Wagerline.com would like to congratulate kaseydad for winning the NCAAB Regular Season.
Congrats to all those who won prizes during the NCAAB Season, and good luck in the Madness Tourney!
Cheers,
Ponch ||peace.gif' border=0>
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Wagerline.com would like to congratulate kaseydad for winning the NCAAB Regular Season.
Congrats to all those who won prizes during the NCAAB Season, and good luck in the Madness Tourney!
Cheers,
Ponch ||peace.gif' border=0>
First, I'd like to say congrats to Kaseydad. He did a great job in collecting the most units for the season. Job well done. I do have to disagree on how the standings are calculated. I believe that winning pecentage is the only way to find-out who is the best handicapper. Maybe you could use some formula that incorporates both. Just a suggestion. Well, I like your site and hope to win a season one day. Until then, my goal will always be to predict above 52.5% winners which is profitability in handicapping.
First, I'd like to say congrats to Kaseydad. He did a great job in collecting the most units for the season. Job well done. I do have to disagree on how the standings are calculated. I believe that winning pecentage is the only way to find-out who is the best handicapper. Maybe you could use some formula that incorporates both. Just a suggestion. Well, I like your site and hope to win a season one day. Until then, my goal will always be to predict above 52.5% winners which is profitability in handicapping.
you can actually be a loser at 52.4 %
it depends on the amount of games you bet and how much you bet.
example
900 games at 100 to win 110 if lose.
You would break even. ||Peace_5.gif' border=0>
WINS471=47,100
Loses429=47,190
you can actually be a loser at 52.4 %
it depends on the amount of games you bet and how much you bet.
example
900 games at 100 to win 110 if lose.
You would break even. ||Peace_5.gif' border=0>
WINS471=47,100
Loses429=47,190
actually, 52.4% of 900 is 471.6 not 471. therefore in your example the calculations would read
wins 471.6=47160
losses 428.4=47124
you would profit.
obviously you could win 99% of your games at $100 each and still be a loser if your one loss was for $10,000.
99x100=9900
1x10,000=10000||peace.gif' border=0>
actually, 52.4% of 900 is 471.6 not 471. therefore in your example the calculations would read
wins 471.6=47160
losses 428.4=47124
you would profit.
obviously you could win 99% of your games at $100 each and still be a loser if your one loss was for $10,000.
99x100=9900
1x10,000=10000||peace.gif' border=0>
add the juice on above loss and your at -$11,ooo. all comparisons made by percentage must be made at the same bet price or, as you can see percentages can be very misleading.||an_cheers.gif' border=0>
add the juice on above loss and your at -$11,ooo. all comparisons made by percentage must be made at the same bet price or, as you can see percentages can be very misleading.||an_cheers.gif' border=0>
Hot Forum Topics
