conclusion: I'm going to incorporate/bet more of my "Woulda" (sides) and "Woulda" (overs)
1
. I Woulda . . .
When I sit down at the table to cap my games there are papers spread out everywhere, and my computer screen (65" Sanyo TV I use as my monitor) I have 11 tabs open with different stats. First, I begin with my Series RPG Worksheet (ie, assessing offenses!) and this separate process is *KEY* to my capping, unlike my assessment of pitching (which I do only with each daily game because they change) - especially because offense DOES NOT rely on the performance of JUST ONE MAN....and good offenses can often overcome a bad performance from their starter....whereas even a GOOD starter having a GOOD day still relies on run support to win.
Offense is the KEY in my capping...NOT pitching. Although obviously starter + BP is VERY important!!
Once I finish my pre-series RPG Worksheet for all games, then I get down to capping that day's games.
After capping them all I have "circled" multiple teams/odds and totals based on my projections (ie, potential/probable bets!) But the effort isn't over as I prefer to confirm the lineups, assess the updated weather forecasts, and watch closely for injury or "resting player" updates as we approach gametimes...
Then, from all those "circled" potential bets I make my actual bets and post most of them (I usually keep my parlays and props to myself)
All this is pointed out for a reason, which may or may not apply to YOUR capping as well: "Wouldas" "Wouldas" are circled picks that I seriously considered for bet but for one reason or another didn't bet. Now looking back at my capping sheets, I can assess the results of all those games I liked and I "woulda" bet but didn't. ie. "I Woulda Won that" (WW) or "I Woulda Lost that" (WL) had I actually bet them.
Results of my "Wouldas" since May 01 to date:
49 - 25 SIDES 66% (about 60% were plus $$$; only a handful of RL; only 4 of the 25 losses woulda been large favs )
45 - 41 Unders (theoretical loss on juice)
26 - 8 OVERS! 76% hit rate on the overs I passed up!
Conclusion: I'm going to incorporate/bet more of my "Woulda" (sides) and "Woulda" (overs)
Although excellent SP Schlittler is on the mound for NYY tonight, coming off a bad outing (normally great for a rebound performance!) and supported by a fine BP the most integral part of the Yankee team, their offense, has SUCKED....on an extended weakss/SLUMP thru their recent 5 complete series - tracing back to June 19! Just 46 runs over 16 games. WEAKASS 2.88 rpg - and 3 of those series were at Yankee Stadium!
Tampa owns the BEST HOME RECORD and are pretty solid at run-scoring!
So, in a game of Jekyll & Hyde, which Yankee offense will show up tonight to face the #3 best team in MLB??
The former HOT bats of NYY from first half of June?? Or the current weakass version, but which may be overdue to breakout of their slump at some point soon, possibly tonight(?!).....or not.
Then too, whichever NYY offense decides to show up does face a fairly good starter in JAX.
Grrrr .......too close to call because silly-ass *GUESSING* about NYY offense is required and I won't do that. Guessing = bad idea!
Coin-flipper is probable anyway so I pass.
2
Although excellent SP Schlittler is on the mound for NYY tonight, coming off a bad outing (normally great for a rebound performance!) and supported by a fine BP the most integral part of the Yankee team, their offense, has SUCKED....on an extended weakss/SLUMP thru their recent 5 complete series - tracing back to June 19! Just 46 runs over 16 games. WEAKASS 2.88 rpg - and 3 of those series were at Yankee Stadium!
Tampa owns the BEST HOME RECORD and are pretty solid at run-scoring!
So, in a game of Jekyll & Hyde, which Yankee offense will show up tonight to face the #3 best team in MLB??
The former HOT bats of NYY from first half of June?? Or the current weakass version, but which may be overdue to breakout of their slump at some point soon, possibly tonight(?!).....or not.
Then too, whichever NYY offense decides to show up does face a fairly good starter in JAX.
Grrrr .......too close to call because silly-ass *GUESSING* about NYY offense is required and I won't do that. Guessing = bad idea!
. I Woulda . . . When I sit down at the table to cap my games there are papers spread out everywhere, and my computer screen (65" Sanyo TV I use as my monitor) I have 11 tabs open with different stats.First, I begin with my Series RPG Worksheet (ie, assessing offenses!) and this separate process is *KEY* to my capping, unlike my assessment of pitching (which I do only with each daily game because they change) - especially because offense DOES NOT rely on the performance of JUST ONE MAN....and good offenses can often overcome a bad performance from their starter....whereas even a GOOD starter having a GOOD day still relies on run support to win. Offense is the KEY in my capping...NOT pitching. Although obviously starter + BP is VERY important!! Once I finish my pre-series RPG Worksheet for all games, then I get down to capping that day's games. After capping them all I have "circled" multiple teams/odds and totals based on my projections (ie, potential/probable bets!) But the effort isn't over as I prefer to confirm the lineups, assess the updated weather forecasts, and watch closely for injury or "resting player" updates as we approach gametimes... Then, from all those "circled" potential bets I make my actual bets and post most of them (I usually keep my parlays and props to myself) All this is pointed out for a reason, which may or may not apply to YOUR capping as well: "Wouldas""Wouldas" are circled picks that I seriously considered for bet but for one reason or another didn't bet. Now looking back at my capping sheets, I can assess the results of all those games I liked and I "woulda" bet but didn't. ie. "I Woulda Won that" (WW) or "I Woulda Lost that" (WL) had I actually bet them. Results of my "Wouldas" since May 01 to date: 49 - 25 SIDES 66% (about 60% were plus $$$; only a handful of RL; only 4 of the 25 losses woulda been large favs ) 45 - 41 Unders (theoretical loss on juice) 26 - 8 OVERS! 76% hit rate on the overs I passed up! Conclusion: I'm going to incorporate/bet more of my "Woulda" (sides) and "Woulda" (overs)
Damn do you have any time left over to enjoy life and see the sun outside?
Baseball capping is so time consuming, thats why after 46 years of doing this, i decided this year() to not spend my summer capping baseball andf instead just play the over umps, to grind out a couple of units each week. Am running out of summers lmfaoooooooooooooooooo
Good Luck Friend and please take some time for other fun things, before you know it you will be making the same post i just made
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
. I Woulda . . . When I sit down at the table to cap my games there are papers spread out everywhere, and my computer screen (65" Sanyo TV I use as my monitor) I have 11 tabs open with different stats.First, I begin with my Series RPG Worksheet (ie, assessing offenses!) and this separate process is *KEY* to my capping, unlike my assessment of pitching (which I do only with each daily game because they change) - especially because offense DOES NOT rely on the performance of JUST ONE MAN....and good offenses can often overcome a bad performance from their starter....whereas even a GOOD starter having a GOOD day still relies on run support to win. Offense is the KEY in my capping...NOT pitching. Although obviously starter + BP is VERY important!! Once I finish my pre-series RPG Worksheet for all games, then I get down to capping that day's games. After capping them all I have "circled" multiple teams/odds and totals based on my projections (ie, potential/probable bets!) But the effort isn't over as I prefer to confirm the lineups, assess the updated weather forecasts, and watch closely for injury or "resting player" updates as we approach gametimes... Then, from all those "circled" potential bets I make my actual bets and post most of them (I usually keep my parlays and props to myself) All this is pointed out for a reason, which may or may not apply to YOUR capping as well: "Wouldas""Wouldas" are circled picks that I seriously considered for bet but for one reason or another didn't bet. Now looking back at my capping sheets, I can assess the results of all those games I liked and I "woulda" bet but didn't. ie. "I Woulda Won that" (WW) or "I Woulda Lost that" (WL) had I actually bet them. Results of my "Wouldas" since May 01 to date: 49 - 25 SIDES 66% (about 60% were plus $$$; only a handful of RL; only 4 of the 25 losses woulda been large favs ) 45 - 41 Unders (theoretical loss on juice) 26 - 8 OVERS! 76% hit rate on the overs I passed up! Conclusion: I'm going to incorporate/bet more of my "Woulda" (sides) and "Woulda" (overs)
Damn do you have any time left over to enjoy life and see the sun outside?
Baseball capping is so time consuming, thats why after 46 years of doing this, i decided this year() to not spend my summer capping baseball andf instead just play the over umps, to grind out a couple of units each week. Am running out of summers lmfaoooooooooooooooooo
Good Luck Friend and please take some time for other fun things, before you know it you will be making the same post i just made
lad over 9.5 12-5 over ump These are the only umpire plays i make. I use the totals because i get both teams involved in going for the winning play. If i just play a umpire that is bias to home teams, i need that home team being able to win the game. Thats why i just like the totals.
heres the other ones for tinight
san diego 12-5 home ump bias and toronto 10-3 road ump bias
Good luck
0
umpire bias plays for tonight are
tampa over 7.5 12-5 over ump
lad over 9.5 12-5 over ump These are the only umpire plays i make. I use the totals because i get both teams involved in going for the winning play. If i just play a umpire that is bias to home teams, i need that home team being able to win the game. Thats why i just like the totals.
heres the other ones for tinight
san diego 12-5 home ump bias and toronto 10-3 road ump bias
Dude listen up this is a good bud of mine! Don't be asking shit ok If your into betting shutup and learn and be thankful your even in this space trust- me
Other then that have a good day
Mr Evil.
0
@Jayznation01
Dude listen up this is a good bud of mine! Don't be asking shit ok If your into betting shutup and learn and be thankful your even in this space trust- me
Quote Originally Posted by cd329: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: . I Woulda . . . 26 - 8 OVERS! 76% hit rate on the overs I passed up! Conclusion: I'm going to incorporate/bet more of my "Woulda" (sides) and "Woulda" (overs) Damn do you have any time left over to enjoy life and see the sun outside? Nope. " Gazing from my window, to the streets below... "
we cant replace time
p.s. post those totals
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by cd329: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: . I Woulda . . . 26 - 8 OVERS! 76% hit rate on the overs I passed up! Conclusion: I'm going to incorporate/bet more of my "Woulda" (sides) and "Woulda" (overs) Damn do you have any time left over to enjoy life and see the sun outside? Nope. " Gazing from my window, to the streets below... "
My capping shows BREWERS with a +0.6 run edge....and on low odds, this would normally be a bet BUT the intangible here is SP DUSTIN MAY.....the dude struggled his last 2 outings "bigly".....albeit both on the road and his numbers are better at home.....Still, on June 20 he held and deserved a very decent WHIP stat then hit those two bummers. Now his WHIP is only mediocre. But I have to wonder if he will rebound, like so many do after bad outings. Uncertainty and no real probability for accurate prediction. His last HOME start was a full 9.0 innings and zero ER in a 3 - 0 win over the Padres!
I pass.
But for reference, consider the Brewers as a "Woulda bet" (LEAN) but not a recommendation/pick/bet.
1
My capping shows BREWERS with a +0.6 run edge....and on low odds, this would normally be a bet BUT the intangible here is SP DUSTIN MAY.....the dude struggled his last 2 outings "bigly".....albeit both on the road and his numbers are better at home.....Still, on June 20 he held and deserved a very decent WHIP stat then hit those two bummers. Now his WHIP is only mediocre. But I have to wonder if he will rebound, like so many do after bad outings. Uncertainty and no real probability for accurate prediction. His last HOME start was a full 9.0 innings and zero ER in a 3 - 0 win over the Padres!
I pass.
But for reference, consider the Brewers as a "Woulda bet" (LEAN) but not a recommendation/pick/bet.
lad over 9.5 12-5 over ump These are the only umpire plays i make. I use the totals because i get both teams involved in going for the winning play. If i just play a umpire that is bias to home teams, i need that home team being able to win the game. Thats why i just like the totals.
heres the other ones for tinight:
san diego 12-5 home ump bias
and toronto 10-3 road ump bias
Good luck
0
Quote Originally Posted by cd329:
umpire bias plays for tonight are
tampa over 7.5 12-5 over ump
lad over 9.5 12-5 over ump These are the only umpire plays i make. I use the totals because i get both teams involved in going for the winning play. If i just play a umpire that is bias to home teams, i need that home team being able to win the game. Thats why i just like the totals.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by cd329: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: . I Woulda . . . 26 - 8 OVERS! 76% hit rate on the overs I passed up! Conclusion: I'm going to incorporate/bet more of my "Woulda" (sides) and "Woulda" (overs) Damn do you have any time left over to enjoy life and see the sun outside? Nope. " Gazing from my window, to the streets below... " we cant replace time
p.s. post those totals
Will do if there are any worthy....so far, no, but haven't started the 3 late games yet.
1
Quote Originally Posted by cd329:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by cd329: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: . I Woulda . . . 26 - 8 OVERS! 76% hit rate on the overs I passed up! Conclusion: I'm going to incorporate/bet more of my "Woulda" (sides) and "Woulda" (overs) Damn do you have any time left over to enjoy life and see the sun outside? Nope. " Gazing from my window, to the streets below... " we cant replace time
p.s. post those totals
Will do if there are any worthy....so far, no, but haven't started the 3 late games yet.
Although excellent SP Schlittler is on the mound for NYY tonight, coming off a bad outing (normally great for a rebound performance!) and supported by a fine BP the most integral part of the Yankee team, their offense, has SUCKED....on an extended weakss/SLUMP thru their recent 5 complete series - tracing back to June 19! Just 46 runs over 16 games. WEAKASS 2.88 rpg - and 3 of those series were at Yankee Stadium!
Tampa owns the BEST HOME RECORD and are pretty solid at run-scoring!
So, in a game of Jekyll & Hyde, which Yankee offense will show up tonight to face the #3 best team in MLB??
The former HOT bats of NYY from first half of June?? Or the current weakass version, but which may be overdue to breakout of their slump at some point soon, possibly tonight(?!).....or not.
Then too, whichever NYY offense decides to show up does face a fairly good starter in JAX.
Grrrr .......too close to call because silly-ass *GUESSING* about NYY offense is required and I won't do that. Guessing = bad idea!
Coin-flipper is probable anyway so I pass.
Though the fortunate Yankees will win tonight with 5 runs, make no mistake, their skills at the plate STILL SUCK!! They were fanned a whopping 17 times by Rays pitching! (JAX had a VERY GOOD performance!) and NYY only reached base 5 times in the whole game!
Disregard the score. Their offense did NOTHING to suggest they turned the corner.
2
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Although excellent SP Schlittler is on the mound for NYY tonight, coming off a bad outing (normally great for a rebound performance!) and supported by a fine BP the most integral part of the Yankee team, their offense, has SUCKED....on an extended weakss/SLUMP thru their recent 5 complete series - tracing back to June 19! Just 46 runs over 16 games. WEAKASS 2.88 rpg - and 3 of those series were at Yankee Stadium!
Tampa owns the BEST HOME RECORD and are pretty solid at run-scoring!
So, in a game of Jekyll & Hyde, which Yankee offense will show up tonight to face the #3 best team in MLB??
The former HOT bats of NYY from first half of June?? Or the current weakass version, but which may be overdue to breakout of their slump at some point soon, possibly tonight(?!).....or not.
Then too, whichever NYY offense decides to show up does face a fairly good starter in JAX.
Grrrr .......too close to call because silly-ass *GUESSING* about NYY offense is required and I won't do that. Guessing = bad idea!
Coin-flipper is probable anyway so I pass.
Though the fortunate Yankees will win tonight with 5 runs, make no mistake, their skills at the plate STILL SUCK!! They were fanned a whopping 17 times by Rays pitching! (JAX had a VERY GOOD performance!) and NYY only reached base 5 times in the whole game!
Disregard the score. Their offense did NOTHING to suggest they turned the corner.
BRAVES -121 @pinn *BB ...should be a +1.0 run edge, but recently my logical bets are failures!
Braves lead 3 - 2 in night.....Mets down to their last out....SOTO at the plate.....open base to put the slugger.....NOPE!!! Toss it right down the middle of the plate and .... 3 run homer
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
BRAVES -121 @pinn *BB ...should be a +1.0 run edge, but recently my logical bets are failures!
Braves lead 3 - 2 in night.....Mets down to their last out....SOTO at the plate.....open base to put the slugger.....NOPE!!! Toss it right down the middle of the plate and .... 3 run homer
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.