That is a great point. We subsidize a product which SUPPORTS a combustion engine, yet we wont properly subsidize solar or wind like other countries are. That proves again that we as a country are cheap person to the lobbyist dollars.
Oh and we TAX Brazilian ethanol to the tune of 100% what the hell is that about?
Claycourt, if you get filled on the sale, I will be out of my call position too..
So lets RUMBLE....
0
Vermeer,
That is a great point. We subsidize a product which SUPPORTS a combustion engine, yet we wont properly subsidize solar or wind like other countries are. That proves again that we as a country are cheap person to the lobbyist dollars.
Oh and we TAX Brazilian ethanol to the tune of 100% what the hell is that about?
Claycourt, if you get filled on the sale, I will be out of my call position too..
Why are they holding off normal natural economic cycle? WHY? Who are they trying to protect?
They
are selling our assets at 20-50% discounts..our ASSETS..screw inflation
and credit market conditions, plus they have been doing this for 5 plus
yrs. So the recent developments might warrant the flooding, but why
have they been doing this since pre-2003?
Well, they did it prior to then to deal with the Sand L
bailout, the LTCM crisis etc etc.and it worked, although it takes a
very long time to rid oneself of bad assets. I do not mean to come across as apologist for them, but they do know the economics of the equation.This time they really believe it preferable to prevent a totla freeze of corporate credit than to flood the place with money.They may be right, I do not know.But they chose that policy fully aware of the damage they were doing to the USD.
0
Why are they holding off normal natural economic cycle? WHY? Who are they trying to protect?
They
are selling our assets at 20-50% discounts..our ASSETS..screw inflation
and credit market conditions, plus they have been doing this for 5 plus
yrs. So the recent developments might warrant the flooding, but why
have they been doing this since pre-2003?
Well, they did it prior to then to deal with the Sand L
bailout, the LTCM crisis etc etc.and it worked, although it takes a
very long time to rid oneself of bad assets. I do not mean to come across as apologist for them, but they do know the economics of the equation.This time they really believe it preferable to prevent a totla freeze of corporate credit than to flood the place with money.They may be right, I do not know.But they chose that policy fully aware of the damage they were doing to the USD.
I'd look to buy weakness.....that is your best bet. A FINANCIAL BAILOUT PACKAGE is coming. When? I wish I could tell you. Probably during or immediately after a total market meltdown.
You CANNOT go wrong buying MSFT on weakness....to me, MSFT caught in a panic selling meltdown would be gold getting long.
0
Vermeer-
50/50 either way.
I'd look to buy weakness.....that is your best bet. A FINANCIAL BAILOUT PACKAGE is coming. When? I wish I could tell you. Probably during or immediately after a total market meltdown.
You CANNOT go wrong buying MSFT on weakness....to me, MSFT caught in a panic selling meltdown would be gold getting long.
I was hoping to see it dinged today, but it never did, not from the start. I wanted it around 34.Never got near it.
I think the jobs report will be massaged numbers by the way.Especially after today.They will fake em up as much as possible.
I may go long on MSFT regardless. Sits on too much cash to worry much about.
The volatility of this market gives me serious pause before going long on any but the safest stocks. In fact I was closing positions out, just not fast enough.
On the positive side, isn't part of the bet that 2008 will generate such political pressure on Ben to cut (to try and avoid recession, that to me is already in the cards)?
0
I was hoping to see it dinged today, but it never did, not from the start. I wanted it around 34.Never got near it.
I think the jobs report will be massaged numbers by the way.Especially after today.They will fake em up as much as possible.
I may go long on MSFT regardless. Sits on too much cash to worry much about.
The volatility of this market gives me serious pause before going long on any but the safest stocks. In fact I was closing positions out, just not fast enough.
On the positive side, isn't part of the bet that 2008 will generate such political pressure on Ben to cut (to try and avoid recession, that to me is already in the cards)?
Yeah, WSC, I bailed out. I forced that trade, totally. Hideous discipline. Appalling. I had 155 in the sites, waited for a pullback to the 154s, never got it, got mad, forced my way in at 156.1873, and sweat the whole time.
Bad discipline. Am lucky the trading gods didn't punish me and let me slide with a few bucks. Usually they ain't so kind.
0
Yeah, WSC, I bailed out. I forced that trade, totally. Hideous discipline. Appalling. I had 155 in the sites, waited for a pullback to the 154s, never got it, got mad, forced my way in at 156.1873, and sweat the whole time.
Bad discipline. Am lucky the trading gods didn't punish me and let me slide with a few bucks. Usually they ain't so kind.
problem is that 5 yrs ago there was no credit crunch, so why did they start the policy back then?
Recall the panic after 9/11 ? I will review a few articles around and see of course I could read Greenspan's tome and hear his spin for all his blunders. But I just don' have the time or stomache for Greenie...
0
problem is that 5 yrs ago there was no credit crunch, so why did they start the policy back then?
Recall the panic after 9/11 ? I will review a few articles around and see of course I could read Greenspan's tome and hear his spin for all his blunders. But I just don' have the time or stomache for Greenie...
I agree that the numbers tomorrow will be lies, as they always are.
But if they are not jimmied up, and MSFT takes a spanking tomorrow, I will be getting long it, for sure. Why? It's a monster, technically sound, and there's a FINANCIAL BAILOUT PACKAGE coming that will touch off a short-covering bomb, especially if there is a panic selling meltdown tomorrow.
I'd love to see a total meltdown tomorrow. That would be great. Could get long MSFT and maybe FSLR.
I am sure some sort of BAILOUT PACKAGE is in the works, and I want my sorry ass in 1-2 long trades before it hits.
0
Vermeer-
I agree that the numbers tomorrow will be lies, as they always are.
But if they are not jimmied up, and MSFT takes a spanking tomorrow, I will be getting long it, for sure. Why? It's a monster, technically sound, and there's a FINANCIAL BAILOUT PACKAGE coming that will touch off a short-covering bomb, especially if there is a panic selling meltdown tomorrow.
I'd love to see a total meltdown tomorrow. That would be great. Could get long MSFT and maybe FSLR.
I am sure some sort of BAILOUT PACKAGE is in the works, and I want my sorry ass in 1-2 long trades before it hits.
Yeah, man, thanks. Looks like your down 400 day is coming 'round the mountain, which makes me think there won't be a panic sell-off tomorrow if jobs numbers are bad.
But my FSLR trade was poor discipline. I've been scalded enough in the past to know better than to force longs in that situation. Funny, I made money on it, but am pissed at myself for the lack of discipline.
Cheers
0
WSC-
Yeah, man, thanks. Looks like your down 400 day is coming 'round the mountain, which makes me think there won't be a panic sell-off tomorrow if jobs numbers are bad.
But my FSLR trade was poor discipline. I've been scalded enough in the past to know better than to force longs in that situation. Funny, I made money on it, but am pissed at myself for the lack of discipline.
One thing I do like (and have for some time) and will continue to like, is SKF.I do not think people realize how long it is going to take the banks etc to finally get a handle on the mess...many years, if previous history is any guide.
0
One thing I do like (and have for some time) and will continue to like, is SKF.I do not think people realize how long it is going to take the banks etc to finally get a handle on the mess...many years, if previous history is any guide.
If the jobs numbers are hideous tomorrow, AND there is a panic sell-off, there'll be all kinds of talking heads calling for a BLACK MONDAY crash. That will be the cue to get long for a trade these 2 names:
MSFT
FSLR
Won't be easy, which is why it is the right thing to do. The easy thing would be to "wait and see." Then you're sitting on the sidelines when the BAILOUT PACKAGE comes.
0
No doubt about it.
If the jobs numbers are hideous tomorrow, AND there is a panic sell-off, there'll be all kinds of talking heads calling for a BLACK MONDAY crash. That will be the cue to get long for a trade these 2 names:
MSFT
FSLR
Won't be easy, which is why it is the right thing to do. The easy thing would be to "wait and see." Then you're sitting on the sidelines when the BAILOUT PACKAGE comes.
For a "trade," IMB is strong. Why? HUGE, HUMONGOUS SHORT POSITION. This goes off like a bomb if shorts are squeezed.
To play the financial crisis for the long haul, I am seriously looking at FHN (First Horizon). It is a bank, which protects it somewhat from the latest housing fiasco. For those young 'uns in their 20s just married, doing the kids thing, FHN is almost a must add for an IRA. I don't know how old you are, but I think FHN is a winner after the housing crisis is over.....but the BIG return may not be for another 5-10 years.
I only have 3 "long haul" holdings:
GTLS (winner for sure)
CRDC (HUGE upside....you know this one)
SYY (looks dead with the oil horrors, but an EASY winner if oil stabilizes)
FHN may get added to this mix. But I am old and do not have time to wait 10 years, so not sure.
IMO, there is no better way to profit from the recent housing dump than with getting long FHN.
Cheers
0
Vermeer-
For a "trade," IMB is strong. Why? HUGE, HUMONGOUS SHORT POSITION. This goes off like a bomb if shorts are squeezed.
To play the financial crisis for the long haul, I am seriously looking at FHN (First Horizon). It is a bank, which protects it somewhat from the latest housing fiasco. For those young 'uns in their 20s just married, doing the kids thing, FHN is almost a must add for an IRA. I don't know how old you are, but I think FHN is a winner after the housing crisis is over.....but the BIG return may not be for another 5-10 years.
I only have 3 "long haul" holdings:
GTLS (winner for sure)
CRDC (HUGE upside....you know this one)
SYY (looks dead with the oil horrors, but an EASY winner if oil stabilizes)
FHN may get added to this mix. But I am old and do not have time to wait 10 years, so not sure.
IMO, there is no better way to profit from the recent housing dump than with getting long FHN.
I like IMB at these prices because they are not ONLY a lender and they didnt get involved with the CFC dirty mortgages..the worst IMB did was ALT-A loans, which are really "no-doc" loans and the numbers of mortgage in arrears for ALT-A loans is much lower than some of the other stinker instruments.
IMB reversed HARD..some strong selling. I wonder if there was some rumor out there..I dunno.
One other thing..I am smart enough to know this sort of selling here means more tomorrow.
0
I like IMB at these prices because they are not ONLY a lender and they didnt get involved with the CFC dirty mortgages..the worst IMB did was ALT-A loans, which are really "no-doc" loans and the numbers of mortgage in arrears for ALT-A loans is much lower than some of the other stinker instruments.
IMB reversed HARD..some strong selling. I wonder if there was some rumor out there..I dunno.
One other thing..I am smart enough to know this sort of selling here means more tomorrow.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.