Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by Augie11: @fubah2 Has Philly announced starter yet? Yes. Rangel. Decent. Slightly better than avg imho. Not in the class of his counterpart BURNS but decent. Phillies however DO have about a full run edge at the plate over Cinci...
Looks like a potential coin-flipper to me...
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by Augie11: @fubah2 Has Philly announced starter yet? Yes. Rangel. Decent. Slightly better than avg imho. Not in the class of his counterpart BURNS but decent. Phillies however DO have about a full run edge at the plate over Cinci...
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by Augie11: @fubah2 Has Philly announced starter yet? Yes. Rangel. Decent. Slightly better than avg imho. Not in the class of his counterpart BURNS but decent. Phillies however DO have about a full run edge at the plate over Cinci... Looks like a potential coin-flipper to me...
With GOOD plus $$$$
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by Augie11: @fubah2 Has Philly announced starter yet? Yes. Rangel. Decent. Slightly better than avg imho. Not in the class of his counterpart BURNS but decent. Phillies however DO have about a full run edge at the plate over Cinci... Looks like a potential coin-flipper to me...
I like the Mets and KC over 9 1/2, Mets pitching is a mess and bull pen is running on empty, throw in KC has been hot at the plate. And they are plus money. Thoughts?
Ps, I’m a little new to posting so if I’m doing this out of order and wrong, just let me know. Good luck tonight! ??
@fubah2
I like the Mets and KC over 9 1/2, Mets pitching is a mess and bull pen is running on empty, throw in KC has been hot at the plate. And they are plus money. Thoughts?
Ps, I’m a little new to posting so if I’m doing this out of order and wrong, just let me know. Good luck tonight! ??
@fubah2 I like the Mets and KC over 9 1/2, Mets pitching is a mess and bull pen is running on empty, throw in KC has been hot at the plate. And they are plus money. Thoughts? Ps, I’m a little new to posting so if I’m doing this out of order and wrong, just let me know. Good luck tonight! ??
Well they sure went OVER the number yesterday!!
I passed because of the uncertainty surrounding the Royals pitching....but you may be on to something!
PS> You are welcome to comment here...
Quote Originally Posted by Augie11:
@fubah2 I like the Mets and KC over 9 1/2, Mets pitching is a mess and bull pen is running on empty, throw in KC has been hot at the plate. And they are plus money. Thoughts? Ps, I’m a little new to posting so if I’m doing this out of order and wrong, just let me know. Good luck tonight! ??
Well they sure went OVER the number yesterday!!
I passed because of the uncertainty surrounding the Royals pitching....but you may be on to something!
Well KC has 3 rhp relievers out and Mets have 7 relievers on IL so I’m hoping for maybe one of the out fielders giving it a go??. Thanks again man and good luck on picks!!
im on Detroit with you also..
@fubah2
Well KC has 3 rhp relievers out and Mets have 7 relievers on IL so I’m hoping for maybe one of the out fielders giving it a go??. Thanks again man and good luck on picks!!
Dodgers scrape by with a 8 - 7 HOME win over the weakass Rockies, then LOSE 3 - 4 the next evening. In Dodgers current homestand they are just 2 - 4 if YOU were choosing to bet them on the -RL, with large juice losses.Their previous home stand they lost 2 games and won 4 but each win by just one run. So, the last 12 Dodger HOME games, 2 - 10 betting the -RL
You know whats really funny about this, according to a lot of posters on this forum, when a team like the dodgers lose at high prices, its just a 1 game loss in their win/loss record. Not based on how many units the dodgers actually cost you
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Dodgers scrape by with a 8 - 7 HOME win over the weakass Rockies, then LOSE 3 - 4 the next evening. In Dodgers current homestand they are just 2 - 4 if YOU were choosing to bet them on the -RL, with large juice losses.Their previous home stand they lost 2 games and won 4 but each win by just one run. So, the last 12 Dodger HOME games, 2 - 10 betting the -RL
You know whats really funny about this, according to a lot of posters on this forum, when a team like the dodgers lose at high prices, its just a 1 game loss in their win/loss record. Not based on how many units the dodgers actually cost you
. I Woulda . . . When I sit down at the table to cap my games there are papers spread out everywhere, and my computer screen (65" Sanyo TV I use as my monitor) I have 11 tabs open with different stats. Once I finish my pre-series RPG Worksheet (assessing offenses), then I get down to capping that day's games. While capping them I have "circled" multiple teams/odds and totals which look decent based on my first projections (ie, potential/probable bets!) But the effort isn't over as I prefer to confirm the lineups, assess the updated weather forecasts, and watch closely for injury or "resting player" updates as we approach gametimes...Then, from all those "circled" potential bets I make my actual bets and post most of them (I usually keep my parlays and props to myself) "Wouldas" are circled picks that I initially considered but for one reason or another didn't bet. Now looking back at my capping sheets, I can assess the results of all those games which I liked and I "woulda" bet but didn't..... ie. "I Woulda Won that" (WW) or "I Woulda Lost that" (WL) had I actually bet them. Results of my"Wouldas" since May 01 to date: 50 - 25 SIDES! 66% (~60% were plus $; a few RL; only 4 of the 25 losses woulda been large favs ) 45 - 41 Unders ...theoretical loss with juice 26 - 8 OVERS! 76% hit rate on the overs I passed up! Today Philly and Brewers will be added to that list
Thats insane that you are discarding those plays. Seems like you found a golden goose amongst your capping and your passing on them. I might be forced to send the guys in the white coats to your house, to pick you, lollllllllllllll
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
. I Woulda . . . When I sit down at the table to cap my games there are papers spread out everywhere, and my computer screen (65" Sanyo TV I use as my monitor) I have 11 tabs open with different stats. Once I finish my pre-series RPG Worksheet (assessing offenses), then I get down to capping that day's games. While capping them I have "circled" multiple teams/odds and totals which look decent based on my first projections (ie, potential/probable bets!) But the effort isn't over as I prefer to confirm the lineups, assess the updated weather forecasts, and watch closely for injury or "resting player" updates as we approach gametimes...Then, from all those "circled" potential bets I make my actual bets and post most of them (I usually keep my parlays and props to myself) "Wouldas" are circled picks that I initially considered but for one reason or another didn't bet. Now looking back at my capping sheets, I can assess the results of all those games which I liked and I "woulda" bet but didn't..... ie. "I Woulda Won that" (WW) or "I Woulda Lost that" (WL) had I actually bet them. Results of my"Wouldas" since May 01 to date: 50 - 25 SIDES! 66% (~60% were plus $; a few RL; only 4 of the 25 losses woulda been large favs ) 45 - 41 Unders ...theoretical loss with juice 26 - 8 OVERS! 76% hit rate on the overs I passed up! Today Philly and Brewers will be added to that list
Thats insane that you are discarding those plays. Seems like you found a golden goose amongst your capping and your passing on them. I might be forced to send the guys in the white coats to your house, to pick you, lollllllllllllll
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: . I Woulda . . . When I sit down at the table to cap my games there are papers spread out everywhere, and my computer screen (65" Sanyo TV I use as my monitor) I have 11 tabs open with different stats. Once I finish my pre-series RPG Worksheet (assessing offenses), then I get down to capping that day's games. While capping them I have "circled" multiple teams/odds and totals which look decent based on my first projections (ie, potential/probable bets!) But the effort isn't over as I prefer to confirm the lineups, assess the updated weather forecasts, and watch closely for injury or "resting player" updates as we approach gametimes...Then, from all those "circled" potential bets I make my actual bets and post most of them (I usually keep my parlays and props to myself) "Wouldas" are circled picks that I initially considered but for one reason or another didn't bet. Now looking back at my capping sheets, I can assess the results of all those games which I liked and I "woulda" bet but didn't..... ie. "I Woulda Won that" (WW) or "I Woulda Lost that" (WL) had I actually bet them. Results of my"Wouldas" since May 01 to date: 50 - 25 SIDES! 66% (~60% were plus $; a few RL; only 4 of the 25 losses woulda been large favs ) 45 - 41 Unders ...theoretical loss with juice 26 - 8 OVERS! 76% hit rate on the overs I passed up! Today Philly and Brewers will be added to that list Thats insane that you are discarding those plays. Seems like you found a golden goose amongst your capping and your passing on them. I might be forced to send the guys in the white coats to your house, to pick you, lollllllllllllll Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Well after WEBB imploded in the top of the 1st, my first bet fate was sealed... One loss won't hurt....great night last night. "You can't chip in for birdie if you hit the green in regulation". I tell myself that 18 times each day on the course. Tailing again today, appreciate your knowledge of MLB.@fubah2 GL today! 2 big ump plays for tomorrow, that i wanted to get out tonight. seattle over 8 12-3 umpire bias and the whitesox 16-3 home ump bias. will post later. Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: . It's HUMPING DAY! ...unless you're married and over 35...in which case it's just another Wednesday L Giants +113 @pinnW TIGGERS -140 @pinnW Marlins +116 @pinn 2 - 1 +1.16u
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: . I Woulda . . . When I sit down at the table to cap my games there are papers spread out everywhere, and my computer screen (65" Sanyo TV I use as my monitor) I have 11 tabs open with different stats. Once I finish my pre-series RPG Worksheet (assessing offenses), then I get down to capping that day's games. While capping them I have "circled" multiple teams/odds and totals which look decent based on my first projections (ie, potential/probable bets!) But the effort isn't over as I prefer to confirm the lineups, assess the updated weather forecasts, and watch closely for injury or "resting player" updates as we approach gametimes...Then, from all those "circled" potential bets I make my actual bets and post most of them (I usually keep my parlays and props to myself) "Wouldas" are circled picks that I initially considered but for one reason or another didn't bet. Now looking back at my capping sheets, I can assess the results of all those games which I liked and I "woulda" bet but didn't..... ie. "I Woulda Won that" (WW) or "I Woulda Lost that" (WL) had I actually bet them. Results of my"Wouldas" since May 01 to date: 50 - 25 SIDES! 66% (~60% were plus $; a few RL; only 4 of the 25 losses woulda been large favs ) 45 - 41 Unders ...theoretical loss with juice 26 - 8 OVERS! 76% hit rate on the overs I passed up! Today Philly and Brewers will be added to that list Thats insane that you are discarding those plays. Seems like you found a golden goose amongst your capping and your passing on them. I might be forced to send the guys in the white coats to your house, to pick you, lollllllllllllll Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Well after WEBB imploded in the top of the 1st, my first bet fate was sealed... One loss won't hurt....great night last night. "You can't chip in for birdie if you hit the green in regulation". I tell myself that 18 times each day on the course. Tailing again today, appreciate your knowledge of MLB.@fubah2 GL today! 2 big ump plays for tomorrow, that i wanted to get out tonight. seattle over 8 12-3 umpire bias and the whitesox 16-3 home ump bias. will post later. Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: . It's HUMPING DAY! ...unless you're married and over 35...in which case it's just another Wednesday L Giants +113 @pinnW TIGGERS -140 @pinnW Marlins +116 @pinn 2 - 1 +1.16u
my ump over plays finish the night 2-1 pushing the week record to 5-3. Will try to add another 1 or 2 units this week and then take a break until after the all star break
2 big ump plays already posted tonight
my ump over plays finish the night 2-1 pushing the week record to 5-3. Will try to add another 1 or 2 units this week and then take a break until after the all star break
Nice job yesterday, Fubah..! What you think about the early game on Atlanta @ Pittsburg this morning? I'd say Atlanta bites a big one and flops, and Pitty kills it.. Pit -105
@ZipYourLib
Good Day!
Passing on this one. Stronger Pitty bats vs stronger (Good starter, Elder, overdue for good game) Could go either way imho, hence the line suggesting same......but no body would be wrong taking either side and same for total, regardless the outcome.
Just started looking at today's games after overdue sleep in......
Quote Originally Posted by ZipYourLib:
Nice job yesterday, Fubah..! What you think about the early game on Atlanta @ Pittsburg this morning? I'd say Atlanta bites a big one and flops, and Pitty kills it.. Pit -105
@ZipYourLib
Good Day!
Passing on this one. Stronger Pitty bats vs stronger (Good starter, Elder, overdue for good game) Could go either way imho, hence the line suggesting same......but no body would be wrong taking either side and same for total, regardless the outcome.
Just started looking at today's games after overdue sleep in......
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: @ZipYourLib Good Day! Passing on this one. Stronger Pitty bats vs stronger (Good starter, Elder, overdue for good game) Could go either way imho, hence the line suggesting same......but no body would be wrong taking either side and same for total, regardless the outcome. Just started looking at today's games after overdue sleep in......
@fubah2 Just was i just explained he,s due for improvement.
EXACTLY! Doesn't guarantee his run support will come through though and we are uncertain about Keller and him being due for a good one as well......but BoL!
Quote Originally Posted by trust-me:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: @ZipYourLib Good Day! Passing on this one. Stronger Pitty bats vs stronger (Good starter, Elder, overdue for good game) Could go either way imho, hence the line suggesting same......but no body would be wrong taking either side and same for total, regardless the outcome. Just started looking at today's games after overdue sleep in......
@fubah2 Just was i just explained he,s due for improvement.
EXACTLY! Doesn't guarantee his run support will come through though and we are uncertain about Keller and him being due for a good one as well......but BoL!
my ump over plays finish the night 2-1 pushing the week record to 5-3. Will try to add another 1 or 2 units this week and then take a break until after the all star break
2 big ump plays already posted tonight
Quote Originally Posted by cd329:
my ump over plays finish the night 2-1 pushing the week record to 5-3. Will try to add another 1 or 2 units this week and then take a break until after the all star break
2 big ump plays for tomorrow, that i wanted to get out tonight.
Hot Forum Topics
